His pedophile comment did not come from out of the blue. I know that individuals sentiments. He should not have started since he was bound to loose anyway. Lastly I remember that the discussion concerned 4 people. Me, you, him and another user. 3 against 1. Besides I don't remember it that much and it is a closed topic for my part.
I repeat that if I had thought anyone was mocking Islam, I would have called that person out on it immediately as would have any other member posting on that thread. In fact, none of the posters thought that that member had insulted Islam.
We all had different people thanking our posts on that thread.
I recall a few other Saudi members were present as well. Besides, the discussion between us was over genetics. Different haplogroups originated in various regions, but the population they originated with often differs from our modern day populations. For instance, haplogroup U originated close to north east Africa & the Middle East 60,000 years ago, but it's said to have originated among the first few homo sapiens that migrated from Africa, & later divided in to subclades as the population broke off. Some haplogroups such as haplogroup L are present in Europe, but those people are considered to have been mixed with Persian or Indian merchants around the time of the Roman empire.
In modern times, the spread of Indo-European languages & people involves a combination of the Paleolithic Continuity theory & the Kurgan hypothesis. The Sub-Continent is a different story because it's mostly the north western regions that Indo-Iranians settled on, as did the Scythians later on. The spread of Indo-European languages towards the east over there occurred due to cultural dominance. As far as Semitic sources go, you should read up on Shem, Ham, & Japheth. Their story is interesting & it concerns the origins of mankind from a Biblical perspective, Islamic scholars refer to them as well sometimes.
Still English was imposed. English law. Just look at India or in some way Pakistan. The English left a marker there and elsewhere in their former colonies.
That's true, the English language for instance plays a vital role in our society today. Although, that is a good thing in many ways. I think that people should learn foreign languages, for the sake of education, communication, & even business purposes, but that doesn't imply that they neglect their own languages.
Well, how can they kick out their own citizens? From what I am aware of then that is illegal. At least here in Denmark unless in exceptional cases when the condemned has retained ties to his ancestral country despite being born in European country x or y.
I was actually referring to those immigrants that aren't their citizens. If they have provided them with their citizenship, then they are just going to have to prosecute criminals to the full extent of the law, & deal with them on their own.
If you colonize a country, import its people as cheap labor, impose your language, religion, culture etc. then you cannot come her decades later and cry about "non-English" people causing "trouble". Then deport the average John Smith, James Johnson etc.
The non-English people are only going to increase and London is already 40% "foreign". Same with Paris.
Sure that is correct.
I don't really agree with that view, it doesn't seem rational. Conquests & wars between nations have occurred since the beginning of time. It doesn't mean that you should hate that nation because of events that took place in the past. Similarly, regardless of what a colonial power did in the past, its people do not deserve to suffer from crime caused by foreigners, & they have the right to speak against it. Those immigrants were allowed entrance in to their countries for pursuing a better future & they should respect the local people & adhere to the laws of the land.
Well, far from all like their cultures/countries just because they happen to have ties to them. That is a irrational view. Looking at Europe and the world then the nationalists are doing a very bad job since nearly every major world city is now a mixture of cultures etc. and I don't see that changing. The world will face much more important issues than just race, language etc. In the last 100 years I believe that hundreds of languages have become extinct and several nationalist/fascist movements have failed big time.
If people bothered to take a genetic test they would realize how mixed all of us are by far and how vague the concept of nationalities/ethnic groups etc. is at the end of the day.
Which view is irrational? I still maintain that most people generally prefer to be around their own, practice their own cultures, & speak their own languages. In fact, that happens to be noticeable in even the most multicultural societies, although there are always going to be exceptions to the rule. There is nothing wrong with desiring to preserve your race, culture, & heritage. In fact, it is only natural for humans to desire that their descendants resemble them. Yes, many people today are mixed, but that mixture if present would have been diluted over time. I doubt an English person today would look different from his or her ancestors around during Roman times. There is no doubt that the world will face other important issues as well, but that doesn't necessitate ignoring your country, people, etc. Since you seem to be religious according to your posts, I don't think that I need to remind you that the diversity of humankind is actually considered a sign from God in the Quran.
Yes, more modifications, new laws etc. must come and I am sure they will come as this has been a steady thing for the past 40-50 years.
With the rapid rise of the population more jobs need to be created and I believe that this should be the main discussion point.
Have you got an idea as to what kind of laws are going to be introduced in the future? I have heard some rumors that new laws will be introduced after the crack down on illegal workers, but I can't confirm anything at the moment.
