Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wrora, you are adding oil to water. As far as I have read, Abdur Rahman hardly had any agreements or power regarding present day Tajikistan and present day Uzbekistan because those areas were under Turkistan, not Afghanistan/Khorasan. And Iran never 'ruled' over us, we were a part of one country and decided to split WITH the consent of Tajiks and even Hazaras. Us claiming Iran or Iran claiming us is same like Pakistan and India claiming eachother because just like Pak-Indo, even Afghanistan and Iran went through fights to separate. We weren't sold by Iran, nor did we sell Iran.then why should not we claim on Iran, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan etc because those territories were part of our empires and also why should not Iranians claim on our country because they ruled us for many centuries and our soil was part of their empire?
Once again, Tajiks back then in huge numbers joined Abdali to join Afghanistan/Khorasan, they weren't forced to. What do you think tribal areas of KPK are about? Have you got any similar tribal issues in Tajikistan or Iran? Even those governments who argue the contract is valid are eager to make Afghan government recognize it, the agreement by far isn't as black-and-white as you take it to be.People might say that the border between Pakistan and Afghanistan have divided tribes and same people from each other, i would argue that the Tajiks also have been divided by the border with Tajikistan, Samarqand, Bukhara and Iran, we are the same people we are all persians/tajiks and there shouldnt be any border.
And now the question arises, did we lose that land during a fight, OR during an 'agreement'? Note that there is a massive difference between both and by no means do the same rules apply for either of our loss.hope you agree with me this time that Panjdeh and its surrounding areas including historical Merv was part of the territory which was controlled by Afghanistan as a matter of fact it was our natural part of the country for centuries, during an attack by the Russians those areas were taken from Afghanistan and became part of Russian controlled territory----and this happened during Abdul Rahman Khan.
Isn't your issue an ethnic one either? Hasn't Massoud's or Rabbani's point of joining anti-government funds been an ethnic one as well? That's what politics does, create doubts and insecurity in the very same hearts which claim to be pure and honest.Is it a double standards? Is it hypocracy? or is it a desire based on ethnic dominance? I personally believe that the last one is correct---it is nothing but ethnic issue, otherwise why me as a tajik forcefully reject the idea of KPK to be separated from Pakistan.
Afghans as individuals never (re)claimed KPK to begin with, it was the government. How many individuals did you find back then in Kabul who would shout out for KPK? How many of them can you find in present day, infact? Ask me as an individual and my main concern will vanish once from Herat, to Kabul, to Kandahar people start living same harmonious life they once used to. Afghanistan got enough population to look after and every Afghan's main concern should be reuniting of the scattered ethnics, not issues regarding their fellow blood brothers across whatever border. Reason why SOME (only some) Afghan Pashtuns are still worried about KPK is actually quiet recent and that also because of the ongoing tension between both governments. Some people infact exaggerate by thinking Afghan government's main issue in Durrand Line, which is hardly a topic at the parliament these days.If you don't agree with my above argument then i present a second argument on why we must never claim on KPK,
Yes, there is a strong feeling and talk about getting KPK from pakistan among our Pashtoons, it doesnt matter if they are islamist or secularist- they all talk the same when it comes to kpk. And this issue of(non issue) of NWFP has got nothing to do with the other Afghans but our Pashtoons. It is purely ethnic matter and that is it.
The motivations behind Pakistans backing of the Taliban, for example, were no different from the motivations that had led Islamabad to back Gulbuddin Hekmatyar. When it became obvious that Hekmatyar would neither be able to seize Kabul nor recognize the Durand Line, Pakistan simply shifted its support to the Taliban.
Despite Islamabads support, the Taliban did not accept the Durand Line as the international border.
Link
New Recruit
Feel free to give those waste of space a punch on my behalf next time, no joke. I can't believe ANYONE can say that, and that also regarding an entire country which is much bigger and much more stable.Though living in the US i do see a sizable afghan community here, and most of them claim that Pakistan should be there land.
New Recruit