Three Indian blunders in the 1971 war

[Basel]

On the other hand, why doesn't Pakistan give up Kashmir. That will also 'nearly end all issues in Sub-continent'.
As far as Muslim majority goes - that is irrelevant, India is a secular country (for real).
And even if the Kashmir issue is resolved, we still need a big military for your all-weather friend.

Pakistan can not give up Kashmir there are several reasons for that and one of them is that it is strategically very important for Pakistan as all of our water also came from Kashmir.

There was a formula on which India was partitioned and Kashmir is unresolved issue of that, India did not follow that formula and it created mess.

Not happening bro!
Kashmir is of strategic importance to us, from the resources to the rivers and its position in Asia everything favors India. Giving away kashmir would put Indian capital near the border and also would be opening up punjab to more terrorism. It would then have dominoes effect on India.

Then be ready for MAD which was predicted by World bank years ago.

 

[Sheikh Rauf]

Do Indians have to post this every year?

offcourse they wanna know their achievment when ever Pakistan beat them in their home

 

[The Great One]

Pakistan can not give up Kashmir there are several reasons for that and one of them is that it is strategically very important for Pakistan as all of our water also came from Kashmir.

So?
Has there ever been a single violation of IWT on India's part despite Pakistan doing...................all the things it has been doing to us...........1965/1971/Kargil/Siachen/Kashmir insurgency/26/11/Parliament attacks etc. Plus, if resolving Kashmir will nearly end all problems in SA then whats the problem.

 

[Basel]

So?
Has there ever been a single violation of IWT on India's part despite Pakistan doing...................all the things it has been doing to us...........Kargil/Siachen/Kashmir insurgency/26/11/Parliament attacks etc. Plus, if resolving Kashmir will nearly end all problems in SA then whats the problem.

Indian water aggression is more dangerous for Pakistan then its military one. IWT is violated by India since long now, and India militarized Siachen which PA never cared about before its capture.

 

[Levina]

Then be ready for MAD which was predicted by World bank years ago.

why doesnt Pakistan give up Kashmir issue???
Pakistan is not even ready to accept LOC as IB which India has proposed and instead Pak wants "complete" kashmir. How should we conclude that ?

 

[Sheikh Rauf]

On the other hand, why doesn't Pakistan give up Kashmir. That will also 'nearly end all issues in Sub-continent'.
As far as Muslim majority goes - that is irrelevant, India is a secular country (for real).
And even if the Kashmir issue is resolved, we still need a big military for your all-weather friend.

So?
Has there ever been a single violation of IWT on India's part despite Pakistan doing...................all the things it has been doing to us...........1965/1971/Kargil/Siachen/Kashmir insurgency/26/11/Parliament attacks etc. Plus, if resolving Kashmir will nearly end all problems in SA then whats the problem.

Really stop crying.. india started involving in matter of Kashmir.. its wasnt yours to take.. you will owe Kashmiri a resolution since you occupied it..
second you put your nose in Paskistan's internal matter in 1971..
third support anyone one agains Paskitan like shumali itihad..
Manmohan singh even accepted in sharmul sheikh that india is involve in terrorism in balouchistan..
stop crying like your media ..
Pakistan never answer you like how you have been (Dehati Aurtain)..
seriously why really on duty General have to say stuff like tv Anchor like we will do this and that.. if indian General really have to do somthing feed your 600 million poor before you take on PAKISTAN.
or try.. this time it will one final time you will ever think to hurt PAKISTAN.

why doesnt Pakistan give up Kashmir issue???
Pakistan is not even ready to accept LOC as IB which India has proposed and instead Pak wants "complete" kashmir. How should we conclude that ?

your own PM went to UN .. so follow what you wanted.. or deal with what you have been cuz without solving Kashmir issue india will not gain anything and we make sure that..
there are resolutions in UN let Kashmiri decide... its just a basic thing they deserve..
adios

 

[The Great One]

Indian water aggression is more dangerous for Pakistan them its military one. IWT is violated by India since long now, and India militarized Siachen which PA never cared about before its capture.

Can you support these statements with any proof.

 

[Sheikh Rauf]

what would happen if there are proof.. buddy Indians live in denial..Kashmir is hurting india more than Pakistan..
and we make sure that

 

[Sheikh Rauf]

what would happen if there are proof.. buddy Indians live in denial..Kashmir is hurting india more than Pakistan..

yes of course because after that pakistan wont exist. it will be merged in india along kashmir. and all pakistani will be sent to arab countries as they claim they are arabs.

Ramesh Kaka .. there is Pakistan every where even in India every neighbour every street ..
india only born after Pakistan so if somthing happen to Pak we make sure india will fly in dust too..

 

[The Great One]

what would happen if there are proof..

For starters, the rest of the world will start taking you seriously. You have lost all appeals of India violating IWT. Pakistanis accusing India of water-terrorism or any terrorism (Baluchistan/TTP) is considered a joke everywhere except for Pakistan.

buddy Indians live in denial..Kashmir is hurting india more than Pakistan..
and we make sure that

Why? Mard-e-momin don't have balls to send real military that you have to rely on proxies and 'non-state actors'.

 

[Razia Sultana]

The surprising thing is that India help Mujeeb to create Bangladesh but if you see equipment of their military its majority of Chinese why? they don't trust India their so called big bro?

because chinese equipments come a dime a dozen.

 

[Mike_Brando]

Really stop crying.. india started involving in matter of Kashmir.. its wasnt yours to take.. you will owe Kashmiri a resolution since you occupied it..
second you put your nose in Paskistan's internal matter in 1971..
third support anyone one agains Paskitan like shumali itihad..
Manmohan singh even accepted in sharmul sheikh that india is involve in terrorism in balouchistan..
stop crying like your media ..
Pakistan never answer you like how you have been (Dehati Aurtain)..
seriously why really on duty General have to say stuff like tv Anchor like we will do this and that.. if indian General really have to do somthing feed your 600 million poor before you take on PAKISTAN.
or try.. this time it will one final time you will ever think to hurt PAKISTAN.


your own PM went to UN .. so follow what you wanted.. or deal with what you have been cuz without solving Kashmir issue india will not gain anything and we make sure that..
there are resolutions in UN let Kashmiri decide... its just a basic thing they deserve..
adios

It's ours and we won't give it no matter what happens in the future.There's an old saying in Hindi/Urdu which goes like this "Jo ukharna hain ukhar lo" i.e. do whatever you have to do but India won't give up J&K as it's an integral part of this country,now now not even in the distant future.

 

[jaiind]

 

[Omega007]

Point no 1 ans is that simply there was no genocide it only existed on papers and media and India enjoyed 1:5 ratio in East Pakistan.
No 2 and 3 have same answer
1)There was only one fully equipped Pakistani corps in East Pakistan rest of then which got there in 1971 were only carrying there small arms.
2)Because Military planners never think like public so they better knew that majority of Pakistani forces are still capable of brutal defense and Pakistan is acting as one of hubs of USA in Asia so attacking west Pakistan will cause US full support not for Pakistan but for it's FOB against soviets which was you named as Pakistan.

Why just capping the ratio at just 1:5??Make it 1:50 or 1:500 if your heart may please to do so.But that won't change the reality.

 

[Guynextdoor2]

Nope...its all because our leadership that has always been patsy that we still have to bear the brunt of their silly mistakes.

Btw why would a user named "kans" who uses arabic be Ukranian?? false flagger?? are you??

BS. If any of the above nonsense things had been done, Bangladesh would not have been declared an independent country. Paksitan had the full support of US & CHina, both of which were ready to go to war. India didn't even have the full support of Russia which kept asking us to settle things through negos. 'Conduct War crime trials' with whose help? 'Make Kashmir an issue' With whose help? 'Ashoka Syndrome' is an idea the author pulled out of his rear. India would have lost the war if it had pressed it's advantage into west Pakistan or Kashmir, for the simple reason that the US and CHina would have both gotten involved. The author is an illiterate moron.