UN chief calls for restraint on Kashmir

[Aasimkhan]

And in the process destroy Pakistan completely and destroy India partially.

You are a coward, learn to fight like a man

 

[valkyr_96]

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/india-always-rejected-uns-good-offices-over-kashmir-issue-un.629920/

 

[The Eagle]

UN chief calls for restraint on Kashmir
Share
August 09, 2019 09:45

United Nations chief Antonio Guterres on Thursday urged India and Pakistan to exercise "maximum restraint" and refrain from taking steps that could affect the status of Jammu and Kashmir, as he highlighted the Shimla Agreement which rejects any third-party mediation on the issue.

The Secretary-General's remarks came after India on Monday revoked Article 370 to withdraw the special status to Jammu and Kashmir and bifurcated the state into two Union Territories -- Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh.

Pakistan termed the Indian action as "unilateral and illegal", and said it will take the matter to the UN Security Council.

"The Secretary-General has been following the situation in Jammu and Kashmir with concern and makes an appeal for maximum restraint," Guterres' spokesman Stephane Dujarric said in New York.

Dujarric specifically said that the Secretary-General "also recalls the 1972 Agreement on bilateral relations between India and Pakistan, also known as the Shimla Agreement, which states that the final status of Jammu and Kashmir is to be settled by peaceful means" in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations.

The Secretary General did not offer his good offices nor did he make any offer to mediate between India and Pakistan on Kashmir.

Instead, he referred to the Shimla Agreement, which is a bilateral agreement between India and Pakistan and rejects any third-party mediation in the issue.

Guterres also called "on all parties to refrain from taking steps" that could affect the status of Jammu and Kashmir.

He said the position of the United Nations on the region was governed by the Charter of the United Nations and is applicable to Security Council resolutions. -- PTI

http://news.rediff.com/commentary/2...t-on-kashmir/68480fb63074303484179a051fa40ce2

Amending the title to feed India's fascism is not coming for the first time. Corrected the title and you are served as well.

Regards,

 

[Fawadqasim1]

so you want to give up Kashmir beg india for water get bullied by india on every issu

id rather we launch an assault and if that means end of Pakistan so be it if we dont india will treat us like bangladesh and thats unacceptable!

No absolutely not there are better ways a bit long and lengthy but better for that we need to throw out India from Afghanistan first.

 

[The Eagle]

Statement attributable to the Spokesman for the Secretary-General on the situation in Jammu and Kashmir
The Secretary-General has been following the situation in Jammu and Kashmir with concern and makes an appeal for maximum restraint.

The position of the United Nations on this region is governed by the Charter of the United Nations and applicable Security Council resolutions.

The Secretary-General also recalls the 1972 Agreement on bilateral relations between India and Pakistan, also known as the Simla Agreement, which states that the final status of Jammu and Kashmir is to be settled by peaceful means, in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations.

The Secretary-General is also concerned overreports of restrictions on the Indian-side of Kashmir, which could exacerbate the human rights situation in the region.

The Secretary-General calls on all parties to refrain from taking steps that could affect the status of Jammu and Kashmir.

https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg...etary-general-the-situation-jammu-and-kashmir

For Indians, especially victims of Indian Media's lies & manipulation.

 

[Fawadqasim1]

You are a coward, learn to fight like a man

No absolutely not there are better ways a bit long and lengthy but better for that we need to throw out India from Afghanistan first.

risk taking is needed to achieve something big,higher risk means higher will be the reward.

No absolutely not there are better ways a bit long and lengthy but better for that we need to throw out India from Afghanistan first.

 

[Trango Towers]

He is correct. We Pakistanis are idiots who keep saying "leave it to Allah", but never work to improve ourselves. Honestly wake the fk up before it is too late.

Really.
Who said leave it to Allah.?
Allah only helps those who help themselves.
I wont have a cheap drunk who lives in america worships the whiteman and is totally anti Pakistan come and tell me about my country and religion. I suggest you wake the Fk up

 

[Taimoor Khan]

UN chief calls for restraint on Kashmir
Share
August 09, 2019 09:45

United Nations chief Antonio Guterres on Thursday urged India and Pakistan to exercise "maximum restraint" and refrain from taking steps that could affect the status of Jammu and Kashmir, as he highlighted the Shimla Agreement which rejects any third-party mediation on the issue.

The Secretary-General's remarks came after India on Monday revoked Article 370 to withdraw the special status to Jammu and Kashmir and bifurcated the state into two Union Territories -- Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh.

Pakistan termed the Indian action as "unilateral and illegal", and said it will take the matter to the UN Security Council.

"The Secretary-General has been following the situation in Jammu and Kashmir with concern and makes an appeal for maximum restraint," Guterres' spokesman Stephane Dujarric said in New York.

Dujarric specifically said that the Secretary-General "also recalls the 1972 Agreement on bilateral relations between India and Pakistan, also known as the Shimla Agreement, which states that the final status of Jammu and Kashmir is to be settled by peaceful means" in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations.

The Secretary General did not offer his good offices nor did he make any offer to mediate between India and Pakistan on Kashmir.

Instead, he referred to the Shimla Agreement, which is a bilateral agreement between India and Pakistan and rejects any third-party mediation in the issue.

Guterres also called "on all parties to refrain from taking steps" that could affect the status of Jammu and Kashmir.

He said the position of the United Nations on the region was governed by the Charter of the United Nations and is applicable to Security Council resolutions. -- PTI

http://news.rediff.com/commentary/2...t-on-kashmir/68480fb63074303484179a051fa40ce2

https://www.dawn.com/news/1498892/un-chief-urges-all-parties-not-to-change-kashmir-status



UNITED NATIONS: UN Secretary General António Guterres on Thursday called on all parties to refrain from taking steps that could affect the status of Jammu and Kashmir, which is recognised as a disputed territory by the United Nations and the Security Council.


Noting that the secretary general was following the situation with concern, the statement clarified that the UN position on Kashmir was tied to its own charter and applicable Security Council resolutions

 

[newb3e]

so you want to give up Kashmir beg india for water get bullied by india on every issu

id rather we launch an assault and if that means end of Pakistan so be it if we dont india will treat us like bangladesh and thats unacceptable!

wont waitinf also give india to cement their rule in occupied Kashmir build dams and humiliate us?

 

[Nefarious]

UN is orgnisation of cucks as are most of the world leaders and countries nowadays.

In the end Pak will have to keep eye on occupied Kashmir itself and defend them by itself. Any signs of mini sewer settlements and ethnic cleansing or land grabbing will have to be dealt with. Time for goody goody is over.

Ask the population to vote on what action they want and stand by it as nation as one.

 

[AZ1]

For past 70 years Allah is not helping Pakistan...one after the other troubles are good enough signal from Allah that we need to correct something in ourselves and he will not help till that is done.

Islamic sharia law that is what needed in Pakistan.

 

[Trango Towers]

Islamic sharia law that is what needed in Pakistan.

noooo
we don't want jahil mullahs with zero education of islam looking for the moon whilst Kandeel Balouch is on his knees

 

[AZ1]

noooo
we don't want jahil mullahs with zero education of islam looking for the moon whilst Kandeel Balouch is on his knees

Then how can you expect that you going to win the war with ALLAH's help? when you don't even want to implement his law in your country?

 

[Trango Towers]

Then how can you expect that you going to win the war with ALLAH's help? when you don't even want to implement his law in your country?

His laws are not the mullah laws...some though isis was creating an islamic state too. Taliban in Afghanistan also claim an islamic emirate. Is it?
Laws of allah are just and compassionate as is Allah. When you have jahils at the helm it creates anarchy.

 

[AZ1]

His laws are not the mullah laws...some though isis was creating an islamic state too. Taliban in Afghanistan also claim an islamic emirate. Is it?
Laws of allah are just and compassionate as is Allah. When you have jahils at the helm it creates anarchy.

How would you know as it's not been implemented yet? we all seen what democrazy has done to Pakistan. How come jahils are not ruling the country for last 30 years or so in democracy?. I see it as excuse of not implementing it.