What's new

UK mosque registration plans is a secular oxymoron

Does secular british state have the right to dictate private religious beliefs of any faith?


  • Total voters
    14
DO u even know that qadiyanis don't know anything other than following their british masters like zombies? :coffee:

Can u as a liberal qadiyani tell me what do u mean by extremist imam? What constitute extremism? For eg. if someone state facts such as qadiyanis are non-muslim or that homosexual acts r immoral and sinful and that there is an islamic punishment for such acts in an islamic state. Or that celebrating Christmas is prohibited for muslims. Does that imam fall into the definition of extreme? Like it or not muslims don't believe in the non-sense that individuals have absolute freedom and is an entity detached from social obligations. Ideas emanating from liberalism is bound to clash with islamic beliefs. The intolerant secular UK gov is saying that beliefs clashing with liberal values are extreme and leads to terrorism and they r ready to persecute anyone disagreeing with liberal values . Do u as a qadiyani get it now?



The UK is not a muslim country, they are free to have laws that they feel best. If Muslims have a problem with it, they are encouraged to immigrate. You are not even in this country, why are you worrying so much?

An extremist is anyone who calls for the murder or persecution of anyone unjustly. What's your definition of an extremist? Anyone who doesn't believe with your Jamaati beliefs? Do you as a jamati get it?

They don't run to UK because they consider UK friend of Islam

They run here for the money. What a piety, Muslims are running to an Anti-Islamic country for worldy gain. Tch tch.

Or maybe this country isn't anti Islamic as portrayed by the likes of you?
 
.
Liberal secular states don't even recognize its minorities as minorities and as such can commit atrocities against them under numerous excuses. Unlike liberalism/secularism , islamic sharia recognizes minorities as minorities and gives them due rights . That was the case with all the multicultural islamic empires for 1400 years. Even today minorities in post-colonial degraded secular muslims states enjoy far more rights than minorities of the west , china , india or russia. Its really amusing when these intolerant secular shitholes of the west dare lecture muslims on minority rights.

And Add "Yes(they need to kick them out!)" the poll will be full :P

Their country their law don't like it dont go there ...Catholic schools in poland are registered and working legal why should muslims schools work like a sect?

Most british muslims r natives , born & raised in Britain. Native white brits r accepting islam becoming muslims in droves. :yahoo: How can u kick out natives from their native land? :unsure:

Did u read the article. Its mosque , a religious place of worship. According to secularism the state has no business with the affairs of religious places. Are u saying secular = hypocrisy and intolerance? Its a fact that secularism is a intolerant hypocritical ideology and inherently anti-religion but r u ready to accept and admit this fact?

Luffy is getting salty over what quite a few muslim countries do including turkey . UK is one of the most multicultural nation on this planet . See first hand how they treat their minorities. They ever restructured their exams around Ramzan so that Muslim students are not under undue stress during exam . Compare it to how Muslim countries treat their immigrant Muslims leave alone minorities .

majority Mosque & Madrassas in majority muslim countries r independent. Historically mosques and Madrassas were also independent in islamic empires. The gov take over of Madrassas in muslim countries are a post-colonial phenomenon.

Religious places of worship in the west are also independent by law. Communist shitholes interfered into private beliefs of its citizens.

Most of the muslim world apart from a select few are secular shitholes ruled by secular dictators. SO its natural that they won't treat muslims well.

Non-muslims live lavish lives in most of the secular muslim majority shitholes.



Well I don't see how this is a bad thing, seeing from my own experiences how many madrassas have been trying to hide under the radar for years. The government is also really training its sights in particular sects i.e. the Salafis, who have been exposed on numerous programs peddling nonsense in their schools. It's not just Muslims either, read this;

Charedi Talmud Torah Tashbar: Stamford Hill Jewish school that does not teach English ordered to close | Home News | News | The Independent

I think i won't be wrong if i say u r absolutely ignorant of what salafism is. It seems islam doesn't suit your notions regarding life and it is an obstacle to full filling your desires. That's understandable but what's not understandable is why resort to supporting underhanded , unlawful tactics & lies to suppress something u hate? ....................like u r defending this neo-con anti-islamic british gov that bombs muslims in ME and lectures its muslim minorities at home abt their beliefs.

If u didn't know mosque r NOT schools.

Btw u r pretty good at using/abusing your power as a mod like u did in that religious thread (supposedly banned on PDF) on christmas that u opened. I didn't know that there r different rules for members & moderators on secular liberal PDF.

ALL schools here are beeing inspected, since all schools have to meet certain requirements.
A "muslim" school, not teaching the pupils about Christianity would be shut down.
Likewise a Christian school, not teaching pupils about Islam would be shut down.
And agitating against groups of people due to their race, religion or sexuality
can be unlawful, depending aggressiveness.
A "Madras", only teaching the Qur'an and not math, history etc would not be acceptable.
Most certainly, schools will and should be shut down if they do not follow the guidelines.

If Muslims believe in something which is against local laws,
then they need to work to have these laws changed.
If they cannot produce a convincing argument,
then they need to comply, or leave.

Mosque are NOT schools. Is it that hard to understand.

Why should muslim kids learn christianity or christians learn any religion other than christianity in school in a secular state? What business does a secular state have in dictating religion to kids? Seculars themselves scream their heart out lecturing others that a secular state allow all religious groups to practice their faith and doesn't interfere in religious institutes and places of worship. SO why this backtracking and hypocrisy when it comes to muslims? May be it has to do with the fact that secularism itself is political arm of the religion of liberalism and liberalism doesn't tolerate any religion that doesn't subscribe to liberal values. In other words liberalism is an intolerant religion that is inherently facist.

Btw when a muslim school has to teach christinaity , can it teach its people islam's view on Christianity? Or does it have to teach christinay from a catholic's or protestant's POV? Why should a secular state even dictate such a thing?

If u didn't know , sharia allows non-muslims to practice their faith in an islamic state. Muslims never gave excuses of multiculturalism to force convert non-muslims even though islamic empires for 1400 years were the biggest multicultural superstates. Muslims did justice with non-muslims something liberal western shitholes r incapable of doing with their minorities.............any minorities not just muslims. Muslims recognized its minorities as minorities and gave them due rights unlike liberal secular states .

What business does a liberal secular state have with thoughts and beliefs of its citizens? liberals prides themselves on freedom of speech and freedom of belief? :lol: So beliefs going against liberal values or values sanctioned by the majority is a crime now in liberal secular europe? :pop:

Every country has a right to register what is being built on its soil, mosques should be no exemption. If any mosque or any religious idea is against the country's laws or ideology, state has every right to dictate what should be taught on its soil. I don't know why we think there should be special treatment for our views everywhere.

SO every country has the right to oppress its minorities?

Who decides law of the land and who decides whether an idea goes against the law of the land? And why should any idea going against the law of the land be criminalized? if u didn't know one of the fundamental principles of making laws in hypocritical liberal secular states is that nothing can be deemed illegal unless it causes direct physical harm to individual members of the society. NO idea can be banned. They allowed blashphemy , prostitution , homosexuality etc based on that principles of individual consent and harm. Now they are debating incest and genetically modified babies.

Your ignorance baffles me. Muslims r NOT demanding special treatment. They r just demanding their basic right of practicing their faith peacefully , something secular states supposedly "guarantees". Now the right to teach your kids morality & religion is something special according u? Why do u hate muslims so much?

Ouffff.................Finally a reasonable Muslim member here. I was beginning to lose hope from some Islamist members here who seem to think the whole world and west is creating some sort of evil plan against Muslims. LMAO.
These people's delusions has no boundaries bro. You cant talk sense to them, just let them be.
At least we have some reasonable Muslim members here like you and my friend @xenon54 . So all hope is not yet lost.:tup:

That guy in exile is a qadiyani , NOT a muslim. Just making sure u r NOT mislead. :)

What's an islamist?

How r these people delusional? Is that boundary set by u?


Well, when you listen to some Muslim members like that guy making such claims, you understand why many middle eastern/Muslim countries today(including his own country) are so backward. No wonder many of them will rather run away to so called 'un-Islamic evil immoral' western nations than remain in their own 'holy moral' country. lol

If the majority of people in their countries think like him, then there is little hope that region will once again rise up/catch up with the rest of the modern world. :pop:

You don't need to tell him that. I'm sure many of them already know this. But they say something different for other reasons.

What claims did i make? I stated facts.

How do u define backwardness? What's constitutes backwardness?

Interesting u mention my country. My country is secular shithole ruled by a secular tyrant backed by other secular states including Britian. No wonder its a backward shithole.

Hello Mullah boy, If you want to teach hatred against others or that homosexuals should be murdered then gtfo out of UK oh wait you are not even in UK, you're not a British citizen either, your views does not count. Last time I checked Bangladeshi government is kicking your mullahs to the kerb.

Hello qadiyani. Its amusing to know that u being a british (assuming u r raised there) lack the very basic comprehension of english. When did i even say homosexuals should be murdered in UK in that post? Are u so pathetic at comprehension or u r so desperate to defend anti-islamic bigotry that u need to put up straw-men argument? No wonder u like the tyrannical BD goverment.

really? for someone to say "yes' in this poll they have to admit they are liberal? that shows how prejudiced the OP is. Why even bother with a poll?

YES Britain has a right to protect itself from any security threat and since mosques and masjids have had a pattern of radicalizing youth into terrorists, Britain has a right and DUTY to regulate them and watch what happens their. That can only be done if they maintain records of all such locations

A hindutvadi extremist like u should not be talking abt prejudice.

If u didn't notice , most of the people defending this bigoted anti-islamic policy of neo-con british gov are self-proclaimed liberals. This thread itself vindicates the poll options.

The UK is not a muslim country, they are free to have laws that they feel best. If Muslims have a problem with it, they are encouraged to immigrate. You are not even in this country, why are you worrying so much?

An extremist is anyone who calls for the murder or persecution of anyone unjustly. What's your definition of an extremist? Anyone who doesn't believe with your Jamaati beliefs? Do you as a jamati get it?

UK is a self-declared secular liberal state that bombs muslim countries to spread secularism and democracy. They lecture muslims on freedom of religion and claim how great and civilized they are.They r signatory to all the human rights treaties they themselves promoted and r based on their values. SO yes muslims anywhere in the world should have a problem when they see their fellow british muslims r targeted by a hypocritical anti-islamic gov. Muslims worry abt each other unlike qadiyanis who worry abt their british masters.

Point out where in that post i mentioned murdering someone unjustly? Lying and putting up strawmen argument r hallmark of qadiyanis . U can't write anything without lying can u ?
 
Last edited:
.
A hindutvadi extremist like u should not be talking abt prejudice.

If u didn't notice , most of the people defending this bigoted anti-islamic policy of neo-con british gov are self-proclaimed liberals. This thread itself vindicates the poll options.

in your meaningless troll you are missing the primary point - it is stupid to combine two or more data points, each with multiple options, into a single survey question. It simply invalidates the poll and the survey. Any high-school grad will tell you that. Secondly your assumption of me being an extremist of any kind, let alone hindutva, confirms the degree of lead poisoning you have been subjected to.
 
.
Most british muslims r natives , born & raised in Britain. Native white brits r accepting islam becoming muslims in droves.

Islam in the United Kingdom - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"The largest groups of British Muslims are Pakistanis and Bangladeshis" so native ....


Did u read the article. Its mosque , a religious place of worship. According to secularism the state has no business with the affairs of religious places. Are u saying secular = hypocrisy and intolerance? Its a fact that secularism is a intolerant hypocritical ideology and inherently anti-religion but r u ready to accept and admit this fact?

Can ask you the same ...

In response to the Gov proposal to register Madrassas, over 300 Mosques, Madrassas, Imam’s and teachers have signed a joint-statement on a campaign launched

Madrasa - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mosques ‘unequivocally’ rejects madrassa registration plans | Education Business


Liberal secular states don't even recognize its minorities as minorities and as such can commit atrocities against them under numerous excuses. Unlike liberalism/secularism , islamic sharia recognizes minorities as minorities and gives them due rights . That was the case with all the multicultural islamic empires for 1400 years. Even today minorities in post-colonial degraded secular muslims states enjoy far more rights than minorities of the west , china , india or russia. Its really amusing when these intolerant secular shitholes of the west dare lecture muslims on minority rights.

2013 Bangladesh anti-Hindu violence - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attacks on Bangladesh minority communities 'continue - BBC News

Christians in Bangladesh Accused of Witchcraft Narrowly Escaped Being Burned Alive

Deal with your own country then teach others ...
 
Last edited:
.
Did u read the article. Its mosque , a religious place of worship. According to secularism the state has no business with the affairs of religious places. Are u saying secular = hypocrisy and intolerance? Its a fact that secularism is a intolerant hypocritical ideology and inherently anti-religion but r u ready to accept and admit this fact?

Wrong.

It is the Church that has no business in the affairs of the state in a secular model, the converse doesn't apply.

The state still has the right to interfere in the affairs of the Church given it has a mandate and the legislative ability to do so if necessary.

Secularism is not an ideology, it is a set of principles, as I've had to explain to you a million times.

What you apparently fail to understand is that a secular state will not allow a church to overturn the very nature of that state and will legislate accordingly.

So yes a secular state will be intolerant of any denomination wanting to turn it to an Islamic, Judaic, Christian, or Atheist, (you getting the picture?) state.

Because doing so would favourite one set of people against the others, which isn't equality is it?

So what you're really arguing isn't that secularism is an "intolerant ideology" but that secularism will not allow your favourite people to have a one up against another set of people. You're arguing for inequality. Not very Islamic of you.

Religious places of worship in the west are also independent by law.

A sweeping generalisation.

They are not, they may be allowed a certain degree of independence but they must comply with common laws.

Why should muslim kids learn christianity or christians learn any religion other than christianity in school in a secular state?

Because it's part of the national curriculum and the state may possibly want educated citizens?

Are Muslim religious scholars not versed in the old testament and the Bible or other religious works? I believe the most credible ones are, then why shouldn't the rest of us be...

What business does a secular state have in dictating religion to kids?

None. If you lived in the west and attended a religious studies class you would know that.

SO why this backtracking and hypocrisy when it comes to muslims? May be it has to do with the fact that secularism itself is political arm of the religion of liberalism and liberalism doesn't tolerate any religion that doesn't subscribe to liberal values. In other words liberalism is an intolerant religion that is inherently facist.

Liberalism and secularism are not mutual.

Liberalism isn't a religion.

I don't think you know what fascism is...

Just because Liberalism is tolerant of minorities does not mean it will necessarily tolerate a minority that will seek to overturn the very nature of the state or do harm to others. You don't get a free pass to do whatever the feck you like and then scream intolerance and fascism when someone tells you to stop being a vagina.

Stop being a vagina.
 
.
I think i won't be wrong if i say u r absolutely ignorant of what salafism is. It seems islam doesn't suit your notions regarding life and it is an obstacle to full filling your desires. That's understandable but what's not understandable is why resort to supporting underhanded , unlawful tactics & lies to suppress something u hate? ....................like u r defending this neo-con anti-islamic british gov that bombs muslims in ME and lectures its muslim minorities at home abt their beliefs.

If u didn't know mosque r NOT schools.

Btw u r pretty good at using/abusing your power as a mod like u did in that religious thread (supposedly banned on PDF) on christmas that u opened. I didn't know that there r different rules for members & moderators on secular liberal PDF.

Oh that's where you are wrong, I'm quite informed on what Salafism is, and what a stain on the Muslim world it has become. It's no coincidence that the most brutal terrorist groups out there are Salafis/Salafi offshoots. Don't try to patronise me regarding how "Islam" isn't suited for me, Najdism isn't Islam. I follow my faith intently. Also what's underhanded regarding a registration scheme?
The British are bombing ISIS that's about it.

As for me "abusing" my moderator powers, coming from you I'll wear that as badge of honour. Nothing of the sort happened and you were told to keep your trolling posts away from my thread. If you still take issue, put up a thread in the GHQ section.
 
Last edited:
.
I can't comment on legal matters and what should be permitted or not. However, I take a philosophical/logical approach. I just can't understand why you would want to follow any Abrahamic tradition in a secular society. Abrahamic traditions are drastically different than secular traditions. You simply can't follow them in the secular society unless you isolate yourself. I will cut some slack for older generation which came to find economic opportunity and work hard. But, the new generation of children who are born in secular tradition should not be following Abrahamic tradition. Otherwise they won't be able to integrate themselves, they will have warped views of societal norms and catch depression. If your tradition is telling you everything being practiced in secular society is evil and ungodly, then you will as if everything is wrong with the world. You will begin developing bad views towards other humans. Then of course you will begin seeking different society, and some people will believe they have to work to restore religion. And this is why you get people like ISIS who feel God has been shunned and they need to create alternate society. That or they being questioning their beliefs and leaning to agnostic/atheist side.

This is why the blame partially lies on parents in secular society. They need to understand what they brought their children into, and can't expect them to be religious without any consequences. So they need to think early on, either take your kids back home after you're financially able. Or let them become who they need to be to be successful, social, and integrated into the society. It's very hard for Muslim teens to get this point across to their families. Therefore they begin acting on their own and might leave the house and no longer have relation with family. Some families try taking their children overseas for a certain period to try having cultural attachment to Islam. Again, these parents don't understand it's very back and white in secular society. You can't function properly unless you're one of three types of Muslims:

1. Older Muslim generation that came for economic reasons and raising children there
2. Converts to Islam at around late 20's/early 30's
3. Very secular Muslims who grew up integrated well and might become a little religious later in their lives
4. Muslims who grew up around lots of Muslims and only socialize with them but manage well

.....

If you are born in secular society and try growing up religious you will have big issues with integration. It doesn't work, period. So these kids in this category will become extremist or agnostic/atheist. Especially when they fear getting their point across to family. So this is all I wanted to say....

There is a point secular people have. And most people trying to be religious recognize this. Then there are those people who are irrational and think humans are machines that don't think this over. So they wanted hatred against Muslims or Westerners, etc...

Oh that's where you are wrong, I'm quite informed on what Salafism is and what a stain on the Muslim world it has become. It's no coincidence that the most brutal terrorist groups out there are Salafis/Salafi offshoots. Don't try to patronise me regarding how "Islam" isn't suited for me, Najdism isn't Islam. I follow my faith intently. Also what's underhanded regarding a registration scheme?
The British are bombing ISIS that's about it.

As for me "abusing" my moderator powers, coming from you I'll wear that as badge of honour. Nothing of the sort happened and you were told to keep your trolling posts away from my thread. If you still take issue, put up a thread in the GHQ section.

Don't think its necessary to ban him brother. He may be a Muslim in West facing identity crisis, he's not the first one. Let him discuss with us and slowly his thoughts will develop. I used to think like him, now my views changed drastically. Ive come to conclusion that abrahamic traditions are not compatible with secular ones. It took some times and a lot of thinking, evulation as well. Which is why I believe we should cut him some slack.

I don't agree with this panic and ban approach. Sometimes this discussion is needed, hostility between the two sides will just foster more angry. If we reduce hostility the discussions will be friendly and we will come to similair understandings.
 
.
I can't comment on legal matters and what should be permitted or not. However, I take a philosophical/logical approach. I just can't understand why you would want to follow any Abrahamic tradition in a secular society. Abrahamic traditions are drastically different than secular traditions. You simply can't follow them in the secular society unless you isolate yourself. I will cut some slack for older generation which came to find economic opportunity and work hard. But, the new generation of children who are born in secular tradition should not be following Abrahamic tradition. Otherwise they won't be able to integrate themselves, they will have warped views of societal norms and catch depression. If your tradition is telling you everything being practiced in secular society is evil and ungodly, then you will as if everything is wrong with the world. You will begin developing bad views towards other humans. Then of course you will begin seeking different society, and some people will believe they have to work to restore religion. And this is why you get people like ISIS who feel God has been shunned and they need to create alternate society. That or they being questioning their beliefs and leaning to agnostic/atheist side.

This is why the blame partially lies on parents in secular society. They need to understand what they brought their children into, and can't expect them to be religious without any consequences. So they need to think early on, either take your kids back home after you're financially able. Or let them become who they need to be to be successful, social, and integrated into the society. It's very hard for Muslim teens to get this point across to their families. Therefore they begin acting on their own and might leave the house and no longer have relation with family. Some families try taking their children overseas for a certain period to try having cultural attachment to Islam. Again, these parents don't understand it's very back and white in secular society. You can't function properly unless you're one of three types of Muslims:

1. Older Muslim generation that came for economic reasons and raising children there
2. Converts to Islam at around late 20's/early 30's
3. Very secular Muslims who grew up integrated well and might become a little religious later in their lives
4. Muslims who grew up around lots of Muslims and only socialize with them but manage well

.....

If you are born in secular society and try growing up religious you will have big issues with integration. It doesn't work, period. So these kids in this category will become extremist or agnostic/atheist. Especially when they fear getting their point across to family. So this is all I wanted to say....

There is a point secular people have. And most people trying to be religious recognize this. Then there are those people who are irrational and think humans are machines that don't think this over. So they wanted hatred against Muslims or Westerners, etc...



Don't think its necessary to ban him brother. He may be a Muslim in West facing identity crisis, he's not the first one. Let him discuss with us and slowly his thoughts will develop. I used to think like him, now my views changed drastically. Ive come to conclusion that abrahamic traditions are not compatible with secular ones. It took some times and a lot of thinking, evulation as well. Which is why I believe we should cut him some slack.

I don't agree with this panic and ban approach. Sometimes this discussion is needed, hostility between the two sides will just foster more angry. If we reduce hostility the discussions will be friendly and we will come to similair understandings.

Point taken bro.

As for the whole Abrahamic values are not compatible with secular values, I take it you refer to today? Christianity pretty much shaped Western civilisation. Yes there was a separation of church and state, but there still remained a harmonious dance between the two.
 
.
100% support this move. I am surprised that they have left it this late. I blame the UK government to have failed in it's obligation to it's citizens in failing to prevent intolerance taking root in this country which hurts everybody, Muslim and non Muslim alike.

Finally some counter-balance against the spread of Saudi sponsored Salafism. Hurray Cameron!!
 
.
The rants and bullshit spewed by OP is too much to respond to.. The audacity of asking for special rights and a cover for extremism in a liberal progressive country. Maybe crawl back to your jihadi shithole and enjoy all your rights there?
 
.
Point taken bro.

As for the whole Abrahamic values are not compatible with secular values, I take it you refer to today? Christianity pretty much shaped Western civilisation. Yes there was a separation of church and state, but there still remained a harmonious dance between the two.

I believe it's the opposite mate. It seems like Western peoples wanted less and less to do with Christianity, instead wanting logical/philosophical/reasonable approach to social matters. It all started at the thinking level. This is why I argue at that point, religious way of thinking was long diminished. I really don't recognize any Christian identity here in the West. I recognize industrial/secular identity. Even in the east, this is the case for some nations.

Muslims need to free up our thought more, and debate as to whether religion/secular society can be balanced into one. And if it can't, then what is the next step we take? Muslim Brotherhood tried presenting a model like that. Now Muslim Brotherhood is having trouble influencing the region. So seculars who believe dictatorship is needed are dominating, while the only opposition to them are literalist Muslims. This is a bad situation to be in, physical measures won't resolve the issue. It's at an ideological level, which I don't believe the people are ready to take. So we can only guess what will happen.

In the meantime, we should try assisting Muslims in secular societies on how to better adapt/integrate while retain their beliefs if that is what they want.

The rants and bullshit spewed by OP is too much to respond to.. The audacity of asking for special rights and a cover for extremism in a liberal progressive country. Maybe crawl back to your jihadi shithole and enjoy all your rights there?

Your approach isn't effective. You're bigger than that my friend. Use reasonable/friendly/logical arguments which will work in the long term. If we threw less slurs around and instead sought to educate, we would live in a better world overall. Literalists aren't stupid people, they just really fear escaping what they view as a reality(their faith). And hence want to try to convince themselves that religion as a working model in the 21st century. It's an ideological struggle for them as well.
 
.
Another gem of a thread by Lungi 500, I don't understand why this terrorist is even allowed to post
 
.
I believe it's the opposite mate. It seems like Western peoples wanted less and less to do with Christianity, instead wanting logical/philosophical/reasonable approach to social matters. It all started at the thinking level. This is why I argue at that point, religious way of thinking was long diminished. I really don't recognize any Christian identity here in the West. I recognize industrial/secular identity. Even in the east, this is the case for some nations.

Muslims need to free up our thought more, and debate as to whether religion/secular society can be balanced into one. And if it can't, then what is the next step we take? Muslim Brotherhood tried presenting a model like that. Now Muslim Brotherhood is having trouble influencing the region. So seculars who believe dictatorship is needed are dominating, while the only opposition to them are literalist Muslims. This is a bad situation to be in, physical measures won't resolve the issue. It's at an ideological level, which I don't believe the people are ready to take. So we can only guess what will happen.

In the meantime, we should try assisting Muslims in secular societies on how to better adapt/integrate while retain their beliefs if that is what they want.



Your approach isn't effective. You're bigger than that my friend. Use reasonable/friendly/logical arguments which will work in the long term. If we threw less slurs around and instead sought to educate, we would live in a better world overall. Literalists aren't stupid people, they just really fear escaping what they view as a reality(their faith). And hence want to try to convince themselves that religion as a working model in the 21st century. It's an ideological struggle for them as well.

I'm just tired of religion and imaginary stuff still governing humanity and wreaking havoc in this day and age.. It's frustrating..
 
. . .

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom