What's new

Tibetans in India..... did china forgot them?

You know what I meant?

What makes you think Chinese are in Tibet illegally. Tibet has historically been part of China.

Again how is it any less legal than Kashmir being part of India?

Its different... Tibet was,is and will remain part of china,.... while same cannot be said abt kashmir....
 
How is that any different from Kashmir?

it is because kashmiries itself were divided what they want....

In kashmir neighbour is playing a major role secretly.... while in tibet neighbour is not involved in any case....

kashmiries are used as terrorists while weapon of knowledge and studies are provided to tibetans in exile


there is no comparison in tibet and kashmir
 
Its different... Tibet was,is and will remain part of china,.... while same cannot be said abt kashmir....

India dont interfere in tibet like our neighbours interfere in ours

kashmir will remain Indian integral part.... now stick to topic....

if you dont have anything to say about tibet then dont troll here
 
Its different... Tibet was,is and will remain part of china,.... while same cannot be said abt kashmir....

Where Kashmir stands at the moment is the reality. It is part of India and will remain so, unless our government thinks otherwise. You cannot force India to give up Kashmir, neither diplomatically nor militarily.

You have tried many times but failed.

Lets stick to the topic.
 
Its different... Tibet was,is and will remain part of china,.... while same cannot be said abt kashmir....

OFF TOPIC :-

Remember my words dude...and let me assure you that kashmir is and kashmir will remain an integral part of india no matter what internet warriors or ourneighbour say..;)

ON TOPIC :-

I think this thread is flame,,what is need to starting this thread when our own Gov accepts tibet as part of china..!

LONG LIVE "BRIC" POWER...specially sino-indian frndship...!
 
You know what I meant?

What makes you think Chinese are in Tibet illegally. Tibet has historically been part of China.

Again how is it any less legal than Kashmir being part of India?

a. No - it has not historically been part of China.

b. Difference between a Treaty of Accession and the 17-point Agreement
 
They were born in India, so they are Indian not Chinese
hope everything going well with them in India,thanks.
 
LOL its funny tht just after 1 post a bunch of indian start ranting on it.....

Kashmir wont remain part of india.... good luck.
 
They were born in India, so they are Indian not Chinese
hope everything going well with them in India,thanks.

LOL. The Dalai Lama was born in Tibet as were a lot of the refugees.
 
LOL its funny tht just after 1 post a bunch of indian start ranting on it.....

Kashmir wont remain part of india.... good luck.

well we don't need good luck, cause we are holding and governing it,,say this good luck to those who want it from us...

and about"kashmir won't remain part of india" hmmm you are right we are watching it from past 60 years with us and we will watch it as same in future..

we watched it ,we are watching it and we will see...;)


on topic :-

Tibet is internal matter and part of china let them do whatever they wana do there why few members pooking there nose in it???
 
are indians trying to repeat east-pakistan 1971>???

China is no Pak and Tibet is not east-Pakistan!
 
LoL, we welcome Dalai lama come back to China, dare he ?:rofl:

Which once again proves China's credentials as a an authoritarian regime if a citizen can't return to it if he wants.
 
a. No - it has not historically been part of China.

b. Difference between a Treaty of Accession and the 17-point Agreement

Like the country east of the indus was know as India, the country north of himalayas was China.
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom