You are not a very smart person. The only way to render a weapon obsolete or at least severely reduce its efficacy is to develop countermeasures to it, not by doing nothing. The ICBM interceptor program is one such program. The only thing you are good at is ignorantly yak about things you have not bothered doing even basic research.
Wait until you can intercept 9000 nuke missiles from Russia and China then you can call any of your interceptor works. Until then, you are just babbling about something that you know it does not even work.
Gambit, i belive that bringing peace to the world is not by threateing it with weapons which are fast and have high casuality rate, but by promoting brother hood, by promoting ethics of business so that one does not exploit other.
thats not going to happen as non of the states are going to launch them.
How the hell can you know something 'does not work' until you even try? Is this what Viet Nam had deteriorated to?
Nothing is preventing us from doing both, right? The problem with the world since the day man created ideological/political enclaves called 'nations' and 'nation-states' is that we created competing interests and sometimes they are do not merely compete but contrast then eventually conflict. Diplomacy attempts to reduce the odds of conflicts but in the event that is not possible, weapons protect those interests.
New Recruit
New Recruit
did somebody say "Military decline" 
Russian army: junks waiting to be dismantled!
yee yee yeeewet dreams!
instead worry about your regime in iran!
