Does our NAVY have this too?Delta Marine is building 8500 DWT capable floating dry-dock for Saudi Arabian Navy. 175m long and 37.5m wide it is really huge naval structre. It can be used to build, repair and overhaul of vessel up to 135m long, 19m wide. It will boost Saudi Naval Capabilies.
Delta Marine is building 8500 DWT capable floating dry-dock for Saudi Arabian Navy. 175m long and 37.5m wide it is really huge naval structre. It can be used to build, repair and overhaul of vessel up to 135m long, 19m wide. It will boost Saudi Naval Capabilies.
. Beside navy,we have a lot of drydocks /both floating and stone built, in commercial shipyards.It doesnt seem a place for major equipment , maybe they ll just put some minor equipment like receivers ,or some other things like for communication and etc. The area is just seems big because they need to put radar near to middle,and upper structure extended to front a little bit.
8 ( 4 ,and +4 upgraded as TF100) ada class is planned, seems like first 4 ships will be nearly same design with minor changes. Steel cut for 3rd and so far i heard 4th have done, its planned to use indigeneous propulsion control system for 4th as testbed,and apply it in 5th and 6th.
For TF2000 , preliminary and concept design shaped ,4 is planned (or officially 2). Some preliminary engineering calculations and integrated systems are still in consideration.
For TF100 ,it will be seen after 3-4th ada class is launched next year ,they ll begin to talk about this,and held tenders.
For LST , steel cut has done a while ago ,but ADİK has not uploaded recent pictures of building . Maybe its not in erection progress right now , usually they uploaded medias during built of LCT.
For LPD, navantia began to work on design ,for applying changes while SEDEF prepares the background.
We have lots of it, even no need to post in here
It doesnt seem a place for major equipment , maybe they ll just put some minor equipment like receivers ,or some other things like for communication and etc. The area is just seems big because they need to put radar near to middle,and upper structure extended to front a little bit.
It would be good if they use one more 127 mm on front in the next versions of ship, i ll like it .
From what I remember it will have, or atleast thats what our experts here were talking about.
Its main role is AAW but beside it, there will be also ASW/ASUW too , just a FFG actually.
@cabatli_53 mentioned it many times that TF-2000 would basically be a Destroyer but we are Using NATO terms, thats why we dont call it Destroyer.
Unveiled design of TF2000 shows that even fitting 32 cells caused some problems , its size is relatively small, deck area gets smaller too. To fit 48 -64 cells they will have to remove something,or increase the size for not i dont think they will change project to be a larger, but maybe for additional 2 ships they will go for size increment.
