Deactivated
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2018
- Messages
- 725
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
our US friends at it again... don't know what to say... any sources regarding these rumors?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This move only logical if G-40 real range is more than 40+ . Just because using a 65 km ranged gökdoğan active radar seeker to 40 km ranged g-40 is waste of money. On the other hand r&d hisar-rf is waste of money when sage work on g-40.
So it could be ; Hisar-O Rf (30-35 km range + 15 km alttitude) + G-40 (65-70 km range + 20 km alttitude) + Siper Block-1 (120 km range + 30 km alttitude).
So in land Hisar-O Rf + Siper will be good tandem. G-40 cant be used in land based. Just because if we targeted to shot a aircraft who want a use lgk-hgk kind lazer guided ammos they must be decrease a altt to 15 km and they must be close the target 30 km range. Just because that kind of weapons have a range around 20-30 km .
But if a target airplane decide to attack target with 100-120 km ranged wing guided kgk, sdb, spear kind weapon we must use siper at all. Neither hisar-o rf nor g-40 effective againts him.
But anyone can say we can engage lgk-hgk kind weapon loaded fighters without hims attack range with land based g-40 . Yes but we can do it same with Siper also. In the bassis Only diffrences of g-40 and siper is rocket booster (not launch booster - cruise booster like mk72) and maybe rf datalink. Cost of booster and rf datalink is lower than establish another land based g-40 systems cost.
-------
But G-40 is important for navy. Because there are spesific weapons who have ranged more than 30-35 km ; Penguin ( 55 km), am39 exocet (70 km) etc. He can engage long range missiled helicopters and naval aircrafts with this ability. And for long range with siper missile also.
yes but armies started to go with airplanes like poseidon and atr72, those missiles will not be able to hit that high yet i think, but shooting down helikopters means a lot too, you will make ships blind against SUbmarines...time to put the hisar-o on a submarine to be fired out of the torpedo tunes to deal with enemy MPA or ASW helicopters; targeting data provided by a submarine launched drone relaying data to a bout floating on a fiber optical wire from the submarine. It will revolutionize submarine operations
View attachment 657560
Two aircrafts will be modified for Multi-Int concept designed by Aselsan
Aselsan ESM/ELINT/COMINT/IMINT sensors will be added to aircraft.
View attachment 657533
Does anyone know what this system is what it is designed for? I couldn't find anything about it but judging from its color and sensors, it's some kind of navy/coastal ECM vehicle.
Looks like the Koral system, whats the difference here? Is it just a smaller copy of koral or do this have other capabilities?
Although similar technologies are used in both systems, there are differences between the REDET-II and KORAL Systems in terms of output powers and detecting/jamming ranges. Since KORAL needs to detect and jam hostile radars over longer distances, it is a bigger system than the REDET-II system. While REDET-II is designed to be deployed and operated close (probably up to 100km) to an area of operations (AO), the KORAL Mobile Radar EW System can be used against hostile radars from a few hundred kilometers away.