What's new

Type 052D DDG News & Discussions

He is old, must be suffering from dementia. PLAN comparable to Argentina Navy from the 80s? :lol:
This is 2016, he should be doing more homework before making himself look like a fool. PLAN's inventory is more than enough to strike fear into the hearts of Japanese Navy. We have > 60 subs that alone can deal a heavy blow, by 2021 we will most likely have 30 modern destroyers at our disposal, even whispering DF-21Ds Japanese will be crapping in their pants.
 
When China is serious and strong, Japan is not that much to worry about.

He is old, must be suffering from dementia. PLAN comparable to Argentina Navy from the 80s? :lol:
This is 2016, he should be doing more homework before making himself look like a fool. PLAN's inventory is more than enough to strike fear into the hearts of Japanese Navy. We have > 60 subs that alone can deal a heavy blow, by 2021 we will most likely have 30 modern destroyers at our disposal, even whispering DF-21Ds Japanese will be crapping in their pants.
This kind of selected dementia really make me wanna throw up sometimes.
 
China’s Growing Naval Power Confronts Western Threats
Military Analysis: The Type 052D Class Guided Missile Destroyer

SouthFront: Analysis & Intelligence is continuing to study the balance of powers in the Indo-Asia-Pacific region. China has already contributed and is contributing many resources to the modernization of its Navy. The growing Chinese naval power is the main reason of the US’s attention to the South China Sea and the whole American policy aimed to restrain the Chinese expansion in the region. In turn, without a powerful Navy, China won’t be able to continue pursue own geopolitical goals and defend crucial maritime routes.

Introduction

When most people think of a modern warship, they envision a sleek vessel with a stealthy superstructure, an advanced sensor and communications capability, a vertical launch system (VLS) and a balance of anti-submarine warfare (ASW) and anti-aircraft warfare (AAW) capabilities. The U.S. Arleigh Burke Class DDG is the poster boy of modern surface warfare ships. For many years, and arguably for many more to come, the Arleigh Burke Class DDG has been at the cutting edge of naval combatant design. It is; however, no longer alone.

Many nations that have advanced naval capabilities took notice when the first Arleigh Burke Class DDG came in to service, and immediately set out to learn from its strengths and to avoid its weaknesses. A number of nations incorporated into the U.S. defense structure, set out to build similar platforms with the same combat management system and defensive and offensive capabilities. Nations that found themselves outside this defense structure, and often times the target of a robust and adversarial U.S. defense posture decided to go “back to the drawing board” and design a vessel that could not only incorporate the strengths of the Arleigh Burke Class, but one that could exceed them. They decided to design a better vessel.

The Chinese People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) was a force in need of modernization at this point. Chinese destroyers lacked the AAW capability to defend themselves beyond the range of land-based anti-aircraft missile batteries. With this in mind, China did not possess a “blue water” navy. In order to expand the effective range of its naval forces and to acquire the ability to project power farther out to sea, the PLAN needed modern warships that could both protect themselves and defeat an opponent.

The Chinese government would embark on the most extensive naval modernization program in modern history, one that has seen the PLAN grow from an antiquated coastwise navy to a truly potent blue water force. The crowning achievement of this effort is the Type 052 (NATO designation: Luyang-III) Class DDG.

Development history

The Type 052D Class DDG is the latest development in the Type 052 family of destroyers. The Type 052D was proceeded by the Type 052C and Type 052B Class destroyers, with the Type 052C being China’s first vessel to have true long range fleet air defense capability. The Type 052C used the same hull and propulsion systems as the Type 052B; however, the superstructure design was modernized and an active electronically scanned phased array radar was fitted coupled to a VLS equipped with 48 HQ-9 anti-aircraft missiles. This gave the vessel stand-alone AAW capabilities previously lacking in all other PLAN vessels. The ship also carried a complement of 8 anti-ship cruise missiles, carried in two 4 cell launchers. Rounding out her armaments, the Type 052C carries a 100mm deck gun, 2 x 30mm close-in defense guns and 6 x 324mm torpedo tubes in two triple launchers. The vessel has an aft hangar and flight deck for one helicopter for support, reconnaissance and long range ASW defense. The first Type 052C, Lanzhou DDG-170 was commissioned in September of 2005.

1.jpg

Type 052C picture illustrating convex radar array panels and round VLS 6 cell launchers.


China continued to make rapid advancements in both missile technology, battle management systems and AESA multi-function phased array radars in the first decade of the 21st century, and a more powerful warship built on the Type 052C platform was designed. The new vessel was designated the Type 052D and would be equipped with more advanced detection and targeting systems and an ingenious modular VLS. This modular VLS sets the Type 052D apart from other DDGs in the navies of the world and is a true game changer for the PLAN.

Capabilities

The Type 052D is a true blue water navy warship. It hull and propulsion provide good seaworthiness, maneuverability and speed. Her AESA radar has obviously been improved with the most advanced such radar that China has produced. The easiest way to tell is by contrasting the flat panel phased array radar antennae of the Type 052D with the convex panel of its predecessor the Type 052C. This denotes that the newer vessel most likely has an improved version of the Type 348 radar that is also liquid cooled, as opposed to original the air cooled version. It is surmised that this new radar may be able to detect and track stealthy aircraft such as the F-35A/B Lightning II, but at what effective range is unknown.

2.jpg

Type 052D DDG.


The Type 052D has incorporated a brand new VLS system, which is also different from the Type052C VLS’s 6-missile cylinders. The new modular VLS is the most striking improvement of the new DDG. It is rectangular in design, with one 32 cell unit mounted forward of the superstructure and one 32 cell unit mounted aft. The VLS system resembles the U.S. Mk41 VLS, with no visible exhaust ports, which denotes that the system is either capable of cold launch, or the exhaust is vectored to a different location than its predecessor. Each VLS cell can house 4 missiles of different types. The VLS system is capable of launching surface-to-air missiles, anti-ship missiles, anti-ship cruise missiles including the YJ-18, anti-submarine missiles, and land attack cruise missiles. Such a system allows the Type 052D to be armed with a variety of missiles dependent upon the mission requirements. In theory, all VLS cells could be loaded with anti-ship missiles or anti-ship cruise missiles to create a powerful “Aircraft Carrier Strike Group Killer”. Such a load-out is imprudent, but possible. A more balanced armament would be most likely, and would be tailored to the mission, and with 12 vessels in the Type 052D Class planned, this represent a great deal of firepower.

3.jpg


Detail of differing VLS and AESA radar arrays of Type 052C and 052D Class DDGs.


YJ-18 Anti-ship Cruise Missile

The YJ-18 anti-ship cruise missile poses a significant threat to the U.S. Navy as well as any other potential adversary. It is believed that the missile has a subsonic cruising speed of roughly Mach 0.8 and then before striking its target it enters a terminal stage of supersonic speeds of up to Mach 3, which makes it extremely hard to intercept. The YJ-18 has an effective range of 290 nautical miles, with a theoretical threat area of 264,200 square nautical miles. This missile reportedly has an inertial guidance system fed by the BeiDuo Satellite System (BDS), often referred to as the Chinese GPS system.

Specifications:

Displacement: approaching 7,000 tons fully loaded.

L.O.A.: 156 m/ 511.8 ft.

Beam: 18 m/ 59 ft.

Draft: 6.5 m/ 21.3 ft.

Propulsion: Twin gas-turbine main engines, twin marine diesel auxiliaries.

Speed: 30+ knots.

Crew: 280

Weapons Systems:

64 cell VLS armed with any combination of ASW, ASCM, LACM, and SAMs.

  • CY-5 ASW missiles
  • HHQ-9 long range SAMs
  • DK-10A medium range SAMs
  • YJ-18 or YJ-83 ASCMs
  • CJ-10 LACMs
1 x H/PJ-38 130mm deck gun.

2 x 30mm remote control guns

1 x H/PJ-12 CIWS

1 x 24 cell launcher for HHQ-10 short range SAMs

2 x triple launchers for 324mm torpedoes

Aviation: Hangar and flight deck for 1 helicopter.

Building Project

One of the more striking aspects of the Type 052D DDG program is the rate at which these surface warfare platforms have been constructed. Building of the first vessel the Kunming DDG-172, was commenced in 2012. Since then, a total of nine vessels have been built, with a tenth under construction. Three vessels are currently commissioned and operating with the PLAN’s South Sea Fleet. A total of twelve Type 052D DDGs are planned before resources and efforts are put into the larger 055 Type DDG.

Base of Operations

It is no coincidence that all three of the active Type 052Ds (Kunming DDG-172, Changsha DDG-173, and Hefei DDG-174) are assigned to the South Sea Fleet and are based at the PLAN fleet naval base on Hainan Island. This sends a clear message to other claimants to disputed South China Sea islands and waters that China has the power and intention of backing their claims with force if necessary. These vessels also act as a strong access/area denial tool with their capable AESA radars and powerful AAW and ASW capabilities. With these vessels, the PLAN can create a large air defense umbrella over Chinese military operations and building projects in the region.

Future Development

The PLAN has been working on a larger and more powerful vessel than the Type 052D DDG that they call the Type 055 DDG. Although called a destroyer, a design displacement of over 10,000 tons (some sources suggest a displacement as large as 14,000 tons) would put the vessel into the category of a guided missile cruiser (CG). The vessel would most likely be designed as a fleet command vessel and powerful air defense platform for a future aircraft carrier strike group. Although construction has not yet begun on such a vessel, a mock-up to test the layout of radar arrays and other sensors, communications and information processing systems has been built in Wuhan, China. The vessel would likely be armed with two 64 cell VLS fore and aft of the bridge, a large deck gun in a stealthy turret, as well as a full complement of ASW weapons and close-in defense systems. Missile complement for the 128 total VLS cells would be similar to the Type 052, with the possible addition of more capable cruise missiles not yet disclosed. There would be hangar space aft for two helicopters as well as a flight deck.

5.jpg

Type 055 DDG/CG concept.


Conclusions

China has steadily modernized its navy over the past two decades, with an obvious acceleration in both its capabilities and acquisition of vessels in recent years. The PLAN is now fielding vessels that are arguably on par with western navies, and have a decided advantage over all other regional navies with the exceptions of Japan and Australia. In this case; however, they are rapidly gaining a numerical superiority.

The Type 052D guided missile destroyer is an extremely capable, modern surface warfare combatant that provides the PLAN with a strengthened and growing blue water capability. The PLAN will no longer be limited in its range of operations, dependent upon land-based air defense coverage. The Type 052D DDG can stand alone and defend itself from multiple threats. It is a great ASW and AAW platform for fleet defense and will be instrumental in development of a modern Chinese aircraft carrier battle group. With the acquisition of an aircraft carrier, and with a second currently being built, as well as three type 052D DDGs (of 12) and four Type 071 LPDS (of 6) China has built a formidable access/area denial capability to reinforce its claims in the South China Sea. It is important to note that China has gained this capability in just the past decade. Additional vessels of smaller displacement such as the Type 054A Class frigate and Type 056 Class corvette have also been built in large numbers in the same time period.

As nations with conflicting claims in the South China Sea are faced with going into battle against a Chinese navy that has exponentially grown in size and capability, they may see military confrontation as exceedingly futile. A naval alliance of opposing claimants has been building in response, with Vietnam and the Philippines joining forces with non-claimant nations such as Indonesia, Australia and the United States. An added urgency has recently manifested itself in recent “freedom of navigation” operations on the part of this alliance, with both the U.S. and now Australia flying aircraft over Chinese island building projects in the Spratly Islands. Tensions are increasing with the U.S. sending the Arleigh Burke Class USS Lassen DDG-82 and a number of flights of aircraft, including B-52 strategic bombers within twelve miles of the islands.

If China can avoid being drawn into a conflict early on, and gain the time required to establish its artificial island bases in the region and complete the commissioning of the modern naval vessels already being built, the nation will be at a distinct advantage. China has the resources, ingenuity and manpower to win a naval arms race with its neighbors. Chinese ability to control access to the South China Sea and effectively control this entire area is just a matter of time.

Written by Brian Kalman for SouthFront: Analysis & Intelligence. Brian Kalman is a management professional in the marine transportation industry. He was an officer in the US Navy for eleven years. He currently resides and works in the Caribbean.

The original source of this article is South Front
Copyright © Brian Kalman, South Front, 2016

China’s Growing Naval Power Confronts Western Threats | Global Research - Centre for Research on Globalization
 
Trying to compare argentina navy to PLAN is simply a joke. Somalia navy is compare to USN. Happy? :lol:

No its not. I mean after all, people like to point out how the U.S. Navy had a hard time with submarines during exercises which is the largest and most powerful in the world. Imagine how hard time China will have eh?:-)
 
No its not. I mean after all, people like to point out how the U.S. Navy had a hard time with submarines during exercises which is the largest and most powerful in the world. Imagine how hard time China will have eh?:-)

I think China can easily catch up with the USN in the near future.

- China has two production lines for the aircraft carrier, the US currently has one.

- China has three production lines for the cruiser/destroyer, the US currently has two.

- China will soon open the second production line for the nuclear sub, the US currently has two.

So it doesn't take an Einstein brain to figure out this major trend.
 
Last edited:
Sorry, the submarines Brits had were nuclear subs that Japanese don't have. China have over 15 nuclear subs(accurate number no one know, we just know the number was added at least one per year), China also have over 70 conventionally-powered submarines.

Its not the question of nuclear submarines or not. Its a submarine. And considering Japan is near home, they don't need a nuclear boat. Dozens of submarines is dangerous to China's Navy no doubt that. There are many targets for the Japanese.

How many ships Argentinean Navy have ? How many ships PLAN ? Which one have the most missiles hit to enemy's land ? :rofl:


China type054A FFG's VLS cells already install Yu-8 "China ASROC", not CY-1 .... Yu-8 is the standard VLS-launched anti-sub rocket-boosted torpedo for PLAN ships.

News photos to prove PLAN VLS-launched anti-sub rocket-boosted torpedo: Yu-8 "China ASROC"
1-jpg.265467


Source: Leio's PLA military photos (kinds of military equipments) | Page 69

Its not the question of ships capable of hitting land. I mean just the British submarines kept the Argentinean Navy away. Not because they massively bombing Argentina all over the place on its soil. Which it never happened.

I think China can easily catch up with the USN in the near future.

- China has two production lines for the aircraft carrier, the US currently has one.

- China has three production lines for the cruiser/destroyer, the US currently has two.

- China will soon open the second production line for the nuclear sub, the US currently has two.

So it doesn't take an Einstein brain to figure out this major trend.

Like I've said in my previous post, if previous exercises where the U.S. Navy had a hard time taking on submarines, can you imagine how hard China will have if they built up the numbers where the U.S. Navy is?
 
Its not the question of nuclear submarines or not. Its a submarine. And considering Japan is near home, they don't need a nuclear boat. Dozens of submarines is dangerous to China's Navy no doubt that. There are many targets for the Japanese.

Without the air superiority, it is a hopeless battle for Japan against China.

China's powerful air superiority and surface fleet will soon flush out Japan's few AIP subs.

PS, China's AIP subs are by far in larger number with more advanced cell fuel standard compared to the 1990s Swedish Stirling engine.

Like I've said in my previous post, if previous exercises where the U.S. Navy had a hard time taking on submarines, can you imagine how hard China will have if they built up the numbers where the U.S. Navy is?

The US navy will have a hard time to simultaneously deal against a large number of nuclear subs with its surface fleet keeps at bay.

However, to deal with a measly 6 conventional subs aren't a major challenge for the USN.

Come on, Japan is just your little pet, you pretend it is so powerful even at the expense to downgrade your own capability?
 
Without the air superiority, it is a hopeless battle for Japan against China.

China's powerful air superiority and surface fleet will soon flush out Japan's few AIP subs.

PS, China's AIP subs are by far in larger number with more advanced cell fuel standard compared to the 1990s Swedish Stirling engine.

Air superiority is important, but to modern subs they are not as affected by it since they can stay in the waters for months except for food based on endurance. And China cannot wait for months with trade and Navy ships stuck in port.

The US navy will have a hard time to simultaneously deal against a large number of nuclear subs with its surface fleet keeps at bay.

However, to deal with a measly 6 conventional subs aren't a major challenge for the USN.

Come on, Japan is just your little pet, you pretend it is so powerful even at the expense to downgrade your own capability?

Submarines are very dangerous. Testing a Swedish, Australian or French submarines against the U.S. Navy with just one of their boats shows how dangerous they are. And Japan doesn't have 6 conventional boats. They have dozens.
 
Air superiority is important, but to modern subs they are not as affected by it since they can stay in the waters for months except for food based on endurance. And China cannot wait for months with trade and Navy ships stuck in port.



Submarines are very dangerous. Testing a Swedish, Australian or French submarines against the U.S. Navy with just one of their boats shows how dangerous they are. And Japan doesn't have 6 conventional boats. They have dozens.

It is true for the modern nuclear subs which can silently sail at 20 knots for 3 months.

However, the conventional subs are severely restricted by its battery power. An AIP sub can only stay at 1-2 knots in order to remain silently underwater for a month.
 
It is true for the modern nuclear subs which can silently sail at 20 knots for 3 months.

However, the conventional subs are severely restricted by its battery power. An AIP sub can only stay at 1-2 knots in order to remain silently underwater for a month.

True, the pros and cons of conventional subs, but the pros outweighs the cons and depending on the situation.
 
True, the pros and cons of conventional subs, but the pros outweighs the cons and depending on the situation.

Well, China has by far a larger number of AIP subs to play the ambushing role in the littoral waters around the East China Sea and South China Sea.

Then it should be a by far a larger threat for the USN to sail in the vicinity according to your logic.
 
Well, China has by far a larger number of AIP subs to play the ambushing role in the littoral waters around the East China Sea and South China Sea.

Then it should be a by far a larger threat for the USN to sail in the vicinity according to your logic.

Indeed, the submarine threat the most major problem for the U.S. Navy than over other threats even DF-21 because they can see that and counter it with anti ballistic defense. Best way to hunt submarines is another submarine. But that takes time.
 
Indeed, the submarine threat the most major problem for the U.S. Navy than over other threats even DF-21 because they can see that and counter it with anti ballistic defense. Best way to hunt submarines is another submarine. But that takes time.

We should ask about @Martian2 how much effort needs to counter against 6-7 first generation AIP subs like the Soryu class.
 
I think China can easily catch up with the USN in the near future.

- China has two production lines for the aircraft carrier, the US currently has one.

- China has three production lines for the cruiser/destroyer, the US currently has two.

- China will soon open the second production line for the nuclear sub, the US currently has two.

So it doesn't take an Einstein brain to figure out this major trend.

China Navy would overpass USN in quantity , for sure , If US doesn't have any sudden demand to increase their fleet.
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom