alpha proton
FULL MEMBER
New Recruit
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2010
- Messages
- 83
- Reaction score
- 0
^^^
I predicted about it a moment ago.
I predicted about it a moment ago.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
New Recruit
That was given as a response for the trade... A powerful lobby is equally powerful than a trade partner..
The statement of "India still a leader in NAM" sound like India of 20th century than India of 21st century. As for India a rising power, no one is disputing that. But many countries are rising powers out there so India is not unique. As for India is too big to get into one camp, I have to disagree with you on that as India currently is not that big and if it one day become very big, then it can reevalute its strategy. But do not base its foreign relationship strategy on its economy projections.
^^^
I predicted about it a moment ago.
New Recruit
You are again wrong in your prediction
And I was responding to your statement as well. Please go read it again.
I'm sure that is what you thought before 1962 as well.
Which may have been the reason India chose to host the Tibetan government in exile, backstabbing China in 1959, despite the silly talk of Hindi Chini bhai bhai, which was of course invented by India.
New Recruit
I think i did put my stand correctly... a powerful lobby is as powerful as trading partner.. and your response for lobby restriction in this forum "does it make any sense in the debate?"
Your opinion is of now ones concern on India being a 20th century leader in NAM.. India is still a active member.. It will still be and will never join any ones camp..
What is big in your dictionary??.. Right now US herself wants India to become a strategic partner.. and looks for close Indo-US friendship.. never ever it iterated to join its camp like Taiwan, Singapore for the matter of fact Israel... US very well nows India is as much big as Europe.. In economic terms Foreign relationship is very much needed for boosting the economy...
Just scroll above idiot,and see above ,I already alerted him for insults and attack
I think i did put my stand correctly... a powerful lobby is as powerful as trading partner.. and your response for lobby restriction in this forum "does it make any sense in the debate?"
New Recruit
I was providing objective analysis, not insults or attacks...
Agreed..India is not even a top 10 economy. India is growing but it still has a long long way to go before its start to surpass its former colonial master. So until it get there, lets stop the talking and start working.
Pakistan is there ally not a strategic partner.. US never want war between us ... And do you think US is looking for a growing Asian economy?? US interest in Asia because of growing economies like Singapore, Taiwan and its investment in this place.. US forecast on Asia economy is what making it to lobby here.. Otherwise Asia is another Africa for US... For maintaining peace it is one of duty of Superpower and so is Russia doing the same...As for US want India to be a strategic partner, it is true. US want both India and Pakistan to be strategic partners and to ensure that these two countries do not attack one another. Only the US is capable of maintaining the peace of South Asia(And I mean by political clout, not using military muscles) . And a peaceful South Asia is important to continuous growth of Asian economy. As you said, India a such a growing power.
Exactly this is my intention.. India may be backward in European capabilities ... but its billion population is its wealth... So you can agree that India can never be any one's camp...As for India is as big as Europe.. I would agree when you are comparing the population, India is much bigger. But using any other measurement, India is has no similarities to Europe as a whole in any statistics.
What I'm saying is that only Israel has a powerful lobby. All other countries lobby is actually not as important (and not as powerful). They are just back by actual strength instead of the power of lobbying.
I do not see any powerful Indian lobby outside of this forum.
and slums always become part of ur objective analysis,even when it is not required.