El Sidd
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2017
- Messages
- 67,597
- Reaction score
- 2
- Country
- Location
Not sure if he had to bite his tongue, none the less the acknowledgement is there.
This will sell good in that island far far away.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not sure if he had to bite his tongue, none the less the acknowledgement is there.
Not sure if he had to bite his tongue, none the less the acknowledgement is there.
Pak always saves a couple of cards inside the sleeves!!!!!More F-16s and more US dollars?
It's not just this couple but the "key" parameters, integrals and derivatives of "paramount" variables in the US's calculus (principal cost function for optimization with severe boundary conditions) regarding security, global dominance etc. remain also tangled in the Pak captivity.....Key phrase, with many implications.
I also have reservations, why a rescue was not attempted in Afghanistan if they had such a precise info.... why they were allowed to cross over into Pakistani territory by US forces???
I was thinking the same thing. Why wasn't there a rescue attempt by US forces in Afghanistan when they had complete intel about them. They should/could have rescued them in afghanistan where they have their forces and everything. Why let them cross over to pakistan in the first place to be rescued and trust PA when you're selling the world this narrative that we don't act against haqqanis? Something doesn't add up. What if the operation by PA was unsuccessful. Blame it on PA then?
'We told them and they let the haqqani network with the hostages slide through their check posts'? hence DO MORE.