There were reported casualties prior to Israel boarding the flotilla.
All phony. Anyone can tell the narrative propagated by Erdo makes no sense: if the Israelis were shooting from the air they should have kept shooting or at least boarded holding live ammo as long as there was opposition on deck - or else Israel's finest are so incompetent Arabs would have defeated the Jews by beating them with wet noodles decades ago. No, the Israelis boarded holding paintball guns because - despite the threats uttered from the ship via radio - they had been led to believe it was another ordinary board & inspect job and they could expect the usual cooperative reception that's supposed to take place under international law.
This is the edited footage of them boarding the ship, no footage of anything prior to that. So if Israel didn't shoot at the activist prior to that then what do they have to hide? Show us the full footage.
The video appears to be quite definitive. I don't see what difference a few more seconds would make: you could always claim, "Well, the Israelis started shooting before this..."
No, you made a claim that almost all accusations made against Israel have no truth to them. I asked to provide a few examples since they're so many according to you. And you haven't.
"A few examples" of "almost all" doesn't jibe; that's linguistic tyranny, for you could always demand more. And I don't think I need to supply any. You know enough for your own account and if you want more, you can visit the Zionist websites yourself.
It means you've made another baseless allegation.
No, I didn't make the claim, the Muslims in the thread did.
Nope, international law is the modern day law.
I presume by rejecting the laws on the books and invoking the phrase, "modern day law" you're returning again to your argument that "international law is what the majority says it is". That idea may indeed appeal to bigoted majoritarian societies, yet that is not what international law is.
Hard as it is to accept, the Jews of Israel did nothing wrong by returning to their ancient homeland, purchasing land from Arabs or settling in public lands. The Mandate - endorsed by both the West and Turkey - didn't just allow this but explicitly encouraged Jews to do so. Instead, the Arabs who tried to murder and expel the Jews were and are in violation of both international law and their referenced obligations under Ottoman practice: by violence, rebellion, revolt, and fleeing to the camps of enemy armies, they surrendered their civil and property rights. The Jews of Israel owe Arabs like yourself
absolutely nothing and neither you nor your grandparents have any moral or legal claim upon them. What you've received for the past century is charity - not something you're owed, but given to you out of pity by the West and Israel, and in the hope of fostering a lasting irritant and enemy by surrounding tyrants.
(The reason why I wrote "century" instead of "seventy years" is that the idea Jews owed displaced Arabs something seems to have originated in the pre-WWI aliyah days: when Jews bought lands from absentee landlords, they sometimes tried to help the Arab tenant farmers they kicked out by buying them farmland elsewhere, outside of Palestine. That's why the Jews land-purchasing outfits bought realty in Syria. They were under no obligation to do so for under Ottoman law and practice tenant farmers could be kicked out after they harvested their crop; but in the Arabs' mind it was twisted into something wicked.)
If you want to escape being the object of other's agendas, you're going to have to adopt a different course. You're going to have to stand with the Jews and promote their values. For conquering and killing the Jews won't let you escape from under the thumbs of tyranny, that just enables it further.
Along with the retarded Israeli decision maker who thought it would be a good idea to land soldiers one by one at the middle of a ship full of Islamists -
I suspect - though I don't have proof - that it was Erdogan himself who assured the Israelis all would be O.K. The Israelis were set up by him as part of his plan to invoke blind patriotism to suppress Turks' freedoms. Certainly his response was consistent with this hypothesis. Like I said, I've no proof, though I wonder that Turks don't themselves call for an investigation to see whether or not Erdogan plotted the slaying of his own countrymen for political gain.