BeyondHeretic
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2013
- Messages
- 1,543
- Reaction score
- 0
With all that American training , are they preparing for war with iran?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
These two guns outperform any thing that the US has in their soldiers hand.Which turn out to be AK's, PKMS. This looks a bit out of place.
AKs is the best of the best.These two guns outperform any thing that the US has in their soldiers hand.
What seems odd is you guys have the best gear, pretty much US/NATO standards other than infantry weapons. Which turn out to be AK's, PKMS. This looks a bit out of place.
More like a war with a future alqaeda state in Syria. I doubt Iraq will ever go to war with Iran Again.With all that American training , are they preparing for war with iran?
Most of the gear is locally hand-made. The army supplies only the basics. Soldiers usually go to licensed shops which sell only to people with ID. There were plans to upgrade all the guns to American m-16 a4, but cost+ performance problems stopped that. M-16 have smaller bullets and require more maintenance. They also cost much more to buy and maintain. Ak's are already present in iraq, there is no need to buy them. They require less maintenance and do more damage because of the bigger rounds.
More like a war with a future alqaeda state in Syria. I doubt Iraq will ever go to war with Iran Again.
Ak 47 might be powerful but they lack trajectory and have a high recoil with a low rate of fire. But i can see the ease of handling and maintanance and the low cost.
Can you name a rifle with high rate of fire? also I want to know why the m-16 or g-36 better plze I have no idea.
But this rate of 550-600 is the most common one plus u need something dependable not cute in the battle ground. As I said I have no idea but in the top 10 rifles by discovery the experts said it's the best.Ak has a 550-600 RPM (rounds per minute) and an M-16A4 has 900 RPM. They arent necessarily better but more compact, lightweight, low recoil, but at the cost of maintenance, reliability, calibre and stoppage power.
It depends on the army's doctrine which rifle is chosen.
The AK47, is first of all an assault rifle deadly in the fifty meter area were most the kills happen. For infantry guy who jump out of a BMP or a truck, if he point the rifle to the ground before his jump, at the contact moment with ground, if he fires, the bullet will fall exactly at 50m. That reason behind the shape of the rifle...the 45 degree angle design given to it.Ak 47 might be powerful but they lack trajectory and have a high recoil with a low rate of fire. But i can see the ease of handling and maintenance and the low cost.
Russians have better quality inner working parts and better steel..Yugoslavian are excellent...There are MANY AK variants in Iraq. Some are original Russian while others are copies. The best quality ones are the Russian and Yugoslavian copies. With the right fits and with good training, the AK beats the M16. But it mostly depends on the user.