chanikya
BANNED
- Joined
- May 5, 2011
- Messages
- 618
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
By all indications the countdown for a U.S. intervention in Iran has already begun and the only question that seems left is ... when exactly this will happen.
Everything seems to hang from a thin thread and the threats of Iran blocking the Straits of Hormuz increasing in frequency, and the administration of U.S. 5th Fleet retorted that it is not under any circumstances tolerate obstruction of traffic to and from the Persian Gulf. It is the first time that the U.S. react to the threats of Iran.
The leader of the Iranian Navy admiral. Habibollah Sayyari said today that Iran has effective control over the straits, and that is very easy to close the Strait of Hormuz. It is the second time in two days that Iran sent a threat to blockade the straits. Just yesterday, Vice President of Iran Mohamed Reza Rahimi government had threatened for the same if the West imposes sanctions on Iranian oil exports.
Effective 'signal' however the start of the countdown by the Council on Foreign CFR (Council of Foreign Affairs) with enormous influence on American foreign policy, in an article titled "It's time to hit Iran."
The CFR is an American non-kerdoskospikos body "think tank", which was founded in 1921 with headquarters in New York and Washington and its publications are believed to reflect in full the future movements of U.S. international scene, being the "center opinion "the most influential in American government.
So in an article circulating on the bimonthly publication of the Foreign Affairs.Journal for "January-February" columnist Matthew Kroenig former associate of the Pentagon proposes to carry out an attack on Iran now, before the latter acquired nuclear weapons.
"The truth is that a military blow to the destruction of Iran's nuclear program, if calculated correctly, could give the region and the world from a real threat and to improve dramatically in the long term national security of the U.S." Notes among others Kroenig.
Elsewhere in his article a former adviser to the Pentagon notes:
"The skeptics claim that an attack on Iran will fail, but even if achieved would trigger a general conflict and an unprecedented economic crisis. But what the latter can not understand the real threat that a nuclear Iran can represent the interests of U.S. Middle East and beyond. And the gloomy predictions that speak the "cure" is far worse than the "illness" itself. This is interpreted that an attack on Iran would be so bad or no? J worse than the possibility of Tehran acquiring nuclear weapons. "
But not only Kroenig's article which urges the U.S. presidency in an attack on Iran. A number of other publications converge in finding that something important in this direction is expected in the coming months.
The planning of the attack
The scenarios that move in circles of the Pentagon and U.S. Foreign focusing on a particular sequence of movements:
The U.S. will form a coalition that includes all countries of the region are threatened by a nuclear Iran. And that means practically all except three: Turkey, Israel and Saudi Arabia are at least formally will stay out of business.
Blockade of Iran by air and sea in order to stop all commercial traffic to and from Iran.
Selected strokes strategy texture on Iran's nuclear facilities and other strategic targets.
Extensive sabotage the territory of Iran, by opposition groups such as those held recently in Tehran and Isfahan, where in assessing destroyed at least 400 rockets killed the head of Iran's missile program and nearly cost the life of the Iranian President Ahmadinejad, but the religious leader Khamenei.
Interference at all government media, cyber online and probably use the E / M to the power supply network.
Also aim except destruction of nuclear facilities of Iran is the country's status. While not admitting that there is a plan the murder of Ahmadinejad and Khamenei, however, the overthrow of the regime and the ascension to power of other more moderate elements, who would be loyal followers of the ideology Khomeini, some that could come at a minor level of understanding with the individual international committee.
Any attempt for territorial intervention should be avoided, however, possible movement of Iran's neighbors will be repulsed.
Of the Americans estimated that no country in the region does not want Iran to acquire nuclear weapons that could one day turn against Israel, Turkey or Saudi Arabia or even against Iraq.
Regarding U.S. President estimates are that he is determined to carry out an attack and does not want to go down in history as the president who left Iran to acquire nuclear weapons.
Google Translate
Everything seems to hang from a thin thread and the threats of Iran blocking the Straits of Hormuz increasing in frequency, and the administration of U.S. 5th Fleet retorted that it is not under any circumstances tolerate obstruction of traffic to and from the Persian Gulf. It is the first time that the U.S. react to the threats of Iran.
The leader of the Iranian Navy admiral. Habibollah Sayyari said today that Iran has effective control over the straits, and that is very easy to close the Strait of Hormuz. It is the second time in two days that Iran sent a threat to blockade the straits. Just yesterday, Vice President of Iran Mohamed Reza Rahimi government had threatened for the same if the West imposes sanctions on Iranian oil exports.
Effective 'signal' however the start of the countdown by the Council on Foreign CFR (Council of Foreign Affairs) with enormous influence on American foreign policy, in an article titled "It's time to hit Iran."
The CFR is an American non-kerdoskospikos body "think tank", which was founded in 1921 with headquarters in New York and Washington and its publications are believed to reflect in full the future movements of U.S. international scene, being the "center opinion "the most influential in American government.
So in an article circulating on the bimonthly publication of the Foreign Affairs.Journal for "January-February" columnist Matthew Kroenig former associate of the Pentagon proposes to carry out an attack on Iran now, before the latter acquired nuclear weapons.
"The truth is that a military blow to the destruction of Iran's nuclear program, if calculated correctly, could give the region and the world from a real threat and to improve dramatically in the long term national security of the U.S." Notes among others Kroenig.
Elsewhere in his article a former adviser to the Pentagon notes:
"The skeptics claim that an attack on Iran will fail, but even if achieved would trigger a general conflict and an unprecedented economic crisis. But what the latter can not understand the real threat that a nuclear Iran can represent the interests of U.S. Middle East and beyond. And the gloomy predictions that speak the "cure" is far worse than the "illness" itself. This is interpreted that an attack on Iran would be so bad or no? J worse than the possibility of Tehran acquiring nuclear weapons. "
But not only Kroenig's article which urges the U.S. presidency in an attack on Iran. A number of other publications converge in finding that something important in this direction is expected in the coming months.
The planning of the attack
The scenarios that move in circles of the Pentagon and U.S. Foreign focusing on a particular sequence of movements:
The U.S. will form a coalition that includes all countries of the region are threatened by a nuclear Iran. And that means practically all except three: Turkey, Israel and Saudi Arabia are at least formally will stay out of business.
Blockade of Iran by air and sea in order to stop all commercial traffic to and from Iran.
Selected strokes strategy texture on Iran's nuclear facilities and other strategic targets.
Extensive sabotage the territory of Iran, by opposition groups such as those held recently in Tehran and Isfahan, where in assessing destroyed at least 400 rockets killed the head of Iran's missile program and nearly cost the life of the Iranian President Ahmadinejad, but the religious leader Khamenei.
Interference at all government media, cyber online and probably use the E / M to the power supply network.
Also aim except destruction of nuclear facilities of Iran is the country's status. While not admitting that there is a plan the murder of Ahmadinejad and Khamenei, however, the overthrow of the regime and the ascension to power of other more moderate elements, who would be loyal followers of the ideology Khomeini, some that could come at a minor level of understanding with the individual international committee.
Any attempt for territorial intervention should be avoided, however, possible movement of Iran's neighbors will be repulsed.
Of the Americans estimated that no country in the region does not want Iran to acquire nuclear weapons that could one day turn against Israel, Turkey or Saudi Arabia or even against Iraq.
Regarding U.S. President estimates are that he is determined to carry out an attack and does not want to go down in history as the president who left Iran to acquire nuclear weapons.
Google Translate
Here's my post from another thread on the same news:
They must judge their capabilities and other aspects related to going on war with US and its allies. 
Such a war could not only militarily destroy Iran but can cause massive damage to Iran's economy, which is doing quite well. 
US probably wants Iran to make its 1st mistake so that it can have a reason to go to war with Iran. 
