Well i am not against the plebicite- but why for half of j&k? Y not full j&k (ur occupied part included-i cant write the name as its changing automatically).? Still the UN norms are pending there ..where its mentioned before plebicite pak army will have to evecuate j&k land. And then only plebicite will be there..so who is against the plebiciteIf as u say that the majority wants to stay with India then why not hold a plebiscite?
Worst case for Pak - lose Kashmir(goes to India)
Worst case for India - lose Kashmir(goes to Pak)
Result - ppl of Kashmir happy
Overtime no more tension between India, Pak, and most likely China too.
Long term result...closer ties(along the lines of NATO/EU) between India/Pak/China/Russia. That's most of Asia, three major economies, huge population, 4 nuclear powers. Such a powerful alliance would definitely pull in some other countries. Even with just us 4 imagine what we could achieve together. We would have a powerful voice in the world. No amount of sanctions would be effective. No threat big enough to challenge us. All it takes is some compromise on some petty piece of land. Imagine the payout. Borders might become meaningless in that scenario in the long run anyways. All it takes is for us to set aside our ego for a bigger goal.
I doubt any of this would ever happen. It's just my idealistic rants. Most likely the ppl of this subcontinent will keep fighting each other. U r right let's end this debate bcuz it probably won't go anywhere.
I didn't insult our forefathers nor did I mention their religion nor whether they held the one nation or two nation view. I merely pointed out that it's a matter of perspective. As for the freedom struggle taking a violent turn, come on mate r u that naive? Look at the American Revolution, the French Revolution, the IRA of Ireland, etc. The list is long. The IRA members were terrorists from the British perspective but freedom fighters from the Irish perspective.
As for u mentioning ppl asking for freedom in Lahore. Yes keeping consistent with my point of view, if the majority of the ppl ask for independence and I could grant them that, I would. It's better than killing them. Take England for example, there was recently a lot of buzz of a possible Scotish secession. U see how it's done in civilized countries. They held a referendum where Scotish ppl voted Yes or No. Had it succeeded, Scotland would've been a free country. U r getting angry at me for simply pointing out things that have been done quite successfully elsewhere. Don't let ur nationalism get in the way mate. I'm not saying it simply bcuz u r Indian and Im Pakistani. I would stand by what I said even in the scenario that a plebiscite is held and Kashmiris choose India. I would support that decision just as much.
Russ/india/china/pak is a good axis but only when these long pending matters will be solved..
And i think i mentioned it clearly that a district of a state demanding freedom,means suppose 1 lakh people of that district demands freedom out of 50lakhs population of total state..so what then? In district they are in majority but from state level they are minors will u give them freedom??