-SINAN-
BANNED
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2013
- Messages
- 16,746
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Hi bro.Had to login after several months just to give a 'thanks' for this glorious butchering. Well done bro.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hi bro.Had to login after several months just to give a 'thanks' for this glorious butchering. Well done bro.
We just follow in the footsteps of the rest of the West and really the rest of the world that has a tap on journalism and media. Give the media free roam in any country that's open to foreign manipulation and input, and that media will become the toy of Western corporate media. Deal with this reality, or set some standards.Have to say that Sabah's articles reeks of "fanatism" I think, I can't really tell if the writers are jounalists or zealots. Perhaps I'm just not very good at reading, or they're not very good at writing in english. And correct me if I'm wrong but when I read Sabah's articles it's like they've already joined the bandwagon of RTE.
Free objective press doesn't exist ?
Cut off every economic deal with you and watch Turks eating dust and xxxx
Turkish media sucks as channels and newspapers are based on ideologies, unfortunately. Sabah is definitely pro-govt, so no surprise there. Best to read some pro-govt and anti-govt newspapers for a balance. I personally find Haberturk's news presentation to be well balanced.Have to say that Sabah's articles reeks of "fanatism" I think, I can't really tell if the writers are jounalists or zealots. Perhaps I'm just not very good at reading, or they're not very good at writing in english. And correct me if I'm wrong but when I read Sabah's articles it's like they've already joined the bandwagon of RTE.
Free objective press doesn't exist ?
Turkish media sucks as channels and newspapers are based on ideologies, unfortunately. Sabah is definitely pro-govt, so no surprise there. Best to read some pro-govt and anti-govt newspapers for a balance. I personally find Haberturk's news presentation to be well balanced.
I just roll with dailysabah and hurriyetdailynews for English news on Turkey. Zaman is Gulen's media and writes only whatever suits their sect and interest. They used to write pro-govt and wonderful articles on Turkey, but when the Akp-Gulen war started some years ago suddenly Akp and Turkey became a shithole according to their media. I don't think taking them serious is a good idea, whether you're leftist or rightist.I don't think they release news in english. And I'd prefer reading it in english and share in defence.pk and get some healthy discussions. after government took over zaman, they stopped their english articles. such a shame.
Now that was a newspaper against RTE and AKP so we'd get different views and stuff. As far as I know if they post lies that they can't prove, they get fined from RTÜK.
Erdogan has warned other foreign countries like Kirgizstan and India about the dangers of the Gulenist network, but he hasn't said a word about the Gulenist network in America, which he knows exist and was mostly established on his watch. Apparently Erdogan wants to keep it intact. Is that why he's trying to extradite Gulen without providing the evidence required in the Turkey-America extradition treaty? Why, if Gulen is so dangerous, doesn't Erdogan want its American branch to be dismantled as quickly as possible? Doesn't Erdogan know that the Gulenists here have started to show their defiance by supporting Gulen openly and publicly? How long before their fingers reach out, back into Turkey itself? Or is the truth that the Gulenists are no threat to the state at all - not even Turkey?...FETÖ and Erdogan worked a long time together. Gülenists didn’t just emerge from nowhere. Only during Erdogan’s rule they made it into key positions. During other parties rule, they didn’t make it that far in the state...
Erdogan has warned other foreign countries like Kirgizstan and India about the dangers of the Gulenist network, but he hasn't said a word about the Gulenist network in America, which he knows exist and was mostly established on his watch. Apparently Erdogan wants to keep it intact. Is that why he's trying to extradite Gulen without providing the evidence required in the Turkey-America extradition treaty? Why, if Gulen is so dangerous, doesn't Erdogan want its American branch to be dismantled as quickly as possible? Doesn't Erdogan know that the Gulenists here have started to show their defiance by supporting Gulen openly and publicly? How long before their fingers reach out, back into Turkey itself? Or is the truth that the Gulenists are no threat to the state at all - not even Turkey?
Enes Kanter, American basketball player, was disowned by his father in a newspaper letter
because gülen is cia backed terrorist groub and terrorist recuiting system and a control system also something to infiultrate states.. all in favor for US..
we are asking the master to give his slave to us..
if we offend the master he wont give us his slave.. so this must be done with manners because we want him and the master will loose somthing good but in exchance we must let the master know you will lose a slave but not lose a strategic partner.. maybe we can convince the master that we are more important than his slave..
There were some events that led to confrontation, such as (from the top of my head);A question I want to ask some days ago. What has happend that it came to a brick between Erdogan and Gulen?