Turks deploy more M60 tanks to Turks backed part of Syria to protect Muslims from Unbelievers

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

i can't watch it in here due to copy rights

I can see it in Canada.

 

[Malik Alashter]

I can see it in Canada.

Not here thanks tho

 

[MMM-E]

1. Armenians won against azerbayjan with hunting guns.

Azerbaijan had no even hunting guns in 1992 and Russian Army helped Armenians

as of 2018 rich and powerfull Azerbaijan can crush poor and weak Armenia like insect

4. Your pride..old turkic gokturks were ruled by Iranic clan, we were rulers and kings of turkic. Safavids were Iranic.

what about Iranic ?

Safavids were TURKS and including Safavids TURKS ruled Iran for over 900 years

 

[Shapur Zol Aktaf]

Azerbaijan had no even hunting guns in 1992 and Russian Army helped Armenians

as of 2018 rich and powerfull Azerbaijan can crush poor and weak Armenia like insect



what about Iranic ?

Safavids were TURKS and including Safavids TURKS ruled Iran for over 900 years

1. Russia, israel, turkey helped Azerbaijan. Russia will not allow Armenia to be crushed, elcibey had also these kind of big turkish talks, they even said we'll attack armenia with nukes now crazy ant-eater aliev is leader of azerbayjan, he has kurdish background. He thinks only about money and his family, not about winning war.

2. Researchers such as H.W. Haussig, S.G. Klyashtorny, A.N. Bernstamm, C. V. Findley, B.A. Muratov,R.R. Suyunov,D.G. Savinov, S.P. Guschin,Rona-Tas and R.N. Frye have pointed out that the origin of the Ashina is from the Iranian Saka-Wusun.

3. There seems now to be a consensus among scholars that the Safavid family hailed from Persian Kurdistan and later moved to Azerbaijan, finally settling in the 11th century CE at Ardabil. Traditional pre-1501 Safavid manuscripts trace the lineage of the Safavids to the Kurdish dignitary, Firuz Shah Zarin-Kulah. According to some historians including Richard Frye, the Safavids were of Turkicized Iranian origin.
Other historians, such as Vladimir Minorsky and Roger Savory, support the following idea:

From the evidence available at the present time, it is certain that the Safavid family was of indigenous Iranian stock, and not of Turkish ancestry as it is sometimes claimed. It is probable that the family originated in Persian Kurdistan, and later moved to Azerbaijan, where they adopted the Azari form of Turkish spoken there, and eventually settled in the small town of Ardabil sometimes during the eleventh century.

Firuz Shah Zarrin Kolah (Persian: فیروزشاه زرین کلاه, literal meaning in English: King Firuz of golden crown‎) was a Kurdish dignitary and the seventh in the ancestral line of Shaykh Safi Ardabili, the eponym of the Safavid dynasty of Iran.

In the pre-Safavid written work Safvat as-safa (oldest known extants manuscripts from 1485 and 1491), the origin of the Safavids is traced to Firuz Shah Zarin Kolah who is called a Kurd (from sanjār), while in the post-Safavid manuscripts, this portion "Kurd from Sanjar" has been excised and Piruz Shah Zarin Kollah is made a descendant of the Shi'ite Imams. The male lineage of the Safavid family given by the oldest manuscript of the Safwat as-Safa is:"[Sheykh] Safi al-Din Abul-Fatah Ishaaq the son of Al-Sheykh Amin al-din Jebrail the son of al-Saaleh Qutb al-Din Abu Bakr the son of Salaah al-Din Rashid the son of Muhammad al-Hafiz al-Kalaam Allah the son of ‘avaad the son of Birooz (Firuz) al-Kurdi al-Sanjāri.

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

These M60 tanks are not upgraded. Too vulnerable to Kornet.

 

[zectech]

Assad missed the opportunity to work with Erdogan to attack the PKK in the oil rich area of Northeast Syria. They could have used a united FSA to liberate them for Assad. Instead, Assad keeps the zionist warmongers in the mainly non-civilian Northeast Syria. A loss to the PKK would be a victory for Assad and could end the war and start the peace discussions. Why Assad is attacking the relatively low strategic and highly civilian population befuddles me.

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

Assad missed the opportunity to work with Erdogan to attack the PKK in the oil rich area of Northeast Syria. They could have used a united FSA to liberate them for Assad. Instead, Assad keeps the zionist warmongers in the mainly non-civilian Northeast Syria. A loss to the PKK would be a victory for Assad and could end the war and start the peace discussions. Why Assad is attacking the relatively low strategic and highly civilian population befuddles me.

YPG is backed by Yankees. Hell, even Turkey don't dare attack them. Assad did let Turkey take Afrin. Yankees won't like Turkey take an inch of land from Yankees backed part of Syria. Not now. Not ever.

 

[HAIDER]

Seems Turkey raise ISIS to neutralized Kurds , but situation is out of hand. Nodoubt , Kurds are huge threat which is sitting on Turkish border.

 

[925boy]

I replied to post which proposed that Assad will attack Turkish tanks with Kornet missiles. You are jumping like monkey to counter my posts without even reading properly.

I guess you're right. fail me.

 

[TaiShang]

Go Turkey!

 

[MMM-E]

YPG is backed by Yankees. Hell, even Turkey don't dare attack them. Assad did let Turkey take Afrin. Yankees won't like Turkey take an inch of land from Yankees backed part of Syria. Not now. Not ever

Assad and Iran so cried when Turkey took Afrin , Turkey doesnt give a sh1t to pathetic Assad and Iran

there are only 3 major players in Syria , the US,Russia and Turkey

if the US and Russia leave Syria , Assad , Iran , The US,S.Arabia and Uae backed terrorists will be kicked out of Syria

and Yankees can not save ugly smelly Pkk/Ypg terrorists
but Our first target is Idlib

Seems Turkey raise ISIS to neutralized Kurds , but seems situation is out of hand. Nodoubt , Kurds are huge threat for sitting on Turkish border.

ISIS and PKK/YPG are same dogs of the US to creat terror coridor in N.Syria

The US , The UK and Israel created ISIS

first The US , The UK and Israel backed ISIS invaded cities and secondly The US , The UK and Israel backed PKK/YPG took cities under the mask of fighting ISIS

Result : The UK and Israel backed PKK/YPG Terrorists invaded over 30% of Syrian territory ( oil and gas reserves ) under the mask of fighting ISIS

and PKK/YPG Terrorists killed and forced to move Arabs,Kurds,Turkmen from their land


Turkey kicked The US , The UK and Israel backed ISIS in Al Bab
Turkey kicked The US , The UK and Israel backed PKK/YPG in Afrin

and Turkey rule over 20.000 Turkish Army trained FSA soldiers , sooner or later PKK/YPG terrorists will be kicked out of Manbij , Kobani , Tel Abyad by the Turkish Armed Forces and FSA

Go Turkey!

no more your lies and cheap propaganda wont work ,, keep barking mangy dogs

Turkey is only country that fight against terrorist groubs such as ISIS , HTS , PKK-YPG in Syria

 

[TaiShang]

Turkey has right to be in Syria UN article 51 self defense

Wrong.

Probably this is what your Nazi Merkel media is telling you to promote your president.

The fact is you need UN authorization for such a military aggression against the armed forces of another state.

Otherwise, every country can use the excuse to invade the weaker party (such as in the aftermath of the assassination of Russian ambassador in Turkey by a nationalist-Islamist).

In fact, International Criminal Court ruled in two distinct cases that, unless directly attacked by the legal authority of a state, the concept of jus ad bellum cannot be utilized.

For instance, the ICJ case “Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America), 1986, ruled that the ban on the use of force should be recognized as a principle of international customary law (let alone law under the UN charter) with no exception.

There are other similar ICJ cases: Military and Paramilitary Activities in and Against Nicaragua - Nicaragua v. United States of America judgment of 1986, the Oil Platforms - Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America judgment of 2003, and Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo - Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda judgment of 2005.

They all prohibit use of force under the excuse of "imminent attack" or "threat of war."

Obviously, the state of Syria as represented and recognized at the UN never threatened Turkey with war.

The rogue elements that pose threat to Turkey have originally been supported and supplanted by Turkey itself. The whole world knows this.

So, your country will loose in any international court and it will never receive a UN mandate for attack to Syrian Army. Without UN authorization, any military adventure against the state of Syria is an act of aggression and illegal.

 

[T-Rex]

Turkey is in Syria by the invitation of the people of Syria. Here's the evidence:

 

[Nein]

Go Turkey!

Stupid chink

 

[MMM-E]

Wrong.

Probably this is what your Nazi Merkel media is telling you to promote your president.

The fact is you need UN authorization for such a military aggression against the armed forces of another state.

Otherwise, every country can use the excuse to invade the weaker party (such as in the aftermath of the assassination of Russian ambassador in Turkey by a nationalist-Islamist).

In fact, International Criminal Court ruled in two distinct cases that, unless directly attacked by the legal authority of a state, the concept of jus ad bellum cannot be utilized.

For instance, the ICJ case “Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America), 1986, ruled that the ban on the use of force should be recognized as a principle of international customary law (let alone law under the UN charter) with no exception.

There are other similar ICJ cases: Military and Paramilitary Activities in and Against Nicaragua - Nicaragua v. United States of America judgment of 1986, the Oil Platforms - Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America judgment of 2003, and Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo - Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda judgment of 2005.

They all prohibit use of force under the excuse of "imminent attack" or "threat of war."

Obviously, the state of Syria as represented and recognized at the UN never threatened Turkey with war.

The rogue elements that pose threat to Turkey have originally been supported and supplanted by Turkey itself. The whole world knows this.

So, your country will loose in any international court and it will never receive a UN mandate for attack to Syrian Army. Without UN authorization, any military adventure against the state of Syria is an act of aggression and illegal.

read about UN article 51 self defense

everybody should know its place ,,, Terrorists attacks Turkey from Iraq and Syria since 1990s
and tens of thousands of Turkish citizens were killed by Pkk-Ypg and ISIS Terrorists ( 1/3 of Pkk terrorists are Syrians ,, Ypg terrorists are full of Syrians )

even Syrian Regime support Pkk terrorists against Turkey since 1990s
Turkey has right to declare war on Iraq and Syria


You says that Turkey should do nothing and only watch how Terrorists kill another tens of thousands of Turkish citizens from Syria and Iraq

Turkish Army is also in Iraq , Turkey has 100% right to be in Syria and Iraq
no more tolerance to terrorists and terrorist supporter regimes-countries


and Syria is belong to Syrian People , not the US backed Pkk/Ypg terrorists , not criminal murderer Assad regime,Russia and Iran

so your communist terrorist friends will be destroyed eveywhere by the Turkish Armed Forces and FSA soldiers , as like We did it in AFRIN