What's new

Uproar in Muslim world after BJP leaders' derogatory remarks on Prophet

Prophet Muhammad married Aisyah when she is small, but that is ceremonial, she keeps living in Abu Bakar house until she become adult ( active sex hormon- menstruation ). That is Arab culture as well during that period.

Arab in the ancient time is not stupid and prophet Muhammad is the most kind and knowleadgeable person on earth. He has Fatimah as his lovely daughter and other daughter as well, long before he has Aisyah as wife.
 
This is nowhere revealed in Quran, in fact Quran mentions that someone is mature when they are of marriage age, a 9 year old or a 6 year old cannot be that mature no matter what times we are living in.

The actual age of Hazrat Ayesha May ALLAH be pleased with her was minimum 20 years or so, when she agreed to look after Messenger Peace be upon him household matters as a wife. One account says she was 40+ years old.

This 9 years or 6 years is only mentioned in books of traditions (man narrated not divine), regardless if a Muslim believes those traditions or not it has nothing to do with his / her faith as a Muslim.

The only problem is Muslim clergy who shamelessly never denied that this tradition is concocted and is not true. Plus most of the Muslims even on this thread never dared to mention this.

The Hindu lady not only used a lie to disrespect two respectable personalities, but used it to vent her hate. If she was honest she would have done her homework.
sadly no ine bothered to check or correct Hazrat Abu Hurara RA who is the only scribe who mentions Hazrat Aisha RA as a minor. no other scribe or caliph or sultan fixed that error.

It is a shame that due to this oversight , the age of most celebrated influential wife of Holy Prophet Muhammad PBUH has become a source of controversy and means to insult islam.
 

Iran summons Indian ambassador over sacrilegious remarks against Prophet Muhammad​

Sunday, 05 June 2022 5:20 PM [ Last Update: Sunday, 05 June 2022 6:02 PM ]

US Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) (L) talks with Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) during a rally with fellow Democrats before voting on H.R. 1, or the People Act, on the East Steps of the US Capitol on March 08, 2019 in Washington, DC. (AFP photo)

The file photo shows a view of the Iranian Foreign Ministry building in Tehran.

Iran’s Foreign Ministry has summoned the Indian ambassador to protest a TV debate during which sacrilegious remarks were made against Islam’s Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon Him), sparking widespread condemnations across the Muslim world.

The director general of the South Asia Department at Iran’s Foreign Ministry on Sunday summoned the Indian envoy to convey the strong protest of the Iranian government and people over the sacrilegious comments against Prophet Muhammad, the Iranian Foreign Ministry website reported.

The Indian envoy, for his part, expressed regret, saying that any sacrilege against the Prophet of Islam is not acceptable at all.

The ambassador also clarified that the comments made by two officials of the ruling party did not reflect the position of the Indian government, which he said reveres all religions.

In recent remarks on a TV news debate, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)'s spokesperson Nupur Sharma made inflammatory comments against the Prophet of Islam, which led to widespread condemnation in the country and also triggered violent clashes in Uttar Pradesh’s Kanpur on Friday.

The BJP on Sunday suspended Sharma from the party while distancing itself from her offensive remarks.

The party also expelled Naveen Kumar Jindal, who heads its Delhi media, from the party, after he allegedly posted a tweet about the Prophet but later deleted it. The BJP said Jindal's views on social media undermine communal harmony and are in violation of the party's fundamental beliefs.

In a statement earlier in the day, the BJP said, “During the thousands of years of the history of India, every religion has blossomed and flourished. The Bharatiya Janata Party respects all religions. The BJP strongly denounces insult of any religious personalities of any religion.”

“The Bharatiya Janata Party is also strongly against any ideology, which insults or demeans any sect or religion. The BJP does not promote such people or philosophy,” it added.

Following the development, #الا ـ رسول ـ الله ـ يا ـ مودي (#AnyoneButTheProphetOModi) has taken social media by storm, securing the number one trend on Twitter in Arab states.

In a tweet on Sunday, Sharma apologized for her comments, saying, “I take back my words if they have hurt anyone's religious sentiments.”

Muslim countries, OIC slam sacrilege of Prophet Muhammad

Sharma's comments have stirred outrage in several Muslim countries, including Pakistan, Qatar and Kuwait.

Pakistan said in a statement that it condemns in the "strongest possible terms" the highly derogatory remarks.

"Pakistan once again calls on the international community to take immediate cognizance of the grievously aggravating situation of Islamophobia in India," it said.

The State of Kuwait also summoned the Indian ambassador, saying that it had handed the ambassador a protest note in which Kuwait rejected and denounced the statements made by the BJP official.

Qatar's Foreign Ministry statement also said it welcomed the (BJP) party's decision to suspend the official, but said Qatar was expecting a public apology and immediate condemnation of these remarks by the Indian government.

Indian ambassador in Doha, Deepak Mittal, was summoned to the Foreign Ministry on the second day of a high profile visit by India's Vice President Venkaiah Naidu and Indian business leaders.

The envoy was handed an official protest letter which said "Qatar is expecting a public apology and immediate condemnation of these remarks from the government of India," according to a foreign ministry statement.

"Allowing such Islamophobic remarks to continue without punishment constitutes a grave danger to the protection of human rights" and "will create a cycle of violence and hate", it added.

The Organization of Islamic Cooperation also condemned the sacrilegious remarks, saying they came in a "context of intensifying hatred and abuse towards Islam in India and systematic practices against Muslims."

Yemen’s Ansarullah movement also condemned the BJP spokesperson’s insulting remarks against Prophet Muhammad as unacceptable, noting that it indicated “moral bankruptcy” of those behind such remarks.

 
Last edited:
Prophet Muhammad never married a woman for at least 10 years after Khadijah pass away. Aisyah is daughter of Abu Bakar, Abu Bakar wants prophet Muhammad blood runs through his offspring, it is Abu Bakar that insist his daughter to marry prophet Muhammad
 
1/1.4 bn is mathematically negligible
This is what Indians' response is to excuse every crime in their country, be it rape, lynching, torture, genocide or state sponsored terrorism.

Even disregarding that, this "one" person is also a spokesperson for your 1.4 billion country, who democratically voted him along with his hindu nationalist party in by a huge majority - not to mention their election campaign revolved around attacking Muslims and Pakistan. So please, don't blab this 1 out of 1.4 billion nonsense again.
 
Prophet Muhammad marriages, after about 10 years of being single is more due to making alliance, he also married one of daughter from Jews tribe to strengthen alliance in Madinah. Some are widow ( as marrying widow is something encouraged by Islam that will help that widow), and there is also a marriage which is asked by God to be done in order to break some bad culture among Arab at that time
 
This is what Indians' response is to excuse every crime in their country, be it rape, lynching, torture, genocide or state sponsored terrorism.

Even disregarding that, this "one" person is also a spokesperson for your 1.4 billion country, who democratically voted him along with his hindu nationalist party in by a huge majority - not to mention their election campaign revolved around attacking Muslims and Pakistan. So please, don't blab this 1 out of 1.4 billion nonsense again.
Shah Mehmood Qureshi was your foreign minister whom all of you elected democratically. “They don’t represent Pakistan” was what you were giving as an excuse when Pakistanis were harrassing Turkish women in Turkey a few weeks back, or “they don’t represent Pakistan” is what you were use as an excuse to blasphemy killings in your own country.


So don’t tell me about my country, right now your politics is based on who abuses India more to gain the support of Pakistanis, be it Khan, be it shehbaz or even the neutrals.
 

Good one from Turkiye.

Meanwhile, Pakistanis troop's in there silly costumes with ridiculous head gear will carry on entertaining Indian crowd’s on Punjab wagah border ceremonies. How pathetic weak is this we cannot even put halt to this kind of cRap for good, close your borders no trade instead we talk about gulf states

It needs to stop. The border ceremony is a joke.
 
Too late massive damage done you can’t repair this. Everyone know this is a core part of their Ideology. How can the Sanghi government hate themselves lol!
 
Back
Top Bottom