Subramanian
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2010
- Messages
- 1,080
- Reaction score
- 0
all those guys u said have barring the bosniaks have mongol blood,not turkic blood.By Turk here we mean the Anatolian Turk,the present day Turkey.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
dude,me being a south indian has nothing to do with knowledge.We speak to each other in English,a language from a small island in northern europe.And dont throw aryan dravidian jargon jargon at me,baloch boy.
Anyway coming to topic,there is this thing called Pan-Turkism, where all the turkic language people together.It is a linguistic union and not an ethnic one.Basically it is true that lot of people mentioned here have central asian blood,but central asia extends from Mongolia to Turkey right across all the ex soviet republics.
I mean obviously all those people could share some blood but not so much blood,the idea here is when we say Turkey today we mean the Anatolian Turks who are more similar to Europeans like Greeks and Slav people rather than some guy in Peshawar/Balochistan.
And it has been proven that Mongols moved from East to West and they put their DNA all around where they went and it is common sense something which the above poster obviously lacks,that more their DNA ll be closer to Mongolia rather than some far off Krygystan.
The Hazaras may have more of Mongol blood and look more with east asian features.Look at the two pics below and say these guys have no mongol blood,their eyes make it obvious.
first is a punjabi muslim and someone whose family migrated from afghanistan to jalandhar and second is a punjabi pashtun from mainwali.
Do the math,sweetheart.
Hahahaha,sure.
I am done.
dude,me being a south indian has nothing to do with knowledge.We speak to each other in English,a language from a small island in northern europe.And dont throw aryan dravidian jargon jargon at me,baloch boy.
Anyway coming to topic,there is this thing called Pan-Turkism, where all the turkic language people together.It is a linguistic union and not an ethnic one.Basically it is true that lot of people mentioned here have central asian blood,but central asia extends from Mongolia to Turkey right across all the ex soviet republics.
I mean obviously all those people could share some blood but not so much blood,the idea here is when we say Turkey today we mean the Anatolian Turks who are more similar to Europeans like Greeks and Slav people rather than some guy in Peshawar/Balochistan.
And it has been proven that Mongols moved from East to West and they put their DNA all around where they went and it is common sense something which the above poster obviously lacks,that more their DNA ll be closer to Mongolia rather than some far off Krygystan.
The Hazaras may have more of Mongol blood and look more with east asian features.Look at the two pics below and say these guys have no mongol blood,their eyes make it obvious.
first is a punjabi muslim and someone whose family migrated from afghanistan to jalandhar and second is a punjabi pashtun from mainwali.
Do the math,sweetheart.
you clearly have no clue about Pakistan's ethnic groups, its culture, and their origins. Last thing indians (and that too South indians) need to do is teach us Pakistanis the history of our own people.
Facts,what Facts.
It is as obvious as daylight man,it is only you who cant see it.Actually i have got a DNA analysis done and i have 40% R1A1 but obviously i dont care much about all that.
Those eyes are a strong example of mongol blood,nobody else has it.I can tell you,We Indians have no issues.We know we are mixed blood and we are cool.
It is you guys who build a national conciousness based on lies and try to deny the reality everytime u have to justify it.
What i showed is a fact of fact of fact,the factest fact around.
And get the DNA haplo group test done,u ll be amazed at where all u might have cousins.
---------- Post added at 03:53 AM ---------- Previous post was at 03:52 AM ----------
I have enough pakistani friends who pretty much agree with am saying here,i dont care about what u feel.
FACTS????? You want FACTS???? I'l give you FACTS, just watch. And BTW, why does every indian boast that they have R1A1 lolz, an obvious indication of inferiority complex.
---------- Post added at 03:25 AM ---------- Previous post was at 03:25 AM ----------
lol, yeah ok.
No,u asked me right where i am from,what is the colour of my skin and all that?
I just told u this to tell u that all that doesn't matter.
U r going to give me facts now,i m keen to watch pal,perhaps i dont know whether they mean something else in Balochistan.
And why do u talk about an inferiority complex,i mean u guys are so phucked in the head,u keep looking for brownie points in every discussion.
dude,i dont care about my haplo groups.I would have been proud even if i had no R1A1,it is irrelevant.
I said that to prove to him,that me being from somewhere is not important for this dicussion.
And i was not insulting anything there,complex again?
And finally on topic,
Turkey is a little country with a little GDP
they hardly have any clout to point a finger at India or to bother us.Nor are they in the vicinity of Kashmir to make an informed opinion,it is just timepass.I mean they are not even Brazil/Russia,who cares about them?
And dont throw aryan dravidian jargon jargon at me,baloch boy.
So if a black person speaks turkish then he is considered a Turk? And if a Mexican speaks Turkish then he is considered a Turk? Or if a white, blue eyed, blond haired German speaks Turkish then according to you he is more Turkish then the person who is a Turk by blood? Wow, what a strange logic lolz.Anyway coming to topic,there is this thing called Pan-Turkism, where all the turkic language people together.It is a linguistic union and not an ethnic one.
Basically it is true that lot of people mentioned here have central asian blood,but central asia extends from Mongolia to Turkey right across all the ex soviet republics.
I mean obviously all those people could share some blood but not so much blood,the idea here is when we say Turkey today we mean the Anatolian Turks who are more similar to Europeans like Greeks and Slav people rather than some guy in Peshawar/Balochistan.
And it has been proven that Mongols moved from East to West and they put their DNA all around where they went and it is common sense something which the above poster obviously lacks,that more their DNA ll be closer to Mongolia rather than some far off Krygystan.
The Hazaras may have more of Mongol blood and look more with east asian features.Look at the two pics below and say these guys have no mongol blood,their eyes make it obvious.
http://hindilyrics.net/profiles/pics/nusrat-fateh-ali-khan.jpg
http://pakteahouse.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/imran-khan-33-AFP-640x480.jpg
Cool.
Just report what u feel offensive....instead of abusing.
Turkey is a trillion dollar economy with a population of around 80 million people.. aint tht enough?
This thread is not abt IOK.. so why even bring the topic here?
Funny how your saying while your the one who brought the R1A1 crap into this thread (serious inferiority complex)
So if a black person speaks turkish then he is considered a Turk? And if a Mexican speaks Turkish then he is considered a Turk? Or if a white, blue eyed, blond haired German speaks Turkish then according to you he is more Turkish then the person who is a Turk by blood? Wow, what a strange logic lolz.
Nobody here disputed that fact so totally unnecessary for you to bring that up.
Of course, since the modern day Turkey is a mix of Turks, Native Anatolians, and other races. No one is disputing this fact either, don't know where your coming up with these statements. However it should be noted that Pakistani culture is heavily influenced by Turkish and Persian culture, basically a hybrid of the two, due to the fact that Turks, Afghans and Persians have repeatedly invaded and settled in the land we call Pakistan today. Kebabs, Biryani, Na'an bread, Samosa, Chicken Tikka all of these have their origins in central asia and persia (funny how indians claim these dishes as their own).
Turks are a Mongoloid race genius. And may i ask you how do you know about their DNA? Did you check it or you somehow magically know their DNA and gene origins.
Little do you know but the Hazaras aren't the only Mongoloid people in Pakistan, go to Northern Pakistan and you will find Turkic Uyghur tribes, they have their own native language and have not intermixed with other races due to their isolated nature. The same applies to the Kalash and other people.
Pakistan is a country of diverse peoples of different backgrounds, and our culture has its roots in central asia, we have more in common with our western neighbors than bharat.
And since you brought all of this R1A1 mumbo jumbo
BTW, here is a Pakistani boy:
And here is another one:
^^have nothing in common with you bharatis.