Windjammer
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2009
- Messages
- 41,319
- Reaction score
- 181
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I like JH-7. Seems like the best platform for naval strike role.
JH7 is failed product. It's been modified many times. A maintenance nightmare.I like JH-7. Seems like the best platform for naval strike role.
How so ??Photoshopped pics,
Not all only 1st post picHow so ??
It's under powered and design does not allow facing futuristic threats, PN have rejected it in all manners again and again.
1st pic is a picture taken from a PAF calendar...and I can guarantee to your disappointment that it is legit real and not photoshopped.Not all only 1st post pic
Even a blind person can pick out the heat from exhausts of the aircraft, however if you are still having some issues then apply this liberally.Photoshopped pics,
Hi,
How do you know it is under powered---and about futuristic threats?
" Evain eee bongi maar ditti aiy ".
Just because Paf has rejected it does not mean the aircraft has issues---.
The paf also rejected the Grippen---and to top all---it rejected the Rafale---and then later claimed that they did not know it was that good---.
The Paf had also rejected the F7PG as well initially---the Paf was forced into getting the air craft and then t hey were praises---.
If you still have not learned that the Paf are totally fkd up fools---then it is a tragedy.
By the way---Why the fck would you want a bomber / strike aircraft to be powerful---.
The F14 tomcat was under powered and so was the F18---and the F4 phantom as well---. The B52 is underpowered and so is the A10 warthog---.
You never send F16 pilots to test drive a strike aircraft---I mean to say---what does a race car driver know about the utility of a " diesel truck "---.