Farooq
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2010
- Messages
- 1,404
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
Territorial integrity only became a 'sacred principle' after WWII. Before that, as I'm sure you know, stronger nations annexed weaker nations left and right. So what Russia did in the 1700's, as every other imperial power, can't really be invoked.
atatwolf ran away from replying to me when he's normally so pugnacious. So what do you think?
@kalu_miah
pak-one is kind of a nutjob. He wants the durand line disbanded so "pashtunstan" can be restored. He has no concept of geopolitics or the nation-state. And he thinks of his own army as "slave and servant of America". I don't think he's ever advocated anything in Pakistan's interest.
Also, in truth, I am not opposed to granting Uighurs a state. There's little point in ruling a people so resistant and recalcitrant. But the problem is that it threatens the rest of China's territorial integrity, China's runaway economic growth, and our current rivalry with the USA. Our superpower status and America's collapse are two absolute prerequisites that must be guaranteed before we consider the issue of granting territorial cessions.
@Pak-one is a naswar eating pathan who should just stick to being a rickshaw driver and has no business discussing geopolitics with anyone
this terrorist sympathizer many times has ranted against the Pak army for killing his wahabi taliban friends, so its best to just ignore this little puppy
I can assure you majority of Pakistanis and Muslims around the world actually support the Chinese crackdown on these Uigers terrorist who are Saudi- funded wahabis like ttp, pak-one
Pakistan and China are facing a common enemy, which is western funded wahabiism !