The Reason IAF Failed - BS Dhanoa

[Sulman Badshah]

Lol .. he is saying FLIR imagery as " Puranay zamanay ki black and white image"

 

[Tejas Spokesman]

Lol .. he is saying FLIR imagery as " Puranay zamanay ki black and white image"

What PAF showed was definetly not FLIR based on frame rate.

 

[Nancy]

After 27 feb, my father who is a critic said that India would bomb us and the our military won't do anything because they are not capable.If it wasn't for Abhinandan no one would have believed anything coming from Pakistan military . Due to social media everyone is now more aware.

is this the Pilot who got returned in less than 72 hours. Indians must have threaten Pakistan. US will not release in 72 years as well.

 

[Haris Ali2140]

is this the Pilot who got returned in less than 72 hours. Indians must have threaten Pakistan. US will not release in 72 years as well.

We gained moral ground. He was of no use to us.

 

[Mav3rick]

1. DG ISPR said no F-16 crossed the LOC. We can use f-16 in our own territory for defensive role.They wanted to portray that we used f-16s for bombing.

2. Our objective was to show that any mischief from them will be properly answered. If we dropped the bombs at the targets which were their ammunation depots the situation would have escalalted. Now as for their capabilities their AD shot down ther own chopper carrying six personals.

3. Why would US make a statement???Its not their job. LM would never be invited. You don't invite every tom,dick and harry to inspect your equipment. And they would never invite an audit of their own planes.Their is an old video from BBC here in which the issue is sam. Indians claimed shooting down a plane & the pilot while the pilot is talking to BBC.

If you want to engage me merely because of your love for the forces and patriotism, which are interlinked enforced only because of the constant propaganda that somehow our forces are doing something which no other force of the world is doing, then please save us both some time. Otherwise, here it goes:

1. DG ISPR very clearly said that NO F-16's were used today in any operation, it was not correct.
2. Why should we be afraid of escalation when the enemy is not afraid of attacking us, are we weak?
3. Precisely, the US never released any official statement. They never really conducted any count. However, in 1965, we had invited neutral count of our Fighters, to prove a point......we could have done the same this time around too, as proof that the Government of India would go to any length to lie to their public. But, we ended up on the defensive because of the whole mess of the 2nd pilot, which is still a mystery (who was the injured pilot admitted to the hospital?).

 

[Nancy]

We gained moral ground. He was of no use to us.

Pilot was one of the lucky person on this planet.

 

[Haris Ali2140]

If you want to engage me merely because of your love for the forces and patriotism, which are interlinked enforced only because of the constant propaganda that somehow our forces are doing something which no other force of the world is doing, then please save us both some time. Otherwise, here it goes:

1. DG ISPR very clearly said that NO F-16's were used today in any operation, it was not correct.
2. Why should we be afraid of escalation when the enemy is not afraid of attacking us, are we weak?
3. Precisely, the US never released any official statement. They never really conducted any count. However, in 1965, we had invited neutral count of our Fighters, to prove a point......we could have done the same this time around too, as proof that the Government of India would go to any length to lie to their public. But, we ended up on the defensive because of the whole mess of the 2nd pilot, which is still a mystery (who was the injured pilot admitted to the hospital?).

1. Yes it wasn't used in the operation. The operation was conducted by mirages.
2. Yes we are weak. We are only protected by nuclear umbrella.
3. There are US military persons present in Pakistan for check of F-16s. Where does an injured person goes???

 

[Cuirassier]

If you want to engage me merely because of your love for the forces and patriotism, which are interlinked enforced only because of the constant propaganda that somehow our forces are doing something which no other force of the world is doing, then please save us both some time. Otherwise, here it goes:

1. DG ISPR very clearly said that NO F-16's were used today in any operation, it was not correct.
2. Why should we be afraid of escalation when the enemy is not afraid of attacking us, are we weak?
3. Precisely, the US never released any official statement. They never really conducted any count. However, in 1965, we had invited neutral count of our Fighters, to prove a point......we could have done the same this time around too, as proof that the Government of India would go to any length to lie to their public. But, we ended up on the defensive because of the whole mess of the 2nd pilot, which is still a mystery (who was the injured pilot admitted to the hospital?).

So you're saying Lara Seligman is a liar?

 

[Wrath]

you respected them? not PAF!

Yeah exactly did you sir @Imran Khan

 

[Wrath]

Videos must have transcript too. Can't go through all that ear rape.

Pffffff [emoji28][emoji28]

 

[Wrath]

The mystery of the 2nd pilot HAS to be solved. And a voluntary official audit count of F-16's must be carried out by neutral assessors with a challenge to IAF to do the same with SU-30MKIs.

They already crashed their SU-30 MKI a few weeks ago , so can't challenge them and secondly , American officials came and they counted all F-16's and none of them was missing.

 

[Ultima Thule]

Lockheed Martin made it very clear that they did NOT conduct any audit of PAF F-16's. It's just too convenient to say that the 2nd pilot was a miscommunication, can we expect such of a professional force?

And pentagon confirmed that none of our F-16 were at 27 Feb, its not job for Lockheed Martin to conduct audit our F-16 Lockheed Martin is just a defense contractor/aircraft manufacture for Pentagon/DOD of US, think logically, use the commonsense@Mav3rick

Which one exactly, there were so many articles on the engagement b/w PAF & IAF. And I am NOT calling anyone a liar, I merely want proof before I accept the events as described by either side.

look it for yourself
@Mav3rick
https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/04/04/did-india-shoot-down-a-pakistani-jet-u-s-count-says-no/
and there was twitt of corespondent of Pentagon for Foreign policy, THAT NO PAF F-16 WERE MISSING @Mav3rick

If you want to engage me merely because of your love for the forces and patriotism, which are interlinked enforced only because of the constant propaganda that somehow our forces are doing something which no other force of the world is doing, then please save us both some time. Otherwise, here it goes:

1. DG ISPR very clearly said that NO F-16's were used today in any operation, it was not correct.
2. Why should we be afraid of escalation when the enemy is not afraid of attacking us, are we weak?
3. Precisely, the US never released any official statement. They never really conducted any count. However, in 1965, we had invited neutral count of our Fighters, to prove a point......we could have done the same this time around too, as proof that the Government of India would go to any length to lie to their public. But, we ended up on the defensive because of the whole mess of the 2nd pilot, which is still a mystery (who was the injured pilot admitted to the hospital?).

So you consider Pentagon corespondent for Foreign policy was a liar @Mav3rick

is this the Pilot who got returned in less than 72 hours. Indians must have threaten Pakistan. US will not release in 72 years as well.

Ever heard Geneva convention you troll @Nancy

 

[Nancy]

And pentagon confirmed that none of our F-16 were at 27 Feb, its not job for Lockheed Martin to conduct audit our F-16 Lockheed Martin is just a defense contractor/aircraft manufacture for Pentagon/DOD of US, think logically, use the commonsense@Mav3rick

look it for yourself
@Mav3rick
https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/04/04/did-india-shoot-down-a-pakistani-jet-u-s-count-says-no/
and there was twitt of corespondent of Pentagon for Foreign policy, THAT NO PAF F-16 WERE MISSING @Mav3rick

So you consider Pentagon corespondent for Foreign policy was a liar @Mav3rick


Ever heard Geneva convention you troll @Nancy

No, we dont really follow Geneva.

 

[Suriya]

and there was twitt of corespondent of Pentagon for Foreign policy, THAT NO PAF F-16 WERE MISSING @Mav3rick

So you consider Pentagon corespondent for Foreign policy was a liar @Mav3rick


Ever heard Geneva convention you troll @Nancy

There is a sea of difference between a media correspondent covering Pentagon and Pentagon spokie.

FYI, pentagon or any other US govt official didn't give credence to the news piece at appeared on Foreign policy mag.

 

[pakpride00090]

There is a sea of difference between a media correspondent covering Pentagon and Pentagon spokie.

FYI, pentagon or any other US govt official didn't give credence to the news piece at appeared on Foreign policy mag.

The only source for that is Hindustan times which is an Indian media outlet hence totally unreliable. If you can directly source an independent , we can look into that.

Besides, a pentagon correspondent in US has far more credibility than any Indian media outlet. Personnel of US military are always present on airfields to monitor F-16s and provide support.

Show me a non-indian source. Only gullible and retarded gangus will buy a still image of radar and be convinced. I mean afterall I don't blame them.

1.When you fail to hit your targets and then try to act over-smart by saying "Political objectives" to cover your failures. No videos , no anything

2. To further add the humiliation , shot down own helo and killed 6 gangu officers. What a great example of professionalism , I must say

3. No evidence provided to support accurate strikes or even shooting down any plane. No dynamic images or videos.

Pathetic . All you have are baseless theories and a pathetic ability to cook things up in-order to come at top. But as they say talk is cheap. Only gullible Indians have bought this narrative. No independent sources have been able to verify gangu claims.