What's new

There is no water on the moon.

Chinese probe has contributed nothing basically.
LOL Really don't know how you came up with that conclusion.

On the moon, China's Chang'e 3 Yutu rover finds a new type of basaltic rock
Amina Khan Contact Reporter

Sometimes fresh interplanetary discoveries can be made right next door. China’s Chang’e 3 rover has found evidence of a new type of basaltic rock in one of the dark basins on the moon.

The findings, published in the journal Nature Communications, focus on a geologically young region of the moon’s surface – and shed fresh light on the evolution of our nearest neighbor.

"We recognize a new type of lunar basalt with a distinctive chemical properties and mineral assemblage compared with the samples from Apollo and Luna, and the lunar meteorites," lead author Zongcheng Ling, a planetary scientist at Shandong University in China, said in an email. "These newly characterized basalts reveal a more diverse moon than the one that emerged from studies following the Apollo and Luna missions."

The moon might be the most familiar of celestial objects, but there’s still a whole lot we don’t know about our nearest neighbor in space. Though ground telescopes and lunar orbiters have sent back reams of data about the moon's surface and composition, neitherNASA nor Russia has sent a rover back to the moon in several decades, with the U.S. focusing on more distant worlds such as Mars. So the rocks examined, and in some cases brought back, by these missions have served to corroborate the findings from orbiting missions.

Both views are understandable – after all, the moon is basically a dead barren rock, and more distant worlds, such asMars, Europa or Enceladus, have a better chance of having life-friendly environments, whether in their past or present. But the moon is thought to be made up of Earth-stuff, born out of the planet’s own body after a collision with a Mars-sized missile – and so a fuller understanding of our lunar companion could actually reveal more about the early Earth.

In the meantime, China has thrown its hat into the lunar-visiting ring. The Chang’e 3 orbiter touched down on the moon in late 2013, releasing the Yutu, or Jade Rabbit, rover onto the surface. Although the spacecraft ran into trouble soon after landing, the data sent back has still offered a new look at the surface.

In the new paper, the researchers analyzed soil examined by the Yutu rover at the Chang’e 3 landing site, in a 450-meter-wide crater in the north of the Imbrium basin, an ancient lava floodplain that today can be seen in the larger "eye" on the face of the "man in the moon."

These rocks in lava floodplains are particularly interesting because they offer hints into parts of the moon's past that are hidden from sight, said Noah Petro, a lunar geologist at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center in Maryland who was not involved in the study.

"Because it’s something on the surface today but it came up from the deep interior ... it also tells us what’s going on beneath the surface as well," Petro said.

Yutu used its Active Particle-induced X-ray Spectrometer and Visible and Near-infrared Imaging Spectrometer to study the regolith – soil that the scientists think was recently dug out of the ground by an impact on the surface. Since that crater is relatively fresh, the soil must be fresh as well, as-yet unmixed with other debris on the lunar surface. So the researchers study this soil to understand what the subsurface of the moon looked like.

Based on the chemicals found within the dark solidified lava (known as basaltic rock), the scientists concluded that the composition of this mare (the dark basaltic plains on the moon) was quite different from the rocks in previously sampled maria. However, the results did match what remote sensing missions, such as those in orbit, were indicating about this particular area.

"It’s a really satisfying result because it in some ways validates our interpretation of remote sensing data," Petro said. "By getting this ground truth of what the composition is at this one spot, it helps us better understand the remote data."

And in the rock material examined in this spot – an area that’s roughly 3 billion years old – the researchers discovered a surprising mix of chemical abundances, relatively rich in titanium dioxide and also in the mineral olivine (a magnesium iron silicate). In all likelihood, the basaltic rocks probably developed late in the history of the magma ocean that seeded them.

"We think the Moon's surface and interior are more complex than we ever thought," Ling said. "Our findings provide some new constraints on some of the youngest lunar volcanisms and the mantle evolution histories."

The moon would have looked slightly different 3 billion years ago than it does today, Petro said, with a few warm spots left on its mostly cooled surface.

"If you were a time traveler and went back ... you would have seen areas glowing with small volcanic eruptions," Petro said. A few of the small but signature craters pocking its surface would not yet exist.


There are still plenty of unanswered questions about this new lunar basalt that Ling says scientists are hoping to answer by continuing to study the basalts using data from other lunar explorers and meteorites – chunks of the moon that fall to Earth.

"We will also look forward for future lunar mission (like the sample return mission by Chang'e-5) which can help to resolve these puzzles," Ling added.


http://www.latimes.com/science/scie...n-rover-rock-chang-e-yutu-20151222-story.html

See also: http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblo...n-mission-solves-long-standing-mysteries.html

"Beyond Apollo" --China's Chang'e-3 Moon Mission Solves Long-standing Mysteries
 
Last edited:
Even if one or some parties claimed they have found "water" on the Moon, I wonder the trace of so miniscule quantity in its basic or solid state on the Moon can really arouse the excitement of using any amount of it for the most basic life-form's consumption, let alone for humans. This makes human inhabitation on the Moon a very distant dream from reality
 
Even if one or some parties claimed they have found "water" on the Moon, I wonder the trace of so miniscule quantity in its basic or solid state on the Moon can really arouse the excitement of using any amount of it for the most basic life-form's consumption, let alone for humans. This makes human inhabitation on the Moon a very distant dream from reality

Yes. That was always a view which had the maximum supporters even when the nasa revelation about miniscule amount of water presence around the moon poles was broken. That's the reason you will always find the likes of Musks talking about human habitation on Mars and never ever mention Moon.
 
can they just take pictures of the lunar module left behind by Niel and other's and end the conspiracy once and for all?
The lunar rover probably did but the pics are not released to the public.

I remember these which are magnificent

199l2se50j04qgif.gif


199i228lyj9mygif.gif


1_201312151405361srYW.gif


f25ub_6Bxf852xy7vUBEDzP0QPKa8G_6YgYSO1VUeAqfAQAAaAEAAEdJ.gif


chang_e_3_landing_site_ken_kremer_pano_3.jpg


MOON_CHINA_YUTU_LANDING.jpg


U45P5029DT20140111095850.jpg


news-121513a-lg.jpg


Guys check this out:


Though the Chinese Space Agency seemed to have confirmed the (first?) Apollo landing was not a bogus hoopla, the creator of the above youtube video appears to have a sound argument over soil and rock formations of Chang'e vs Apollo. What do you think?

ps forget about UFOs and abnormal rock shapes which I think were due to photo-angles and coincidences

What video is the first pic?
 
I will not poison your pure religious mind any furthur with superstitious stuff scientists believe in :D

You might wanna poison with scientific methods since my comment is based on the non-religious ground. According to the report, there is around 75% water on the Earth which we barely able to use the resource closer to 5-10%.

Besides, beep laws is based on superstitious stuffs, doesn't it? :D
 
I guess it is consistent with the Holy Book. The water comes from the heaven as it pours into Earth. We need to figure out heaven part that might be closer to Earth as it is source of water.

Shame there is no water on moon, or at least, from the findings in this thread. ;(

Heaven = Space ???
 
What video is the first pic?

It's a showing of the mastery of the technique of "soft landing" on a natural satellite that @terranMarine has posted for you in a more detailed vid.

We have also mastered the manned and unmanned rendezvous and docking of 2 spacecraft in space during our earlier Shengzhou and Tiangong missions.

We are going to do the manouvre again soon after the launching of a brand new Tiangong 2 and Shenzhou 11 respectively on 2 separate days later this year. Two carrying rockets CZ-2Fs have reached the launching site at Jiuquan already for preparation and final checking

Let's revisit the previous fascinating docking process again:



hqdefault.jpg




 
Back
Top Bottom