What's new

Uncertainty in Bangladesh ("incredible amount of anti-India feeling within BD")

I am just looking for a reason that big enough which can justify so much of hatred shown by "PDF" bangladeshi for a nation which help you in your bad times and also help you get liberated.
We, common Indians, never feel benefited by you people in any sense nor the government.


When the Muslim people from the different muslim country slagged off Bangladesh regarding the way the BD government handled the Rohingya incident I never took it to heart, I knew they only criticised my government, not me or my people.

The Indian government is a factor behind the AL's doing, even die hard AL supports have said "Eh, this is weird and not like AL", we know AL were retards but they have clearly gone mad now. Any government official and international lawyer who is specialising in Bangladesh will tell you what we are telling you, this is India's doings, ok we can let go of this "RAW", but it is India. International lawyer Tony Cadman, is he a Jamaati?

I only get personal when people get personal with me, like I said when you call me a Jamaati, or make names of us regarding Islam I will get personal. This applies for everyone, bring the correct etiquette when in a debate.

Take 15 minutes out and watch this please...
 
why is that ?o_O
He supports kicking us out of India :suicide:
It's very very hard living as a Hindu in Kashmir now. Though I don't live in Srinigar(from Anantnag), when I visit and go to some temple...while coming out, I need to make sure I am wearing a cap - to hide my tilak. It comes as a reflex now - I don't even have to think about it.
 
He supports kicking us out of India :suicide:
It's very very hard living as a Hindu in Kashmir now. Though I don't live in Srinigar(from Anantnag), when I visit and go to some temple...while coming out, I need to make sure I am wearing a cap - to hide my tilak. It comes as a reflex now - I don't even have to think about it.
i visited kashmir, i understand you bro
 
How?

They are supporting externally. You should be disappointed only when you find AAP running corrupt agenda.
I expected the cases against the corrupt to be filed. Instead all I see is water being shoved down the throats of people. Congress leaders are just getting more time to cover their tracks. By the time the investigations begin - it might just be too late. If they at all begin that is.
 
@ I had always been advocating that the people of this region had always a feeling of anti-India since the partition of Bengal in 1905. Since then they had been finding a way out and when Muslim Leaque was founded the people of this area joint in it. Once the "Two Nation Theory" was made and propagated by Jinnah, it was at once taken away by the people and finally about 97% muslims of this area voted for a united Pakistan in 1946. But these sunny days of united Pakistan was short lived. The migrated Hindus and local left oriented people started making conspiracy how to break United Pakistan. The Indian Media was so strong that Pakistan failed to cope up with these conspiracies. The day Pakistan was created the conspircy started at Calcutta. Soon the migrated Hindus joined with them.

@ In 1948, Muslim Awami Leaque was created but once the East Pakistan Congress merged with Awami Leaque it dropped the name "Muslim" and it became Awami Leaque a pure seculer political party. In 1954 a general election election was held in East Pakistan where Muslim Leaque was rooted out and "Jokto Front" came to power under the leadership of AK Fuzlul Huq, Bashani and Surwardy. But again this Provintial Govt did not last long, hardly for 03/04 months. Soon this govt was dissolved. People always blame this to the Central Govt. But if we critically analysis then we will find it was Sk Mujib who was mainly responsible for this disaster. Firstly, once A K Fuzlul Huq was selected as Chief Minister of East Bengal Province, it was not liked by Mujib (AL) so under his leadership AL bocotted the oath ceremony of Ministers. Secondly, since Sk Mujib initially was not not included in the ministry so, AL under the leadership of Mujib did not joined the ministry. Fazlul Huq had to run the whole minitry for only 2 miniters for about a month. Actually, Mujib and his assocites were not happy with the A K Fuzlul Huq Govt though later on he was made as Labour Minister. Probably, in the centre by this time Hossain Shaheed Surwardy was picked up as a Law Minister,so Mujib had also hand at the centre. Moreso, at that times probably the 3rd Constituent Assembly was being dominated by the Awami Leaque as they sweeped in the election of 1954. Thirdly , once Fuzlul Huq went to Calcutta as Chief of East Bengal he gave some free speech which was against the interest of united Pakistan. So, Mujib got the point soon he started a Bengali-Behari riot at Narranganj where 1000 people died. Under these situation the Mistry under the leadership of Fuzlul Huq was dismissed and Governor rule was imposed. Fourthly, the old people says that once the East Bengal Parliament session was going gone and there was lot of agument and counter argument, and in one stage there was a manhandling inside the parliament. Inthis critical situation Sk Mujib threw paper weight which hit the head of speaker Shahed Ali and who died later in the hospital.

@ Awami Leaque as a political party was never a popular. In 1965, once Munem Khan, the Governor of East Pakistan called all the political leaders in his office to review the situation on the eve of Indo-Pak conflict, Mujib openly proposed to revolt againt Central Govt.

@ In the general election of 1970, the election was not at all free and fair. It was something like intimidation in everywhere. Muslim Leaque was divided into three fraction namely, Convention Muslim Leaque, Counsil Muslim Leaque and Qaumi Muslim Leaque. Khan a Sabur belongs to Qaumi Muslim Leaque, Shah Aziz belongs to Counsil Muslim Leaque and Fazlul Kader Chow belongs to Convention Muslim Leaque. Besides other Islamic parties like Nizam-i-Islami, Pakistan Democratic Party (PDP)were also divided. Jamat-e-Islami was also alone but firm and had a dedicated workers. National Awami Party of Bashani boycotted the election . So, who remains against mighty Awami Leaque. All the young lots were lenned towards left oriented parties. So, Awami Leaque got the free field, ofcourse well guarded by the awami militant. O, I see the military govt of Yahya Khan, he also did not wanted that any fraction of Muslim Leaque to come to power as he himself staged a silent military coup.

@ The election of 1973 was not at all a election where all the muslim/Islamic oriented political parties were totally banned. The election of 1996 where AwamiLeaque got a simple majority due to dis-unity between the BNP, Jatia Party, Jamamt-e-Islami and other Islami parties. But still in some selected areas Awami Leaque carried out a silent vote rigging with the help of "Janatar Munchu".

@ About the last election of 2008, it was a digital vote rigging by the Army itself only just to save their skin.

@ The people of this region are always anti-India and hence anti-Awami Leaque. Definitely people have reaso for it. Finally, I will say that blood matters a lot. Here in Bangladesh most of the muslim people are foreign migrated muslim from Afgan, Persia, Turkey, Arabia, Yeman, Central Asia, Abissinia etc and they are out and out anti-India. We the Bengalees of Bangladesh are heto-genious nation as opposed to homogeneous, this what I believe. That is why there is hardly any compromise between the two political parties and this will continue. It is just a like a railway line which never meets ===============??????????
 
I expected the cases against the corrupt to be filed. Instead all I see is water being shoved down the throats of people. Congress leaders are just getting more time to cover their tracks. By the time the investigations begin - it might just be too late. If they at all begin that is.

First they have showed public that they are committed to deliver, you will see them going after corrupt in coming days. If congress withdraws, at least they can go to public back with head held high. Its just few days mate, wait and watch.
 
The general consensus among BD folks is this - if a BD guy shakes hands with an Indian(God forbid if he is Hindu/Sikh), he becomes a dalal of India. :rofl:
That said BD has been quite ignored by Indian Govts - would have been nice to do more for them. Like we build infrastructure for Bhutan etc. But then political compulsion probably won't even allow that. What's worse, not building infra/helping will fuel more Indophobia in the long run. :D

@Anubis(post #107 and previous ones) has actually cleared the main issue underlying the pretentious civilized charade. It is quite obvious that the 'patriotic' BDeshis want faith to play a more dominant role in their society. The absence of that force and need for emphasizing their unique identity, it becomes necessary to hate 'the other'. He could not have said it better. If civilized and educated men think like that with a cool head, we can safely deduce that no matter what we do(other than converting en masse), the outlook towards India won't change.

We have an well established unique identity....we do not need to emphasize it...we do not need to hate anyone....except for people who live in our land and live of our resources and act against our national interest...they deserve to be hated and kicked out...no questions asked....Bangladesh was never a secular country(except for under a totalitarian socialist regime 40 years ago)...it was not meant to be one in the first place.....Bangladeshis would not have fought in the forefront for the creation of Pakistan if they did not want faith to play a dominant role.....if you want to convert Bangladeshis en masse to Hinduism to favor India you are welcome to try....but trust neither will it be easy nor will it be worth your time...because I can guarantee a nationalist Hindu Bangladeshi does not love India anymore than a nationalist Muslim Bangladeshi....so a Hindu Bangladesh might not be as favorable to you as you think!
 
We have an well established unique identity....we do not need to emphasize it...we do not need to hate anyone....except for people who live in our land and live of our resources and act against our national interest...they deserve to be hated and kicked out...no questions asked....Bangladesh was never a secular country(except for under a totalitarian socialist regime 40 years ago)...it was not meant to be one in the first place.....Bangladeshis would not have fought in the forefront for the creation of Pakistan if they did not want faith to play a dominant role.....if you want to convert Bangladeshis en masse to Hinduism to favor India you are welcome to try....but trust neither will it be easy nor will it be worth your time...because I can guarantee a nationalist Hindu Bangladeshi does not love India anymore than a nationalist Muslim Bangladeshi....so a Hindu Bangladesh might not be as favorable to you as you think!
^^^
I did not mean that. My point was you will consider us friends only if we convert en masse to Islam. I tried to keep things a little subtle. But hatred blinds common sense. :)

"I can guarantee a nationalist Hindu Bangladeshi does not love India anymore than a nationalist Muslim Bangladeshi"
Yeah I can imagine Bangladeshi Hindus/Buddhists to raise Nara-e-Takveer.... :coffee:
Favorable/not favorable - I don't really care. The lack of dominance of Islam is your issue. Go ahead, be Taliban for all I care. Be a Turkey or Afghanistan, I won't give a damn either way. :D

seriously ??:what:
Yeah seriously. Don't believe it? Go to Kheer Bhawani temple on a normal day(when tourists are scarce).
 
^^^
I did not mean that. My point was you will consider us friends only if we convert en masse to Islam. I tried to keep things a little subtle. But hatred blinds common sense. :)

"I can guarantee a nationalist Hindu Bangladeshi does not love India anymore than a nationalist Muslim Bangladeshi"
Yeah I can imagine Bangladeshi Hindus/Buddhists to raise Nara-e-Takveer.... :coffee:
Favorable/not favorable - I don't really care. The lack of dominance of Islam is your issue. Go ahead, be Taliban for all I care. Be a Turkey or Afghanistan, I won't give a damn either way. :D


Yeah seriously. Don't believe it? Go to Kheer Bhawani temple on a normal day(when tourists are scarce).
Then I have to say a)you are wrong and b)when you think you are reading between the lines of what I've written you are infact using your imagination to think what you WANT to think.
#1 I am not an Islamist....neither am I religious one.I do not care who is a muslim or not...I do not give a flying **** about the number or percentage of Muslims in India...If all muslims of India converted to Hinduism or if all hindus converted to Islam it would be of no issue to me!
#2 As long as India retains its retarded policy on Bangladesh it will be hated even if it became the Islamic Republic of India.If it changes its policy Bangladesh will be friends with the Hindustani republic of India.
#3 Bangladeshi nationalists do not raise Nara-e-takveer....their slogan was Joy Bangla and is Bangladesh Zindabad!
Next time think before judging other people!
 
Then I have to say a)you are wrong and b)when you think you are reading between the lines of what I've written you are infact using your imagination to think what you WANT to think.
#1 I am not an Islamist....neither am I religious one.I do not care who is a muslim or not...I do not give a flying **** about the number or percentage of Muslims in India...If all muslims of India converted to Hinduism or if all hindus converted to Islam it would be of no issue to me!
#2 As long as India retains its retarded policy on Bangladesh it will be hated even if it became the Islamic Republic of India.If it changes its policy Bangladesh will be friends with the Hindustani republic of India.
#3 Bangladeshi nationalists do not raise Nara-e-takveer....their slogan was Joy Bangla and is Bangladesh Zindabad!
Next time think before judging other people!
Holy... :D You missed the point again. First - your previous posts contradict you. You did a 180 turn :P (Read your previous posts later)
I have written about two extreme hypothetical situations - that means I was giving an example how little I care about what you do about your country.
 
Holy... :D You missed the point again. First - your previous posts contradict you. You did a 180 turn :P (Read your previous posts later)
I have written about two extreme hypothetical situations - that means I was giving an example how little I care about what you do about your country.
No...I did not make a turn...in my first posts when I was talking about an ultra-right wing takeover of Bangladesh if BAL and its master pushes the country to the brink....I WAS TALKING ABOUT A HYPOTHETICAL SITUATION...not my wish.....I neither want or advocate such a takeover(although I will support them if they ship BAL out of the country)....but it is very much possible!
 
No...I did not make a turn...in my first posts when I was talking about an ultra-right wing takeover of Bangladesh if BAL and its master pushes the country to the brink....I WAS TALKING ABOUT A HYPOTHETICAL SITUATION...not my wish.....I neither want or advocate such a takeover(although I will support them if they ship BAL out of the country)....but it is very much possible!
Okay :coffee:
 
@BDforever

idiots will make mistakes, because thats what they're good at.... they won't stop until they commit a blunder and then squabble among themselves.... let go....

It is futile arguing with them, it is a waste of time. I have concluded that long back. Only way to make them understand is to point a gun to the head of their agents in Bangladesh, where we have numerical superiority. And that can happen when sufficient percentage of Bangladeshi masses have become mad enough due to Indian interference. That is the only argument these retards and their agents will understand.

And Bharat Desh forever will not stop trying to convince his Indian masters about their wrong move, because his first name is Bharat and he cares about them.

A wrong move by the enemy is something to celebrate not despair over.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top Bottom