What's new

Unemployment Rate Highest In 45 Years, Reveals Stalled Report: 10 Points

T90TankGuy

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Aug 12, 2010
Messages
9,427
Reaction score
8
Country
India
Location
India
https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/une...n-jobs-10-points-1985931?pfrom=home-topscroll


NEW DELHI: The country's unemployment rate was at a 45-year-high of 6.1 per cent in 2017-18, according to the National Sample Survey Office's (NSSO's) periodic labour force survey (PLFS), which has been accessed by the Business Standard newspaper. The report was not released despite being vetted by the National Statistical Commission in December, allege two non-independent members who quit the data collating body on Tuesday. The report, revealed just a day before the government's interim Budget, sets up a huge controversy just before the national election, due by May, with the opposition targeting the government on jobs data.
Here is your 10-point cheat sheet to this big story:
  1. According to the report, which has not been made public but has been accessed by Business Standard, the unemployment rate was at its highest level since 1972-73.
  2. The report says in 2011-12, the unemployment rate stood at 2.2 per cent and youth unemployment is at "astronomically high" levels of 13 to 27 per cent.
  3. Joblessness was higher in urban areas (7.8 per cent) than in the rural areas (5.3 per cent).
  4. More people are withdrawing from the workforce as the labour force participation rate is lower than in the previous years.
  5. The NSSO's annual household survey of 2017-18 is the first after the November 2016 demonetisation, when Prime Minister Narendra Modi declared an overnight ban on high-value notes.
  6. The report is at the core of a controversy over the quitting of two members of the National Statistical Commission, including its acting chairman PC Mohanan.
  7. PC Mohanan confirmed that one of the reasons why he quit was the delay in the release of the National Sample Survey Office's Periodic Labour Force Survey report.
  8. PC Mohanan told NDTV that he and JV Meenakshi, the only non-government members of the statistics body, felt sidelined and "not taken seriously"
  9. The government clarified that it was "processing" the quarterly data and the report would be released after that. It also said the two members had never voiced their concern in the past few months
  10. "Keeping in view India's strong demographic dividend and around 93 per cent of the informal workforce, it is important to improve measures of employment through administrative statistics and complemented by periodic surveys," the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation said in its statement on Wednesday.

    @Nilgiri @Joe Shearer i told you guys , the NSC has not published any report from march 17 on employment . this report would have been suppressed too but for two of the members resigning and leaking it to the press. and here we have some people claiming people employed selling pani puri is a viable job.
 
Its NDTV.
I will wait for other sources.

Brief Research ::

The report says in 2011-12, the unemployment rate stood at 2.2 per cent and youth unemployment is at "astronomically high" levels of 13 to 27 per cent.

BIG LIE

https://tradingeconomics.com/india/unemployment-rate

une.png
@Nilgiri
 
Last edited:
Its NDTV.
I will wait for other sources.

Brief Research ::

The report says in 2011-12, the unemployment rate stood at 2.2 per cent and youth unemployment is at "astronomically high" levels of 13 to 27 per cent.

BIG LIE

https://tradingeconomics.com/india/unemployment-rate

une.png
@Nilgiri

There is no Lie . Both the independent members of Statistics commission have quit and now modijee is keeping the report under his arse.
He will wait for elections before publishing it. Demonetisation was the single biggest mistake of this regime .
 
There is no Lie . Both the independent members of Statistics commission have quit and now modijee is keeping the report under his arse.
He will wait for elections before publishing it. Demonetisation was the single biggest mistake of this regime .

Mate, Im talking about This :

The report says in 2011-12, the unemployment rate stood at 2.2 percent.

Please correct me.
 
https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/une...n-jobs-10-points-1985931?pfrom=home-topscroll


NEW DELHI: The country's unemployment rate was at a 45-year-high of 6.1 per cent in 2017-18, according to the National Sample Survey Office's (NSSO's) periodic labour force survey (PLFS), which has been accessed by the Business Standard newspaper. The report was not released despite being vetted by the National Statistical Commission in December, allege two non-independent members who quit the data collating body on Tuesday. The report, revealed just a day before the government's interim Budget, sets up a huge controversy just before the national election, due by May, with the opposition targeting the government on jobs data.
Here is your 10-point cheat sheet to this big story:
  1. According to the report, which has not been made public but has been accessed by Business Standard, the unemployment rate was at its highest level since 1972-73.
  2. The report says in 2011-12, the unemployment rate stood at 2.2 per cent and youth unemployment is at "astronomically high" levels of 13 to 27 per cent.
  3. Joblessness was higher in urban areas (7.8 per cent) than in the rural areas (5.3 per cent).
  4. More people are withdrawing from the workforce as the labour force participation rate is lower than in the previous years.
  5. The NSSO's annual household survey of 2017-18 is the first after the November 2016 demonetisation, when Prime Minister Narendra Modi declared an overnight ban on high-value notes.
  6. The report is at the core of a controversy over the quitting of two members of the National Statistical Commission, including its acting chairman PC Mohanan.
  7. PC Mohanan confirmed that one of the reasons why he quit was the delay in the release of the National Sample Survey Office's Periodic Labour Force Survey report.
  8. PC Mohanan told NDTV that he and JV Meenakshi, the only non-government members of the statistics body, felt sidelined and "not taken seriously"
  9. The government clarified that it was "processing" the quarterly data and the report would be released after that. It also said the two members had never voiced their concern in the past few months
  10. "Keeping in view India's strong demographic dividend and around 93 per cent of the informal workforce, it is important to improve measures of employment through administrative statistics and complemented by periodic surveys," the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation said in its statement on Wednesday.

    @Nilgiri @Joe Shearer i told you guys , the NSC has not published any report from march 17 on employment . this report would have been suppressed too but for two of the members resigning and leaking it to the press. and here we have some people claiming people employed selling pani puri is a viable job.

Friend, taking all this as 100% true for sake of argument.... I don't really care if the unemployment level is broadly wherever it is in the 0 - 15% range in India...given unemployment relevance pales in comparison to under-employment problem in India (and they are not correlated all that much either)....given India is very much a country in transient stage of its economy. Only when a country has settled at some development level far down the road from where India is, do unemployment data even start to matter (and there is enough actual data stream for it to qualitatively matter as a number too).

In India you can literally expand say NREGA 10 times and create near 0 "unemployment"...and you will have literally made the economy way worse (esp long term) at same time (given transient nature of those jobs and larger Cost to benefit ratio of such jobs for the money invested...not to mention the underemployment intrinsically found in those "employed" jobs).

Stages of India's economy when raw "unemployment" level was low...were rarely, if ever the best times....given the bulk of the quality of the jobs that caused it to drop (generally associated with welfare programs from rural distress...which should be last resort for govt expenditure, not a default "job-creation" one).

Milton Friedman famously once queried why there was so much manual unproductive jobs in say construction in India (people were carrying cement bags manually and using shovels to dig holes etc). The site foreman said..."sir, we need to create jobs rather than be productive". Friedman then asked, "then why not use spoons instead of shovels? Far more jobs would be created".

That basically illustrates what unemployment vs underemployment is.

Demographic dividend at full play

Idiot troll (that knows nothing on the subject) at fuller play.
 
Friend, taking all this as 100% true for sake of argument.... I don't really care if the unemployment level is broadly wherever it is in the 0 - 15% range in India...given unemployment relevance pales in comparison to under-employment problem in India (and they are not correlated all that much either)....given India is very much a country in transient stage of its economy. Only when a country has settled at some development level far down the road from where India is, do unemployment data even start to matter (and there is enough actual data stream for it to qualitatively matter as a number too).

In India you can literally expand say NREGA 10 times and create near 0 "unemployment"...and you will have literally made the economy way worse (esp long term) at same time (given transient nature of those jobs and larger Cost to benefit ratio of such jobs for the money invested...not to mention the underemployment intrinsically found in those "employed" jobs).

Stages of India's economy when raw "unemployment" level was low...were rarely, if ever the best times....given the bulk of the quality of the jobs that caused it to drop (generally associated with welfare programs from rural distress...which should be last resort for govt expenditure, not a default "job-creation" one).

Milton Friedman famously once queried why there was so much manual unproductive jobs in say construction in India (people were carrying cement bags manually and using shovels to dig holes etc). The site foreman said..."sir, we need to create jobs rather than be productive". Friedman then asked, "then why not use spoons instead of shovels? Far more jobs would be created".

That basically illustrates what unemployment vs underemployment is.



Idiot troll (that knows nothing on the subject) at fuller play.
There are many economic experts writing numerous articles about this Indian problem, guess you also believe they are idiot trolls, how smart you are, lol..
 
Mate, Im talking about This :

The report says in 2011-12, the unemployment rate stood at 2.2 percent.

Please correct me.

Even by that figure it has almost doubled .
 
I didnt get you... Please can you provide some Literature in this context.
I would love to stand corrected. :)

What i mean to say is every news source is standing bu it . It has hit a 4 decade high.
 
There is no Lie . Both the independent members of Statistics commission have quit and now modijee is keeping the report under his arse.
He will wait for elections before publishing it. Demonetisation was the single biggest mistake of this regime .

They are free to correct the record:

https://economictimes.indiatimes.co...uring-meetings-mospi/articleshow/67754894.cms

Demonetisation was no "mistake" either...there is much formalisation that is going on that was spurred by the tax data accumulated. Read phase 6:

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/indias-tech-revolution-aadhar-forbes.599274/
 
Back
Top Bottom