hatehs
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2023
- Messages
- 1,901
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
Why don't you go outside and rape some women instead of posting about doing it over here?Why don't you get on your horse and invade India like Ghazni.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why don't you go outside and rape some women instead of posting about doing it over here?Why don't you get on your horse and invade India like Ghazni.
I think you are mistaking me some one else. Sanghis have a Muslim rape fanatasy.Why don't you go outside and rape some women instead of posting about doing it over here?
what nonsense you talking.
according you there is no god, then how can you ascribe any quality based on religion.
During the same period (1920s-30s), another (though lesser known) Islamic scholar in undivided India got smitten by the 1917 Russian revolution and Marxism.
Hafiz Rahman Sihwarwl saw Islam and Marxism sharing five elements in common: (1) prohibition of the accumulation of wealth in the hands of the privileged classes (2) organisation of the economic structure of the state to ensure social welfare (3) equality of opportunity for all human beings (4) priority of collective social interest over individual privilege and (5) prevention of the permanentising of class structure through social revolution.
The motivations for many of these themes he drew from the Qur’an, which he understood as seeking to create an economic order in which the rich pay excessive, though voluntary taxes (Zakat) to minimise differences in living standards.
In the areas that Sihwarwl saw Islam and communism diverge were Islam’s sanction of private ownership within certain limits, and in its refusal to recognise an absolutely classless basis of society.
He suggested that Islam, with its prohibition of the accumulation of wealth, is able to control the class structure through equality of opportunity.
Basically, both Sindhi and Sihwarwl had stumbled upon an Islamic concept of the social democratic welfare state.
Building upon the initial thoughts of Sindhi and Sihwarwl were perhaps South Asia’s two most ardent and articulate supporters and theoreticians of Islamic Socilaism: Ghulam Ahmed Parvez and Dr. Khalifa Abdul Hakim.
Parvez was a prominent ‘Quranist’, or an Islamic scholar who insisted that for the Muslims to make progress in the modern world, Islamic thought and laws should be entirely based on the modern interpretations of the Qu’ran and on the complete rejection of the hadith (sayings of the Prophet and his companions based on hearsay and compiled over a 100 years after the Prophet’s demise).
After studying traditional Muslim texts, as well as Sufism, Parvez claimed that almost all hadiths were fabrications by those who wanted Islam to seem like an intolerant faith and by ancient Muslim kings who used these hadiths to give divine legitimacy to their tyrannical rules.
Parvez also insisted that Muslims should spend more time studying the modern sciences instead of wasting their energies on fighting out ancient sectarian conflicts or ignoring the true egalitarian and enlightening spirit of the Qu’ran by indulging in multiple rituals handed down to them by ancient ulema, clerics and compilers of the hadith.
Understandably, Parvez was right away attacked by conservative Islamic scholars and political outfits.
But this didn’t stop famous Muslim philosopher and poet, Muhammad Iqbal, to befriend the young scholar and then introduce him to the future founder of Pakistan, Muhammad Ali Jinnah.
Jinnah appointed Parvez to edit a magazine, Talu-e-Islam. It was set-up to propagate the creation of a separate Muslim country and to also answer the attacks that Jinnah’s All India Muslim League had begun to face from conservative Islamic parties and ulema who accused the League of being a pseudo-Muslim organisation and Jinnah for being too westernised and ‘lacking correct Islamic behavior.’
Apart from continuing to author books and commentaries on the Qu’ran, Parvez wrote a series of articles in Talu-e-Islam that propagated a more socialistic view of the holy book.
In a series of essays for the magazine he used verses from the Qu’ran, incidents from the faith’s history and insights from the writings of Muhammad Iqbal to claim:
The clergy and conservative ulema have hijacked Islam.
They are agents of the rich people and promoters of uncontrolled Capitalism.
Socialism best enforces Qur’anic dictums on property, justice and distribution of wealth.
Islam’s main mission was the eradication of all injustices and cruelties from society. It was a socio-economic movement, and the Prophet was a leader seeking to put an end to the capitalist exploitation of the Quraysh merchants and the corrupt bureaucracy of Byzantium and Persia.
According to the Qur’an, Muslims have three main responsibilities: seeing, hearing and sensing through the agency of the mind. Consequently, real knowledge is based on empirically verifiable observation, or through the role of science.
Poverty is the punishment of God and deserved by those who ignore science.
In Muslim/Islamic societies, science, as well as agrarian reform should play leading roles in developing an industrialised economy.
A socialist path is a correction of the medieval distortion of Islam through Shari’a.
Parvez joined the government after the creation of Pakistan in 1947, but after Jinnah’s death in 1948, he was sidelined until he resigned from his post in 1956.
Here comes a peaceful secular HinduShe can go to Pakistan to slaughter a cow
its not artificial when they actually live in nice houses as opposed to some filthy gutter slum and drive nice cars as opposed to dhakka khaing on filthy public transport.By "Begga" he meant Beggar, yes ? Bhakts are ardent Capitalists, middle class most of the time, who have contempt for those below them on the ladder of that artificial wall called Money.
stfu, bhikariHindutvaad-inspired Deobandi cult has made it that way :
Original Islam was a Socialist revolution ...read this thread of mine from 2016 ...about Modern Communist and Socialist activism among Muslims since the early 1900s.
no such thing as "positive discrimination" apart from when only allowing the best through.For fact's sake, I was always in the General section but I understand why there is Reservation / Quota system ( positive discrimination ) for Shudras, Dalits and tribals in the schooling system and government employment.
We don't want to be India destroying itselfWhy don't you get on your horse and invade India like Ghazni.
its not artificial when they actually live in nice houses as opposed to some filthy gutter slum and drive nice cars as opposed to dhakka khaing on filthy public transport.
no such thing as "positive discrimination" apart from when only allowing the best through.
He didn't say you rape Muslim women but any womanI think you are mistaking me some one else. Sanghis have a Muslim rape fanatasy.
I don't want Muslim women.
You are an interesting person. I would love to get to know you better. How would you describe yourself.
the meek ain't inheriting shite, sonThere will come a time when the Capitalists will have to beg from the former beggars. This is the natural course of things.
I'd hired a driver once, fir pta laga he was a reservation chaap so I fired him and hired some brahmin guys to replace him.1. "Positive discrimination" was for the understanding of non-Indians. They won't understand "Reservation" and "Quota".
What a weird name for a PakistaniHere comes a peaceful secular Hindu
the meek ain't inheriting shite, son
I'd hired a driver once, fir pta laga he was a reservation chaap so I fired him and hired some brahmin guys to replace him.
-----
ever hired or fired anyone @jamahir ?
mast feeling hai, spl when legit
the meek ain't inheriting shite, son