What's new

Two Indian soldiers killed in LoC skirmish: Indian army

Even some indians were boasting about unmarked mass graves in Kashmir. With record so far indian troops are genocidal force.
 
Right. Whoever did this, did this with the full knowledge (and intent) that it would gain a lot of attention. They were definitely not hoping that it would go unnoticed. Unfortunately, there are so many groups who would benefit from the peace process getting waylaid, that we will probably never know who's idea it was.

It could be the TTP, to make sure that the pak army's focus shifts to the eastern front again. It could be any of the Kashmiri militants. It could be elements within the pak army itself, who don't want peace with India, or who don't want to fight the homegrown militants anymore, or want more control of national resources. It could be elements within the Indian army, for the exact same reasons. There are N number of vested interests whom this event could help.

OR could it be just plain one upmanship? and the mutilation is to teach a lesson? sometimes things are as simple as that.
 
Right. Whoever did this, did this with the full knowledge (and intent) that it would gain a lot of attention. They were definitely not hoping that it would go unnoticed. Unfortunately, there are so many groups who would benefit from the peace process getting waylaid, that we will probably never know who's idea it was.

It could be the TTP, to make sure that the pak army's focus shifts to the eastern front again. It could be any of the Kashmiri militants. It could be elements within the pak army itself, who don't want peace with India, or who don't want to fight the homegrown militants anymore, or want more control of national resources. It could be elements within the Indian army, for the exact same reasons. There are N number of vested interests whom this event could help.


That theory has an uncanny resemblance to the script of "The Sum of all fears"
 
Typical signature of terrorists given cover to intrude across LOC using the thick fog for advantage. 400 meter intrusion should be taken into consideration.
 
OR could it be just plain one upmanship? and the mutilation is to teach a lesson? sometimes things are as simple as that.

Or it might be that, however.. then the tools would not be regular troops or troops at all.. Rather non-state forces that can carry out those acts(and are willing to mutilate/maime etc).
 
This is not specific to Pakistan. Indian occupation, intrusion and killing goes on with all neighbors. So obviously people will speak up against indian intrusion and killing.

first of all India faces threats from many fronts because in every neighboring country there are anti Indian elements who are ready to wage war on India and we cannot remain silent and let ourselves die . They try to harm our integrity will do it back to them. It is very fair. No cry no trauma.

Secondly we have always remained in a calm state and have always tried to solve things at international level dialogue. That is the goodness of India.
 
OR could it be just plain one upmanship? and the mutilation is to teach a lesson? sometimes things are as simple as that.

Shooting or shelling could be just that. But if an order was given to decapitate a dead body and bring back the head as a trophy, whoever gave that order had a lot more sinister designs, than just one upmanship. He would have known that it would generate public outcry, and whip up passions, and escalate the volatile situation.
 
Its 3:30 Am in Dehli. what the heck are you doing up??.. No work??
Naa worked during day, slept for 5 hours, woke up in night, its 3:15 am in my city.

BTW cover fire to terrorists have been given previously.

Propaganda by indians to divert attention from their ambush on pakistani martyr....
Go to Indian channels, more focus is given to Delhi rape case and Owasi csae.
 
first of all India faces threats from many fronts because in every neighboring country there are anti Indian elements who are ready to wage war on India and we cannot remain silent and let ourselves die . They try to harm our integrity will do it back to them. It is very fair. No cry no trauma.

Secondly we have always remained in a calm state and have always tried to solve things at international level dialogue. That is the goodness of India.

And there were rivers of honey and milk that flowed next to ganga.

Mon ami.. when advertizing, please look at your target audience.
History is testament that India has not been the explicit aggressor..
and that is the only thing you can take away.

its a dog eat dog world.. if your claim was true, India would not have lasted this long.
it knows its games and has its ways of playing them.. and plays them well.

Naa worked during day, slept for 5 hours, woke up in night, its 3:15 am in my city.

BTW cover fire to terrorists have been given previously.


Go to Indian channels, more focus is given to Delhi rape case and Owasi csae.

I think at some point, the fact that there is a Pakistani team present in India has also led to the Media being told to act responsibly.
 
Typical signature of terrorists given cover to intrude across LOC using the thick fog for advantage. 400 meter intrusion should be taken into consideration.

That is new bollywood vapor script, when would it premiere?
 
Shooting or shelling could be just that. But if an order was given to decapitate a dead body and bring back the head as a trophy, whoever gave that order had a lot more sinister designs, than just one upmanship. He would have known that it would generate public outcry, and whip up passions, and escalate the volatile situation.

Kargil war reveals how the uniforms think or in effect don't think of what would be the consequences...i would hedge my bet on this non thinking bit happening in number of instances which has brought matters to such a juncture. Also I think it was upmanship going by the flow of officers who visited the post that was allegedly attacked by Indian troops, and baying for blood in a gruesome manner is not unheard of..
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom