What's new

The New Pakistan US Relationship (After the Salala Check-Post Attack)

Is this rat already selling out Pakistan by resuming NATO transit?


Yes

General Dempsey asked the Pakistani Army chief, Gen. Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, in a phone call on Wednesday if the relationship could be repaired, a person briefed on the conversation said. General Kayani said that he thought it could, but that Pakistan needed some space.
 
A threat is potent only till the time the recipient of the threat has an option to avoid that becoming a reality..

Psychologically: threat is patent till the time the recipient holds permanent phobia of falling into reality of threat so recipient will adopt choices in leverage of possible threat.

In Pakistan-US scenario situation is Visa-versa. Both sides aware the result of negative relations and feelings of potential threat is disturbing US but not Pakistan.
 
Psychologically: threat is patent till the time the recipient holds permanent phobia of falling into reality of threat so recipient will adopt choices in leverage of possible threat.

In Pakistan-US scenario situation is Visa-versa. Both sides aware the result of negative relations and feelings of potential threat is disturbing US but not Pakistan.

True, but once US is certain that the only thing it needs from Pakistan (supply routes) are no longer possible, that threat is gone..
 
Revised US ties made conditional on civil N-technology


ISLAMABAD: The Parliamentary Committee on National Security (PCNS) on Wednesday finalised its draft recommendations for new terms of engagement with the United States and the future of Nato supplies from Pakistan. The Committee declared that the basis of the new relationship should be conditional on the agreement to transfer civil nuclear technology to Pakistan so that Pakistan could control its energy crisis.

The PCNS declared that greater access of Pakistani products to the US and European markets should be ensured. The PCNS met Wednesday with Mian Raza Rabbani in the chair here at the Parliament House. According to sources, the committee asked for a complete halt to drone attacks, ensuring respect for national sovereignty and territorial integrity of Pakistan and a guarantee of the non-transgression of Pakistan’s frontiers in the future.

Sources said the draft proposal also sought a complete ban on Nato supplies from Pakistan. It was further said that bilateral relationships should be organised at an equal level and no drone attack will be carried out on the soil of Pakistan in the future.

Raza Rabbani, while talking to journalists after the meeting, said the committee had finalised draft recommendations for new terms of engagement with the US and matters relating to the suspension on Nato supplies. He said the recommendations were finalised through consensus.

To a question about the ISI chief’s meeting with US officials in Doha, Raza Rabbani said that the committee had no knowledge about it and the Foreign Office too was unaware of any such meeting.

Rabbani said the PCNS had summoned the finance minister and his team today (Thursday) to give a briefing on the financial implications on Pakistan if it opted for complete suspension of Nato supplies. “If we feel that any amendments are needed in the draft recommendations after the briefing by the Finance Ministry, we can make changes,” he told the media.

He said the committee had also summoned the secretaries of the Ministries of Defence and Foreign Affairs next Tuesday to share the draft recommendations with them before handing them over to the government to be presented at the joint sitting of Parliament.





Revised US ties made conditional on civil N-technology
 
Great effort, but i think its too late. Not going to happen really....:cry:
However, i think the drone attacks may be stopped.
 
Great effort, but i think its too late. Not going to happen really....:cry:
However, i think the drone attacks may be stopped.
Its not late actually because US was never willing to offer Pakistan civil nuclear tech ... It wasn't even possible at the height of Pak-US relationship let alone now ...

I dont think there has been any drone attack after NATO supply blockade ... I may be wrong though
 
i think instead of nuclear we should ask their support and assistance in hydral and coal, they have ability y to influence world bank for loans for basha dam and thar project, this would be even greater sucess than nuclear deal.


alternativly we ask them to finace or support the qatar-pakistan gas pipeline...

its time our leaders learn diplomacy...the transient fee should be worth something not pathetic 50 million a month!
 
US officials now talk with Haqqanis 'positive role' .......switch from 'do more' pressures on North Wazirisitan and Chief Kiyani.


Afghan endgame: US ready for Haqqani talks


318742-Talibantalks-1326070329-982-640x480.jpg

The US is now arguing that the Haqqani network has a ‘pivotal role’ in any future political dispensation of Afghanistan.

ISLAMABAD: Despite having suffered serious setbacks in the aftermath of the November 26 Nato airstrikes which killed 24 Pakistani soldiers, Washington and Islamabad have continued ‘dialogue’ even amidst flaring tensions.

The US has taken Pakistan into confidence over the unprecedented development of allowing the Taliban a political office in Qatar to advance the Afghan reconciliation process, sources revealed.

A senior Pakistani official stated that the Obama administration not only sought Pakistan’s consent over the Taliban office but had also given a ‘green light’ to allow the deadliest Afghan insurgent group, the Haqqani network, to be a part of the reconciliation process.

The move by Washington was a clear deflection from its previous policy of keeping Islamabad at bay over its peace overtures with the Afghan Taliban.

“Yes, we were onboard,” said the senior Pakistani official referring to the latest push by Washington to seek a political settlement of the Afghan conflict.

The US has long resisted talks with the Haqqani network, believed to be based in the North Waziristan Agency.

Contrary to Washington’s prior stance, the country’s military establishment is now looking to avoid confronting the Haqqanis head on, arguing that the group has a ‘pivotal role’ in any future political dispensation of Afghanistan.

“They [Americans] are now following the same approach that we have been advocating for years,” said a security official, requesting not to be named. The official added that Chief of Army Staff General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani himself conveyed to US President Barack Obama in late 2010 that a solution to the decade-old conflict in Afghanistan could only come through the meaningful talks with the Taliban.

The Pakistan military had even urged the US to announce a ceasefire in Afghanistan creating “favourable conditions for talks with the insurgents”, it was disclosed. But Washington, instead of following that policy, initiated talks with the Taliban on its own, said the official.

“The CIA had attempted to woo certain Taliban individuals but their efforts failed because those people had nothing to do with the Taliban,” commented defence analyst Brig (retd) Mehmood Shah.

Shah – the former security secretary of the Federal Administered Tribal Areas (Fata) – said the opening of the Taliban office was certainly a “positive development”.

An American diplomat also confirmed that the two countries have been engaging in dialogue on the Afghan endgame despite the recent hiccup in the relationship in the wake of the Nato attacks.

“We have already acknowledged that Pakistan has a critical role in the Afghan reconciliation process,” said the diplomat, who requested to remain anonymous.

Meanwhile, a Pakistani security official accepted the fact that despite Islamabad’s strong reaction to the Salala attack, the US did not escalate the situation further.

“The US approach has allowed us to keep the channel of communication open with them,” said the official.

The Express Tribune further learnt that Pakistan has asked the US not to send any senior officials to the country for the time being, bearing in mind the growing US resentment over the hugely unpopular Nato airstrikes.

Another western diplomat pointed out that Pakistan could have taken far worse steps than what was actually done after the Nato attack.

“The blocking of Nato supplies is of course a big decision, but it certainly isn’t a drastic step,” the diplomat told The Express Tribune.

“Had Pakistan denied its airspace to the Nato forces, that would have been a disaster,” he remarked.

(Pakistan-US relations: year end review)

Published in The Express Tribune, January 9th, 2012.
 
The Afghan Tliban won't give no lift to US , I guess...US is just dreaming of it........:smokin:
 
See, if it had to come down to talks eventually ( and it always does)

why was so much human blood wasted ?
 
CIA likely to resume drone strikes
By Zia Khan
Published: January 9, 2012
ISLAMABAD: America’s Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) is likely to resume the drone campaign that it had apparently called off following a deadly Nato airstrike on Pakistani border posts in the Mohmand tribal region on November 26, 2011. However, this time around, the frequency and intensity of attacks by pilot-less aircraft would not be as high as it was in the past.
Sources told The Express Tribune on Sunday that both sides have almost agreed on ‘fresh terms of engagements’ to resume drone attacks against suspected al Qaeda members and their local facilitators hiding in the tribal areas, including North and South Waziristan.
The deadly aircraft operated from the CIA Headquarters at Langley in McClean, Virginia, would now be flying from American airbases in Afghanistan, said an official privy to the developments taking place behind the scene.
The Bagram airbase, just outside the Afghan capital Kabul, might be the new launch pad for drone attacks inside Pakistan in the future, said the official.
Conditions
Though the parliamentary committee on the national security is still working out new terms of engagement with the US, it was recently reported that top intelligence officials from Pakistan and the US were already busy in secret talks to lower tensions.
Officials said the resumption of drone strikes might be under new conditions. They added that Pakistani negotiators had convinced their American counterparts on at least a couple of conditions: First, the drone strikes should not be as frequent as they were in 2010 and 2011. And second, the CIA should narrow the stripe the aircraft were targeting under the approach known as ‘box formation’ in military terms.
“We don’t want them to be that frequent … it creates problems for us by invoking public anger,” the official added, saying Pakistani authorities believed drones were ‘strategically harmful but tactically advantageous’.
About the box approach, he added that the areas the Pakistani military had already claimed to have cleared must not be hit. “We want them to be within a smaller radius,” the official explained.
Published in The Express Tribune, January 9th, 2012.
CIA likely to resume drone strikes – The Express Tribune
 
Let's wait for Pakistan official to deny this article rumors.

Sometimes reporters in Express Tribune assume too much without credible information. "Likely" "Maybe" etc
 
Back
Top Bottom