Turkish TV interviews Syrian refugees in Turkey

[explorer9]

Again you are missing my point, let me clarify you in brief.

The democracy propagation by west is tool but who has provided that tool to the imperialist powers?

He has been in power since 2000's but he didn't try to bring genuine change in Syrian politics in all those years in power.

He is in power because of his Armed forces and of course some support of people ( All the dictators used to have support bases in the country they rule)

I have heard Turkish FM Ahmet davoutouglu's interview at the beginning of Syrian crisis when he was mediating, according to his statement " If Al-Assad would have declared free and fair election on his request he would have certainly won that" but the dictator choose the other way.

I have heard Al-Assad's interview at a time when Libyan crisis started, he said Syria is different Syria is the axis of anti Israel front and people support this policy (negative approach to hold the power)

In my opinion Al-Assad is as stubborn as any other dictator before him and he will have to bear the same fate.

If Syrian want Al-Assad then its there choice but i really do not believe in that now may be before as i do agree with Tirkish FM's 2011 statement that i have mentioned above.

Change is inevitable even in GCC shiekhdoms ....

 

[Abii]

Turks don't believe the stuff they're writing, I'm sure of it. Their attitudes are very similar to us Iranians in that if their leaders ask for support regarding a foreign matter, or if they feel like their leaders have put them in a situation that there's no way to turn back (like what Turkey has done in the Syrian situation), they will raise the flag and "man the check points" till the dust settles. We do the same all the time. Even though we don't agree with the Iranian regime, we always try to stick together till things return to normal a bit and then discuss with ourselves.

You guys know in your hearts what's going in Syria and I'm just going to end it right here.

 

[Syrian Lion]

Again you are missing my point, let me clarify you in brief.

The democracy propagation by west is tool but who has provided that tool to the imperialist powers?

He has been in power since 2000's but he didn't try to bring genuine change in Syrian politics in all those years in power.

He is in power because of his Armed forces and of course some support of people ( All the dictators used to have support bases in the country they rule)

I have heard Turkish FM Ahmet davoutouglu's interview at the beginning of Syrian crisis when he was mediating, according to his statement " If Al-Assad would have declared free and fair election on his request he would have certainly won that" but the dictator choose the other way.

I have heard Al-Assad's interview at a time when Libyan crisis started, he said Syria is different Syria is the axis of anti Israel front and people support this policy (negative approach to hold the power)

In my opinion Al-Assad is as stubborn as any other dictator before him and he will have to bear the same fate.

If Syrian want Al-Assad then its there choice but i really do not believe in that now may be before as i do agree with Tirkish FM's 2011 statement that i have mentioned above.

Change is inevitable even in GCC shiekhdoms ....

you still haven't answered my questions... WHY IS THE WEST AGAINST ALASAD PROPOSAL FOR ELECTIONS TO BE HELD UNDER THE UN MONITORING ?
Plus Turkey should not have said that Syria should do this or that.... that is called DIRECT INTERVENTION IN SYRIAN INTERNAL AFFAIRS... How would you like it if Syria said this country should hold elections because there are 10% people that are opposition?
I will repeat what I asked on my previous post...

Look answer my questions here please... because these questions will answer your own questions...

Why does the west refuse Alasad to hold elections under the UN eyes? If the west is claiming that Alasad has no popularity then there is nothing to fear because Alasad will lose... so why is the west worried??

Why is Alasad still in power?? If the majority of Syrian people wanted Alasad gone, wouldn't Alasad would be gone already? Trust me Syrians fear nothing but GOD, thus the power and the will people can't be stopped no matter what weapon you use or what you do... because nothing can stop the anger of the people.. so how come Alasad still in power?

Do you really think there will be democracy in Syria post-Alasad? Didn't you see Iraq? Libya? and etc......

Again Alasad has proposed many times to hold dialogues and even elections UNDER THE UN EYES... but the outside "opposition" and the west always refuse, why???

Last question... why is it bothering you if Syrians want Alasad for now? I don't care what you people call him... a dictator or stuff like that... all it matter to us Syrians is a strong leader who won't kneel down to the west. We Syrians want to keep Syria independent and sovereign... and the outside opposition is already under the west's control...

SYRIA IS FOR SYRIANS...

 

[explorer9]

you still haven't answered my questions... WHY IS THE WEST AGAINST ALASAD PROPOSAL FOR ELECTIONS TO BE HELD UNDER THE UN MONITORING ?
Plus Turkey should not have said that Syria should do this or that.... that is called DIRECT INTERVENTION IN SYRIAN INTERNAL AFFAIRS... How would you like it if Syria said this country should hold elections because there are 10% people that are opposition?
I will repeat what I asked on my previous post...

Look answer my questions here please... because these questions will answer your own questions...

Why does the west refuse Alasad to hold elections under the UN eyes? If the west is claiming that Alasad has no popularity then there is nothing to fear because Alasad will lose... so why is the west worried??

Why is Alasad still in power?? If the majority of Syrian people wanted Alasad gone, wouldn't Alasad would be gone already? Trust me Syrians fear nothing but GOD, thus the power and the will people can't be stopped no matter what weapon you use or what you do... because nothing can stop the anger of the people.. so how come Alasad still in power?

Do you really think there will be democracy in Syria post-Alasad? Didn't you see Iraq? Libya? and etc......

Again Alasad has proposed many times to hold dialogues and even elections UNDER THE UN EYES... but the outside "opposition" and the west always refuse, why???

Last question... why is it bothering you if Syrians want Alasad for now? I don't care what you people call him... a dictator or stuff like that... all it matter to us Syrians is a strong leader who won't kneel down to the west. We Syrians want to keep Syria independent and sovereign... and the outside opposition is already under the west's control...

SYRIA IS FOR SYRIANS...

How are so confident and sure that a dictator will allow free and fair election in the territory he holds.That he didn't do in four decades of clan rule.

The dialogue when needed most, Al-Assad took the opposite route and did not allow the discontent to take political shape within the country like the dictators before.

Al-Assad is not in power, he only hold his power in his Damascus palace and some other urban regions among the daily fighting and killing of ordinary Syrians

Depending on your definition of democracy, but chaos for sure for long time and retribution ofcourse.

Do you support Saddam Hussein's rule in Iraq ? where majority got the power with the help of democracy (and Iran)

There is not an absoluteness of Nation-state concept in the world, Turkey being a major regional power did right to advise Al-Assad to avoid the bloodshed and later on feeding and sheltering 100 of thousand Syrians.

Geographical boundaries, Clan rule, Monarchies all are man made and have their shelf life and their decline and fall is inevitable...

Syria is for Syrians for sure....but not for a clan.....

 

[Syrian Lion]

How are so confident and sure that a dictator will allow free and fair election in the territory he holds.That he didn't do in four decades of clan rule.

The dialogue when needed most, Al-Assad took the opposite route and did not allow the discontent to take political shape within the country like the dictators before.

Al-Assad is not in power, he only hold his power in his Damascus palace and some other urban regions among the daily fighting and killing of ordinary Syrians

Depending on your definition of democracy, but chaos for sure for long time and retribution ofcourse.

Do you support Saddam Hussein's rule in Iraq ? where majority got the power with the help of democracy (and Iran)

There is not an absoluteness of Nation-state concept in the world, Turkey being a major regional power did right to advise Al-Assad to avoid the bloodshed and later on feeding and sheltering 100 of thousand Syrians.

Geographical boundaries, Clan rule, Monarchies all are man made and have their shelf life and their decline and fall is inevitable...

Syria is for Syrians for sure....but not for a clan.....

Alasad said under the UN eyes.. so that answers your first two- three questions.. Alasad since the first month said there should be dialogue, and a large conference happened under the Vice President leading the conference in Damascus but the outside "opposition" didn't attend because their masters in the west said no...

I'm not Iraqi, so I have no business in Iraq.. I mind my own business and only worry about Syria....

Alasad said many times.. we welcome advises but we NEVER TAKE ORDERS....
I told you Syrians want to keep Syria independent and sovereign...

If Turkey is truly worried about the bloodshed in Syria.... then turkey can end it in weeks.. by not hosting and training terrorists, and giving them shelter and weapons...


and I repeat my questions again... because you still have not answered me....

Why is Alasad still in power?? If the majority of Syrian people wanted Alasad gone, wouldn't Alasad would be gone already? Trust me Syrians fear nothing but GOD, thus the power and the will people can't be stopped no matter what weapon you use or what you do... because nothing can stop the anger of the people.. so how come Alasad still in power?

And I add, the Syrian army is the Syrian people.. so why does still Syria have an Army?
And I know you gonna bring the sect ruling... but the soldiers out numbers the commanders and they can easily turn their weapons on their leaders...

 

[explorer9]

Alasad said under the UN eyes.. so that answers your first two- three questions.. Alasad since the first month said there should be dialogue, and a large conference happened under the Vice President leading the conference in Damascus but the outside "opposition" didn't attend because their masters in the west said no...

I'm not Iraqi, so I have no business in Iraq.. I mind my own business and only worry about Syria....

Alasad said many times.. we welcome advises but we NEVER TAKE ORDERS....
I told you Syrians want to keep Syria independent and sovereign...

If Turkey is truly worried about the bloodshed in Syria.... then turkey can end it in weeks.. by not hosting and training terrorists, and giving them shelter and weapons...


and I repeat my questions again... because you still have not answered me....

Why is Alasad still in power?? If the majority of Syrian people wanted Alasad gone, wouldn't Alasad would be gone already? Trust me Syrians fear nothing but GOD, thus the power and the will people can't be stopped no matter what weapon you use or what you do... because nothing can stop the anger of the people.. so how come Alasad still in power?

And I add, the Syrian army is the Syrian people.. so why does still Syria have an Army?
And I know you gonna bring the sect ruling... but the soldiers out numbers the commanders and they can easily turn their weapons on their leaders...

Nobody trust Al-Assad's words now except Mullahs of Iran & Lebanon and may be Russians, so free and fair elections under Al-Assad are more than doubtful

The outside opposition is outside because of Al-Assad's deeds; his repression forced them to leave the country. Ideally they must have been inside and under the same roof.

Al-Assad is still in power because his military infrastructure is damaged but still competent enough. Even Saddam & Qaddafi would still be in power if US&NATO would not have attacked them.

If you are not concerned with Iraq then refrain yourself from giving the example of Iraq (i know Iranian members will hack you here

Yes Syrian army is from Syrian people and many of them might be Sunnite and some of them defected too. The defectors have been instrumental of bringing in the military victories against their previous masters.


The opposition fighters can not uproot Al-Assad from Damascus with foreign military intervention otherwise it will be long civil war like congo, cambodia etc.

 

[Syrian Lion]

Nobody trust Al-Assad's words now except Mullahs of Iran & Lebanon and may be Russians, so free and fair elections under Al-Assad are more than doubtful

The outside opposition is outside because of Al-Assad's deeds; his repression forced them to leave the country. Ideally they must have been inside and under the same roof.

Al-Assad is still in power because his military infrastructure is damaged but still competent enough. Even Saddam & Qaddafi would still be in power if US&NATO would not have attacked them.

If you are not concerned with Iraq then refrain yourself from giving the example of Iraq (i know Iranian members will hack you here

Yes Syrian army is from Syrian people and many of them might be Sunnite and some of them defected too. The defectors have been instrumental of bringing in the military victories against their previous masters.


The opposition fighters can not uproot Al-Assad from Damascus with foreign military intervention otherwise it will be long civil war like congo, cambodia etc.

Alasad SAID UNDER THE UN EYES?? Do you understand that part??? if you don't, it means that the UN will do the elections and such....moving on...

I thought the "Syrian Revolution" was by the Syrian people. so why bring NATO and US?? That shows you that this "revolution" is not popular, that it requires NATO to topple the government.. what kind of revolution is that??
BTW there was no Libyan revolution, it was the NATO "revolution"..... what a shame...

and you still failed to answer my simple question

Why is Alasad still in power?? If the majority of Syrian people wanted Alasad gone, wouldn't Alasad would be gone already? Trust me Syrians fear nothing but GOD, thus the power and the will people can't be stopped no matter what weapon you use or what you do... because nothing can stop the anger of the people.. so how come Alasad still in power?

And I add, the Syrian army is the Syrian people.. so why does still Syria have an Army?
And I know you gonna bring the sect ruling... but the soldiers out numbers the commanders and they can easily turn their weapons on their leaders...

If you know Syria then you would know that Syria and Iraq had big problems.... so my answer is that majority of Iraqis didn't want Saddam so they made their decisions, and yes some might say it was a big mistake how they got rid of Saddam ( or the way they got rid of Saddam destroyed the country)... And btw Saddam army fell in one month, because the people didn't back Saddam.
and Syria is different, because in Syria the so called "revolution" is only backed by the west, turkey and gcc.. If Syrians backed this "revolution" Alasad would have been gone long time ago....

Well for the opposition who are outside, they were asked to come to Syria and have dialogue, but they refused, because they want to stay outside so it will be easier for them to get orders from the west... plus why are they still outside? Aljazeera and Alarabieyh and others are reporting that 70% of Syria under the FSA.. why don't they go back to that 70% where FSA is in control

The more we talk, the more you expose yourself, and you just don't wanna admit it....

 

[explorer9]

Alasad SAID UNDER THE UN EYES?? Do you understand that part??? if you don't, it means that the UN will do the elections and such....moving on...

I thought the "Syrian Revolution" was by the Syrian people. so why bring NATO and US?? That shows you that this "revolution" is not popular, that it requires NATO to topple the government.. what kind of revolution is that??
BTW there was no Libyan revolution, it was the NATO "revolution"..... what a shame...

and you still failed to answer my simple question

Why is Alasad still in power?? If the majority of Syrian people wanted Alasad gone, wouldn't Alasad would be gone already? Trust me Syrians fear nothing but GOD, thus the power and the will people can't be stopped no matter what weapon you use or what you do... because nothing can stop the anger of the people.. so how come Alasad still in power?

And I add, the Syrian army is the Syrian people.. so why does still Syria have an Army?
And I know you gonna bring the sect ruling... but the soldiers out numbers the commanders and they can easily turn their weapons on their leaders...

If you know Syria then you would know that Syria and Iraq had big problems.... so my answer is that majority of Iraqis didn't want Saddam so they made their decisions, and yes some might say it was a big mistake how they got rid of Saddam ( or the way they got rid of Saddam destroyed the country)... And btw Saddam army fell in one month, because the people didn't back Saddam.
and Syria is different, because in Syria the so called "revolution" is only backed by the west, turkey and gcc.. If Syrians backed this "revolution" Alasad would have been gone long time ago....

Well for the opposition who are outside, they were asked to come to Syria and have dialogue, but they refused, because they want to stay outside so it will be easier for them to get orders from the west... plus why are they still outside? Aljazeera and Alarabieyh and others are reporting that 70% of Syria under the FSA.. why don't they go back to that 70% where FSA is in control

The more we talk, the more you expose yourself, and you just don't wanna admit it....

I have nothing to hide you have full right o expose me...

UN is also a tool of major world powers both the side use and abuse it for there benefit, so did Al-Assad, UN did not born in 2011 or 2012 Al-Assad would have conducted the UN monitored elections at the begging of the demonstrations but like other dictators he bought time and asked for constitutional reform then electoral reforms etc etc etc.....


He won the previous presidential mandate with 97% of popular vote so he did not want to loose that

Saddam and Qaddafi was dismissed with direct intervention by superior Military powers, Qaddafi took more time because they abstained from ground invasion.

So Saddam & Qaddafi did not fall because of popular uprising neither Al-Assad will fall with the popular uprising.

The life of opposition under the dictators have always been on threat they only like and love people like you..

I think 70% is bit exaggeration, still if they hold significant land mark that do not immune them the massive air strikes by Al-Assad's force. So 70% or more or less is not of much significance without air control.

 

[Syrian Lion]

I have nothing to hide you have full right o expose me...

UN is also a tool of major world powers both the side use and abuse it for there benefit, so did Al-Assad, UN did not born in 2011 or 2012 Al-Assad would have conducted the UN monitored elections at the begging of the demonstrations but like other dictators he bought time and asked for constitutional reform then electoral reforms etc etc etc.....


He won the previous presidential mandate with 97% of popular vote so he did not want to loose that

Saddam and Qaddafi was dismissed with direct intervention by superior Military powers, Qaddafi took more time because they abstained from ground invasion.

So Saddam & Qaddafi did not fall because of popular uprising neither Al-Assad will fall with the popular uprising.

The life of opposition under the dictators have always been on threat they only like and love people like you..

I think 70% is bit exaggeration, still if they hold significant land mark that do not immune them the massive air strikes by Al-Assad's force. So 70% or more or less is not of much significance without air control.

You must be out of your mind... or you are just one ignorant person??

About Saddam, you said Saddam didn't fall because of a popular uprising? are you kidding me? then why did the Iraqi army fall apart in less then a month?? and why did the USA call the invasion Operation Iraqi Liberation? wasn't because of Iraqis asked for intervention??
And Gaddafi lost A WHOLE CITY AND THE WHOLE ARMY in Benghazi and you still say it wasn't popular uprising?

And Mubarak fell because most Egyptians rose up againsr Mubarak.... same with Yemen and etc...

Hahaha okay like you said then if Alasad doesn't want to lost the 97% of popular vote, then why does the west refuse to have elections in Syria under the UN eyes??

BTW this is like the fifth time i ask you and till now you didn't answer me...

Why is Alasad still in power?? If the majority of Syrian people wanted Alasad gone, wouldn't Alasad would be gone already? Trust me Syrians fear nothing but GOD, thus the power and the will people can't be stopped no matter what weapon you use or what you do... because nothing can stop the anger of the people.. so how come Alasad still in power?

And I add, the Syrian army is the Syrian people.. so why does still Syria have an Army?
And I know you gonna bring the sect ruling... but the soldiers out numbers the commanders and they can easily turn their weapons on their leaders...

 

[explorer9]

You must be out of your mind... or you are just one ignorant person??

About Saddam, you said Saddam didn't fall because of a popular uprising? are you kidding me? then why did the Iraqi army fall apart in less then a month?? and why did the USA call the invasion Operation Iraqi Liberation? wasn't because of Iraqis asked for intervention??
And Gaddafi lost A WHOLE CITY AND THE WHOLE ARMY in Benghazi and you still say it wasn't popular uprising?

And Mubarak fell because most Egyptians rose up againsr Mubarak.... same with Yemen and etc...

Hahaha okay like you said then if Alasad doesn't want to lost the 97% of popular vote, then why does the west refuse to have elections in Syria under the UN eyes??

BTW this is like the fifth time i ask you and till now you didn't answer me...

Why is Alasad still in power?? If the majority of Syrian people wanted Alasad gone, wouldn't Alasad would be gone already? Trust me Syrians fear nothing but GOD, thus the power and the will people can't be stopped no matter what weapon you use or what you do... because nothing can stop the anger of the people.. so how come Alasad still in power?

And I add, the Syrian army is the Syrian people.. so why does still Syria have an Army?
And I know you gonna bring the sect ruling... but the soldiers out numbers the commanders and they can easily turn their weapons on their leaders...

Assad is still in power because his family, his clan his Nuseyri co religious are the one who is leading the Army.

Assad is still there because he is fighting with defectors and rag-tag militants not with NATO forces.

300 thousand armed forces are the minuscule part of the Syrian population and you know that how many of them defected and who are the defectors.

Fellow Nuseyri are still with Al-Assad and with the minorities and may be some Sunnites too.

As I told you like other hardened dictators Al-Assad does not want to relinquish power and any elections under the aegis of UN are not possible in the present scenario.

When time was right for free and fair elections Al-Assad, like any other dictator used gory tactics .

It took 12 years to Saddam Hussein to fall, with full military Invasion.

It took full 8 months to Qadaffi to after heavy NATO bombing.

Its not as easy for the soldiers to revolt against commanders as you are explaining. Quite a number of them revolted after securing their family from Al-Assad’s wrath.

 

[Syrian Lion]

Assad is still in power because his family, his clan his Nuseyri co religious are the one who is leading the Army.

Assad is still there because he is fighting with defectors and rag-tag militants not with NATO forces.

300 thousand armed forces are the minuscule part of the Syrian population and you know that how many of them defected and who are the defectors.

Fellow Nuseyri are still with Al-Assad and with the minorities and may be some Sunnites too.

As I told you like other hardened dictators Al-Assad does not want to relinquish power and any elections under the aegis of UN are not possible in the present scenario.

When time was right for free and fair elections Al-Assad, like any other dictator used gory tactics .

It took 12 years to Saddam Hussein to fall, with full military Invasion.

It took full 8 months to Qadaffi to after heavy NATO bombing.

Its not as easy for the soldiers to revolt against commanders as you are explaining. Quite a number of them revolted after securing their family from Al-Assad’s wrath.

You must be a comedian??

I have told you, why does this revolution needs nato?? its by the people right? and I told you, that most of the soldiers are sunnies they can easily kill their commanders and turn their guns against the government, so why does Syria still have an army??

look when you wake up from your dream come and tell me... because you still ignoring the simple facts or popular uprising that took Mubarak down, and same in the Yemen, without NATO...

Again i repeat if Syrians didn't want Alasad, don't you think he would be gone long time ago? and wouldn't you think Syrians would have sided with the so called "revolution" and the FSA??

 

[explorer9]

You must be a comedian??

I have told you, why does this revolution needs nato?? its by the people right? and I told you, that most of the soldiers are sunnies they can easily kill their commanders and turn their guns against the government, so why does Syria still have an army??

look when you wake up from your dream come and tell me... because you still ignoring the simple facts or popular uprising that took Mubarak down, and same in the Yemen, without NATO...

Again i repeat if Syrians didn't want Alasad, don't you think he would be gone long time ago? and wouldn't you think Syrians would have sided with the so called "revolution" and the FSA??

You mean to say that Hafez Al-Assad and Bashar Al-Asad remained in power for long because of the love and affection of Syrian people? I have mentioned my points that why he is still in power but you do not want to accept that and it is entirely your prerogative.

 

[Syrian Lion]

You mean to say that Hafez Al-Assad and Bashar Al-Asad remained in power for long because of the love and affection of Syrian people? I have mentioned my points that why he is still in power but you do not want to accept that and it is entirely your prerogative.

Look I assure if this so called "revolution" stayed peaceful like the Bahrain revolution, Alasad would have been gone long time ago..

Syrians know what's best for them now, Syrians don't want to become slaves for the west, Syrians are fighting for their sovereignty, and Syrians are fighting world wide terrorism...

I don't care about Alasad, all I care now is about Syria, and the sovereignty of Syria, and the best leader for this crisis is Bashar Alasad. I would prefer him over any outside opposition, because Alasad kept Syria united and independent, while those who call themselves opposition want to sell Syria to the west, and make Syria a puppet states like the most of the states in the M.E. Syrians know this game very well, it's not about democracy or freedom, because we had better things than those fake things, we had safety, love and peace...

Now you keep ignoring the fact that there is no popular uprising in Syria, unlike Egypt and Yemen, where the population all rose up WITHOUT ANY WEAPONS and defeated the government, but in Syria there is armed "opposition" that is only supported by foreign countries and not by the Syrian people.... you just don't want to believe the reality. You want the west to win, but remember this is Syria, and Syrians will fight for their sovereignty and dignity with or without Alasad... Syrians will never accept a western puppet as a leader....

You just don't want to open your eyes, because you're having a very sweet dream, well someday you'll have to wake up and see the bitter reality ( bitter for you, I guess)..

Peace out...

 

[explorer9]

I wish Sovereignty , dignity , unity love, happiness , peace and all other goodies for Syria and Syrian people. I would be more happy if Jordan, Lebanon , Palestine and Israel will be merged in present day Syria and will form the old and real Syria, of before the pyskes-picot accord.

let me clarify you why the Egyptian revolution remained relatively peaceful? because Tantavi, Annan and other SCAF were not the relative of Mobarak and there armed forces refused to kill the citizens even many officers took part in demos. Same was happened in Tunisian.

In Yemen the revolution was relatively more bloody where Saleh's family was holding the military positions and they refused and killed the people and allowed Saleh to hold the power little more longer. Finaly he was replaced by his VP with Saudi intervention and guarantees.

In the case of Syria since after the uprising the ground situation became more sectarian because Al- Asad is from minority Nuseyri sect. It is virtually impossible for a person from small minority to win in presenditial election since the seed of sectarianism is seeded by other Sunnite states.( You can take a cue from Iraq after Saddam the Sunni backed block is also led By Iyad Allawi, a Shiet)

It is purely Shiet- Sunnite hegemony game that is being played by regional powers and the Sunnite powers want compensate the loss of Iraq with Syria.

I hold Al-Assad responsible for not allowing political opposition to nurture in the country, when people have no voice they resort to arms struggle.

 

[Syrian Lion]

I wish Sovereignty , dignity , unity love, happiness , peace and all other goodies for Syria and Syrian people. I would be more happy if Jordan, Lebanon , Palestine and Israel will be merged in present day Syria and will form the old and real Syria, of before the pyskes-picot accord.

let me clarify you why the Egyptian revolution remained relatively peaceful? because Tantavi, Annan and other SCAF were not the relative of Mobarak and there armed forces refused to kill the citizens even many officers took part in demos. Same was happened in Tunisian.

In Yemen the revolution was relatively more bloody where Saleh's family was holding the military positions and they refused and killed the people and allowed Saleh to hold the power little more longer. Finaly he was replaced by his VP with Saudi intervention and guarantees.

In the case of Syria since after the uprising the ground situation became more sectarian because Al- Asad is from minority Nuseyri sect. It is virtually impossible for a person from small minority to win in presenditial election since the seed of sectarianism is seeded by other Sunnite states.( You can take a cue from Iraq after Saddam the Sunni backed block is also led By Iyad Allawi, a Shiet)

It is purely Shiet- Sunnite hegemony game that is being played by regional powers and the Sunnite powers want compensate the loss of Iraq with Syria.

I hold Al-Assad responsible for not allowing political opposition to nurture in the country, when people have no voice they resort to arms struggle.

Then why does the west and opposition refuse Alasad to be in the elections?? If he is going to lost, because he has no popularity, then there is nothing to worry about...

And you said it.. regarding Egypt the army was with the people, thus it was a popular uprising.... and in Syria the army is with the people, because the army is THE SYRIAN PEOPLE... do you think the soldier would kill him own people, his brothers and sisters?? don't you think the army would all turned against the government??

And if you really wish Syria peace and such, then you should not support terrorism, you should support peace, and the only way to get rid of Alasad is with peace, and fair clean elections under the UN eyes, like Alasad proposed many times...