US drone now Iran’s property: defence minister

[gOtHmOG]

Why?

1- If Iran 'hacked' the UAV operation centers back in Nevada to do whatever it takes to divert one US UAV to Iran, that is theft.

2- If Iran committed a wide area wide bandwidth high power EM transmission DESIGNED to interfere with the normal operations of any electrical devices, and even though the consequential actions of those devices cannot be predicted when they are affected by this jamming signal, the fact that Iran committed such an act meant Iran wanted to created an environmental condition in the hope that an American UAV would be sufficiently affected and fly into Iranian airspace. This make Iran no less a thief than option 1.

So which do you PREFER to believe? That Iran actually 'hacked' into the UAV operations centers in CONUS, thereby making Iran a thief? Or that it was a mistake or deliberate trespass on our part, thereby making US look silly for asking for the return of our property?

Do you actually believe what you are saying?! The drone was spying ,plain and simple and that is a violation of international law. Iran has the right to do whatever it wants with the drone

 

[somebozo]

by saying: “We’ve asked for it back. We’ll see how the Iranians respond.”

and the Iranian have responded with a middle finger..good job bama! time to lick your wounds and move on!

---------- Post added at 08:23 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:22 PM ----------

Why not?The Chinese returned the USN EP-3 after the infamous 2001 mid air collision.

In really small pieces packed into cartoons! U missed some facts!

 

[53fd]

With all the sanctioning the US & the international community has been inflicting on Iran, Obama has a lot of cheek asking Iran to hand back the drone (& that too a violation of international law by the US).

 

[harpoon]

In really small pieces packed into cartoons! U missed some facts!

Bcs after the collision & 'stripping' by Chinese the EP3 was not airworthy.

 

[Awesome]

Why?

1- If Iran 'hacked' the UAV operation centers back in Nevada to do whatever it takes to divert one US UAV to Iran, that is theft.

2- If Iran committed a wide area wide bandwidth high power EM transmission DESIGNED to interfere with the normal operations of any electrical devices, and even though the consequential actions of those devices cannot be predicted when they are affected by this jamming signal, the fact that Iran committed such an act meant Iran wanted to created an environmental condition in the hope that an American UAV would be sufficiently affected and fly into Iranian airspace. This make Iran no less a thief than option 1.

So which do you PREFER to believe? That Iran actually 'hacked' into the UAV operations centers in CONUS, thereby making Iran a thief? Or that it was a mistake or deliberate trespass on our part, thereby making US look silly for asking for the return of our property?

Option 3, it was flying in Iran as Iran said and it got it down by any means necessary and inflicted a loss on an enemy SPYING on it and will profit from gaining intel and possibly tech know how.

Your generalization wasn't really clever...

---------- Post added at 10:06 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:04 PM ----------

Iran should have ignored the American president's plea to return his toy back. Hes playing at something - fishing for reaction from Iran.