What's new

The Great Game Changer: Belt and Road Intiative (BRI; OBOR)

This is news to me. I didn't know that "health" could also be part of the Silk Road.

========
China, WHO to build 'healthy' Silk Road
2017-01-19 08:53 Xinhua Editor:Xu Shanshan

c83bac419e504cdeb51b0681e8d6290c.jpg

Chinese President Xi Jinping (L) meets with World Health Organization (WHO) Director-General Margaret Chan in Geneva, Switzerland, Jan. 18, 2017. (Xinhua/Li Xueren)

China and the World Health Organization (WHO) pledged here Wednesday to step up health cooperation under the framework of the China-proposed Belt and Road Initiative.

A memorandum of understanding in this regard was signed between the two sides at the WHO headquarters in Geneva, witnessed by visiting Chinese President Xi Jinping and WHO Director-General Margaret Chan.

"China welcomes the WHO's active participation in the construction of the Belt and Road, and of a 'healthy' Silk Road," Xi said during a meeting with Chan.

Chan echoed Xi's remarks, saying that the WHO is willing to enhance cooperation with China under the framework of the Belt and Road Initiative, amid efforts to improve the public health in countries along the Belt and Road.

The Belt and Road Initiative, proposed by Xi in 2013, refers to the building of the Silk Road Economic Belt and the 21st Century Maritime Silk Road. It is aimed at building a trade and infrastructure network connecting Asia with Europe and Africa along the ancient trade routes.


6a4d4c1ade0841e9977309eb81f7e259.jpg

Chinese President Xi Jinping (2nd L) meets with World Health Organization (WHO) Director-General Margaret Chan (2nd R) in Geneva, Switzerland, Jan. 18, 2017. (Xinhua/Wu Xiaoling)
 
First freight train from China to London completes maiden journey
2017-01-19 11:15 China Daily Editor: Feng Shuang

A train traveling all the way from Yiwu on China's east coast arrived in London's Barking station on Wednesday afternoon, becoming the first direct freight train to link the UK and China, crossing the deserts, fields and mountains of Eurasia and ducking under the English channel on its epic 18-day, 12,451 km journey.

Diplomats, transport executives and members of the international media assembled to watch the China-Europe Block Train travel the last few hundred meters of the new Yiwu-London line and pull into Barking's cargo terminal on schedule at 1 pm.

"This is the latest practical outcome of China-UK cooperation on the Belt and Road Initiative," said Zhu Qin, a minister from the Chinese embassy in the UK. "Since its first journey in 2011, China Railway Express has reached many destinations in Europe and Asia. It has become a tangible link between China and Europe, a symbol of China-Europe cooperation. It has contributed greatly to connectivity in the Eurasian continent, and the economic development of the wider region."

The new service is operated by China's Yiwu Timex Industrial Investment Co, which has been running freight trains twice a week between China, Germany and Spain for more than a year.

The train's engine tugged 68 Twenty-foot Equivalent Unit (TEU) cargo containers bearing 4-million-pounds-worth of goods from Yiwu markets - household wares, clothing, fabric, bags and other small commodities. The train crossed the Chinese border at Alataw Pass, and meandered across Kazakhstan, Russia, Belarus, Poland, Germany, Belgium and France, and under the English Channel to reach the UK.

Because of differing gauges on its route, the containers were offloaded several times.

Oscar Lin, manager of the service's UK agent, London-based Onetwothree Logistics, told China Daily the service is currently accepting bookings for the return journey.

Transporting goods by train is not only half as cheap as air transport, it also takes half the time sea shipping does. The train departed in Yiwu on Jan. 1, taking just 18 days to travel 12,451 km - which is roughly the entire coastline of the United Kingdom.

Yiwu is the largest small commodities trading center in the world, and each year produces more than half the world's Christmas decorations. Exports from Yiwu to the UK had a value of 621 million dollars (502 million pounds) in 2015, and 569 million dollars (461 million pounds) from January-November 2016, representing a 10 percent increase for the same period the year before.

Rajesh Agrawal, London's deputy mayor for business, said: "The arrival of the first freight train from China shows that London is a leading destination for Chinese businesses, offering firms access to markets, expertise and capital, as well as an entry point to the West."

The new service falls in line with China's Belt and Road international development strategy is an initiative proposed by President Xi Jinping in 2013 that focuses on connectivity and cooperation among countries geographically close to China. United Kingdom has expressed its desire to be an active partner on the initiative.

Last year Lord Sassoon, a Conservative peer with extensive Chinese business links, presented Xi with the China-Britain Business Council's report on the Belt and Road Initiative, outlining several areas in which UK companies were collaborating on infrastructure and energy projects along the trade route.

.
 
This is news to me. I didn't know that "health" could also be part of the Silk Road.

========
China, WHO to build 'healthy' Silk Road
2017-01-19 08:53 Xinhua Editor:Xu Shanshan

View attachment 369585
Chinese President Xi Jinping (L) meets with World Health Organization (WHO) Director-General Margaret Chan in Geneva, Switzerland, Jan. 18, 2017. (Xinhua/Li Xueren)

China and the World Health Organization (WHO) pledged here Wednesday to step up health cooperation under the framework of the China-proposed Belt and Road Initiative.

A memorandum of understanding in this regard was signed between the two sides at the WHO headquarters in Geneva, witnessed by visiting Chinese President Xi Jinping and WHO Director-General Margaret Chan.

"China welcomes the WHO's active participation in the construction of the Belt and Road, and of a 'healthy' Silk Road," Xi said during a meeting with Chan.

Chan echoed Xi's remarks, saying that the WHO is willing to enhance cooperation with China under the framework of the Belt and Road Initiative, amid efforts to improve the public health in countries along the Belt and Road.

The Belt and Road Initiative, proposed by Xi in 2013, refers to the building of the Silk Road Economic Belt and the 21st Century Maritime Silk Road. It is aimed at building a trade and infrastructure network connecting Asia with Europe and Africa along the ancient trade routes.


View attachment 369586
Chinese President Xi Jinping (2nd L) meets with World Health Organization (WHO) Director-General Margaret Chan (2nd R) in Geneva, Switzerland, Jan. 18, 2017. (Xinhua/Wu Xiaoling)

Indeed an interesting dimension to add to the New Silk Road scheme. Then we may anticipate more dimensions to be added from culture and education to health and energy security.

I think, in the end, what OBOR intends to achieve is really create a complete new globalization. The old one served its purpose; as Gramsci said (I paraphrase), the old is dying, the new has yet to born (Gramsci said 'cannot be born').
 
Towards a stable global order

(People's Daily Online) 13:20, January 19, 2017

Muhammad Shahbaz Sharif, Chief Minister of Punjab Province, Pakistan. [Courtesy of Pakistan Embassy in China]

At the onset of 2017, the world is exposed to far graver threats to its peace, stability and security than was the case in the preceding year. With transformative changes sweeping through the United States, Europe and greater Middle East, the role of the global institutions responsible for conflict management and resolution has increased manifold.

However, a more strident view on the mushroom growth and complexity of conflicts around the world has questioned the effectiveness and relevance of the international governance architecture, stating that a manifest lack of commitment to the ideals and principles of the UN Charter explains why the world is adrift chased doggedly by chaos and turbulence.

There are serious concerns on the uncertain direction the world has taken having the potential to deepen crises in different parts of the world. The interconnected nature of these challenges becomes all the more perilous when we observe that the values and notions that have founded the globalized order are under severe attack and running the risk of unraveling in the absence of a counter-narrative.

Amid concerns and apprehensions about the future of international order, Chinese President Xi Jinping has come to represent the aspirations of the world community. His call for a participatory and broad-based governance model to regulate the world affairs has found ready listeners.

As a statesman, President Xi Jinping has had his finger on the pulse of the people when he says that reform of the existing global governance system and mechanism is necessary in view of the evolution the world landscape and major transnational challenges are undergoing. His advocacy of a shared approach on the part of the world community is premised on employing innovation to revamp the existing system in an attempt to build more ‘equitable, just and effective architecture of global governance’, one which meets the aspirations of the people.

Two initiatives of President Xi need to be talked about here that show that China is taking practical steps to set up a model of development that benefits not just her but also builds win-win partnerships aimed at distributing the fruits of prosperity.

The establishment of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) represents China’s response to the growing needs of the Asian communities for infrastructure development. This initiative is in line with China’s declared aim of making greater contribution to international development endeavors, for the Chinese are convinced that much of their progress owes itself to international cooperation. AIIB will play the leadership role in the Asian continent in terms of provision of funds for infrastructure development. This role is all the more critical when seen in the context of likely funding deficit to the tune of US$800 billion during the decade of 2010-2020 as per projection of the World Bank and Asian Development Bank.

The second initiative of President Xi Jinping is his ‘Belt and Road’ vision that has the potential to redefine global geopolitics by making ‘shared fruits of economy and trade’ the pivot of the whole dynamic concept. This initiative that proposes six corridors including the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor will eventually connect 65 plus countries through air, road, and sea routes thereby resulting in increased trade flows to the tune of US$2.5 trillion according to one estimate.

The Belt and Road Initiative is in line with the Chinese President’s vision of ‘building a community of shared interests, destiny and responsibility.’ It is a part of China’s grand strategy of deepening reform and opening-up. The ideas of win-win partnership that President Xi has espoused at every level whether it is UN General Assembly’s 70th Session in New York, G20 Hangzhou Summit in China, or 8th BRICS Summit in India, are defined by peace, inclusiveness and prosperity.

The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, which is a flagship project of the Belt and Road Initiative, is undergoing robust implementation at the moment. The projects of worth US$30 billion are being implemented. Eight industrial zones to bet set up in all the provinces of Pakistan will create investment and employment opportunities. With a major chunk of the CPEC investment i.e. US$34 billion earmarked for energy sector projects, Pakistan’s GDP will be strengthened by 2 percent straightaway on their completion.

The 13th of November 2016 will do down in history as an epoch-making day when the Prime Minister of Pakistan, flanked by top civil and military leadership of the country, inaugurated the Pilot Trade Project at a prestigious ceremony at Gwadar city. The operationalization of the Gwadar port, which is the centerpiece of the CPEC, is the best news to come in recent months. The start of the trade activity represents the realization of a cherished dream and opening of a new era of peace and development for Pakistan, South and Central Asia, and Gulf regions.

The fact that the cargo containers used the overland western route during their 3000 km long movement from Kashgar to Gwadar sends multiple messages. It proves that Pakistan is a peaceful country and the CPEC route has been fully secured, thanks to elaborate security arrangements made by the government of Pakistan. The way people showed their warmth and excitement as the caravans passed through different regions shows the popular ownership of the CPEC project.

I would take the opportunity to thank the Chinese leadership particularly President Xi Jinping and Premier Li Keqiang for their highly dynamic and proactive role in the success of the whole endeavor. The opening of Gwadar port for international trade is the result of unity of thought and close coordination between our two governments.

The successful implementation of the Belt and Road Initiative would help deepen regional economic integration, boost cross-border trade and financial flows between Eurasian countries and the outside world, and further entrench patterns of trade, investment, and infrastructure. The formal start of trade activity at the Gwadar port represents a landmark event in this regard.

In a world driven by various conflicts and hardcore rivalries, China is a voice of sanity that stands for collaborative efforts to negotiate the current set of challenges. The rise of China as the second largest economy and paramount military power is a lesson in how strong leadership commitment and clarity of purpose backed by amazing energy of the leadership can work wonders in a short span of a few decades.

The Chinese model of development that focuses on continuous process of internal reform, consolidation of gains, rule of law and peaceful coexistence with neighbors is holistic, containing important lessons for its friends. China has successfully bridged the North-South gap by championing the causes of the developing world at every forum.

In Pakistan, we continue to be inspired by spectacular accomplishments China has made under the leadership of President Xi Jinping and Premier Li Keqiang. The way Beijing has lifted people out of acute poverty by providing them with reasonable standard of living is a practical manifestation of the China Dream, an idea that is changing lives for the better.

As old global order faces threats of extinction, it is satisfying that the new world order with Chinese characteristics of peace and development is there to augment or better still replace it.

The writer is Chief Minister of Punjab Province in Pakistan.
 
Talking about China and globalisation, I've seen a rather unique group of China bashers emerge recently. To be precise, a group of conspiracy theorists that are of the opinion that China spearheading globalisation in place of the declining US is testament to 中国 being part of the Anglo-Zionist network/NWO. In my book, one fundamental flaw in this assumption is the fact they are conflating the Chinese definition of globalisation with its Anglo-Zionist counterpart.

In China's version, agreements are made with virtually every country on this planet on both an economic and political level to enhance trust and the standard of living in the countries China is cooperating with. This provides China with a larger pool of customers for its products given the fact that the US-led West won't be able to satisfy the demands of said countries for much longer.

What the Anglo-Zionists understand under globalisation is the exact opposite, i.e. to subjugate other nations using either economic, political or military force, thus essentially paving the way for a world run by a small number of (mostly US) elites.


These are my thoughts in a nutshell as I do not have the time at the moment to elaborate these further. What is your view, @TaiShang and @Shotgunner51?
 
Last edited:
Talking about China and globalism, I've seen a rather unique group of China bashers emerge recently. To be precise, a group of conspiracy theorists that are of the opinion that China spearheading globalism in place of the declining US is testament to 中国 being part of the Anglo-Zionist network/NWO. In my book, one fundamental flaw in this assumption is the fact they are conflating the Chinese definition of globalism with its Anglo-Zionist counterpart.

In China's version, agreements are made with virtually every country on this planet on both an economic and political level to enhance trust and the standard of living in the countries China is cooperating with. This provides China with a larger pool of customers for its products given the fact that the US-led West won't be able to satisfy the demands of said countries for much longer.

What the Anglo-Zionists understand under globalism is the exact opposite, i.e. to subjugate other nations using either economic, political or military force, thus essentially paving the way for a world run by a small number of (mostly US) elites.

Just some quick and random thoughts, sorry they're a bit messy, let's continue when free!


These are my thoughts in a nutshell as I do not have the time at the moment to elaborate these further. What is your view, @TaiShang and @Shotgunner51?


Hey long time no see!

If there is any Anglo-Zionist network, talks of China being part of it is just utter bull crap, let's not forget China is run by communists who emerge from grassroots, who were ideologically anti-capitalist only one to two generations ago. Moreover, there isn't even any slightest cultural, language, family or whatever historic links between the two groups. In Japan there are Keiretsu, in South Korea there are Chaebol, in China if there's anything similar, then it could only be the communist party.

On globalism, it's nothing mysterious, in plain language it just means doing business wherever possible, peacefully. Han dynasty did that by horses, Ming Dynasty did that by ships, nowadays we do that with container vessels and cargo planes, for millennium it's always basic human instinct to profit. But there was a violent version once upon a time, it's called colonialism, an European model. Back to present days, we do business just like centuries ago, the key difference is that now there is an "universal" currency (credits) that every sellers accept as payment, some weird things do happen say its value seems infinite large, but as mentioned above, China is not part of whatever gang that creates it, it's an entirely American-driven thing.

When we sell something, naturally we want to get paid. In fact getting paid is the ultimate objective, selling is just a mean, don't mix things up. When one market is already seriously indebted, and still constantly writing new IOU as payment, what to do? Move on, look for new markets in every possible place on this globe. In that sense, yes, of course China must embrace globalism.

Just some random thoughts not well organized, let's continue when free!
 
Last edited:
Globalization sucks for countries that are not competitive.

When you're not competitive, you prefer not to compete. Down that road lies communist-style stagnation.

China right now is the competitive communist, while those anti-globalization armies are mainly right-wing fascists.
 
Was it not the Americans who kicked the door open at Japan's gate demanding for globalization? Now America under Trump wants protectionism, locked inside a house. America first, America first .... :rolleyes: It appears Trump wants to copy feudal Japan's imprisonment policy now or perhaps the Great Wall of China if the wall is ever gonna come separating US and Mexico :lol:
 
what of any impact to the american major direct-sale, multi-level, networking marketing companies ?
 
If I were the US, I would be concerned the most if China really began to act just as the US acted before.

During the early oil discovery period in the Middle East, the US utilized every diplomacy instruments, including military, to protect and promote their oil companies.

The US also used tariff and non-tariff barriers very aggressively to protect home industries. Some even argue that the US grew stronger because of trade barriers.

But, they have kept accusing China for its efforts to protect nascent domestic industries through some government support and protection.

They have kept accusing China for putting trade barriers although China is the second largest importer in the world.

I just hope (and anticipate) that China won't make an ideology out of globalization or free market concepts into which it would trap itself. Rather, China needs to pragmatically utilize these theories and offer as much inclusive and common opportunities as possible to ensure comprehensive development.

https://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/truth-about-trade-history

The thing is US is keen on spreading its ideology as the champion of human rights and democracy, along with artificially keeping the value of the dollar afloat to sustain its treasury, while China is only interested in securing trade routes and markets for its manufactured goods exports and raw materials imports with no desire/interest to spread it's political ideas globally.
 
Last edited:
Hey long time no see!

If there is any Anglo-Zionist network, talks of China being part of it is just utter bull crap, let's not forget China is run by communists who emerge from grassroots, who were ideologically anti-capitalist only one to two generations ago. Moreover, there isn't even any slightest cultural, language, family or whatever historic links between the two groups. In Japan there are Keiretsu, in South Korea there are Chaebol, in China if there's anything similar, then it could only be the communist party.

On globalism, it's nothing mysterious, in plain language it just means doing business wherever possible, peacefully. Han dynasty did that by horses, Ming Dynasty did that by ships, nowadays we do that with container vessels and cargo planes, for millennium it's always basic human instinct to profit. But there was a violent version once upon a time, it's called colonialism, an European model. Back to present days, we do business just like centuries ago, the key difference is that now there is an "universal" currency (credits) that every sellers accept as payment, some weird things do happen say its value seems infinite large, but as mentioned above, China is not part of whatever gang that creates it, it's an entirely American-driven thing.

When we sell something, naturally we want to get paid. In fact getting paid is the ultimate objective, selling is just a mean, don't mix things up. When one market is already seriously indebted, and still constantly writing new IOU as payment, what to do? Move on, look for new markets in every possible place on this globe. In that sense, yes, of course China must embrace globalism.

Just some random thoughts not well organized, let's continue when free!
Well put bro. Westerners thinking always about the 0 sum game. Never about win-win. Anglo elites or NWO gang will never allow China to be part of their group with the same status. In fact I would say China and Russia to an extent is ruining their NWO objectives to control the world's resources.
 
Well put bro. Westerners thinking always about the 0 sum game. Never about win-win. Anglo elites or NWO gang will never allow China to be part of their group with the same status. In fact I would say China and Russia to an extent is ruining their NWO objectives to control the world's resources.

More like they are just shooting themselves in the foot with Brexit and Trump.
 
Hey long time no see!

If there is any Anglo-Zionist network, talks of China being part of it is just utter bull crap, let's not forget China is run by communists who emerge from grassroots, who were ideologically anti-capitalist only one to two generations ago. Moreover, there isn't even any slightest cultural, language, family or whatever historic links between the two groups. In Japan there are Keiretsu, in South Korea there are Chaebol, in China if there's anything similar, then it could only be the communist party.

On globalism, it's nothing mysterious, in plain language it just means doing business wherever possible, peacefully. Han dynasty did that by horses, Ming Dynasty did that by ships, nowadays we do that with container vessels and cargo planes, for millennium it's always basic human instinct to profit. But there was a violent version once upon a time, it's called colonialism, an European model. Back to present days, we do business just like centuries ago, the key difference is that now there is an "universal" currency (credits) that every sellers accept as payment, some weird things do happen say its value seems infinite large, but as mentioned above, China is not part of whatever gang that creates it, it's an entirely American-driven thing.

When we sell something, naturally we want to get paid. In fact getting paid is the ultimate objective, selling is just a mean, don't mix things up. When one market is already seriously indebted, and still constantly writing new IOU as payment, what to do? Move on, look for new markets in every possible place on this globe. In that sense, yes, of course China must embrace globalism.

Just some random thoughts not well organized, let's continue when free!

Thanks for your sentiment. I actually meant globalisation, not globalism, apologies for confusing these two terms.

Whilst @TaiShang calls the US a neo-fascist regime which is spreading chaos all over the globe, I am using the term AngloZionist (courtesy to a blogger called The Saker) which I think is a more accurate term to describe the current world order we live in. In other words, I am not blaming a state per se for the destruction in e. g. Syria and Ukraine and the spread of anti-Russia and anti-China propaganda, but rather a network of individuals and groups, which includes Soros, the Zionist lobby, neocon thinktanks, the US MIC, MNCs, hostile NGOs, US secret services etc.

@TaiShang should be well-versed in that topic.
 
Talking about China and globalisation, I've seen a rather unique group of China bashers emerge recently. To be precise, a group of conspiracy theorists that are of the opinion that China spearheading globalisation in place of the declining US is testament to 中国 being part of the Anglo-Zionist network/NWO. In my book, one fundamental flaw in this assumption is the fact they are conflating the Chinese definition of globalisation with its Anglo-Zionist counterpart.

In China's version, agreements are made with virtually every country on this planet on both an economic and political level to enhance trust and the standard of living in the countries China is cooperating with. This provides China with a larger pool of customers for its products given the fact that the US-led West won't be able to satisfy the demands of said countries for much longer.

What the Anglo-Zionists understand under globalisation is the exact opposite, i.e. to subjugate other nations using either economic, political or military force, thus essentially paving the way for a world run by a small number of (mostly US) elites.

These are my thoughts in a nutshell as I do not have the time at the moment to elaborate these further. What is your view, @TaiShang and @Shotgunner51?


I like to distinguish Globalization process from Zionist (or Anglo-Zionist) ideology (if any); because, in my view, the former is a more comprehensive concept than the latter. What is smaller cannot contain what is larger unless the larger unit is made fragmented or squeezed into a more compact size.

I understand that globalization is a process that emerges from the very nature of the place we humankind share: It is a round, connected space, a globe, hence, human being has the potential opportunity to make contacts. We may talk about a speeding up of globalization as transportation and communication channels are improved and became available to the mass. However, I think we cannot think of globalization as a project that is entirely under the control of one specific entity. In my view, the potential for globalization has existed from the time immemorial; human activity has triggered it and gave it a certain shape and feel. Every social unit has contributed to it.

As @Shotgunner51 points out, globalization emerged in different forms: It once was the Silk Road extending from the eastern coasts of the Middle Kingdom to today's Afghanistan and all the way to the Middle East and North Africa. As has been argued, for most of its part, China's ancient globalization was one of a "long peace." Peace, especially for the space we now call the Confucius sphere. Later, it took another, more militarist form, which now we call Colonialism. Then, it evolved into imperialism, that is colonialism without direct land management. Interestingly, for each manifestation of globalization, the underlying rationale was economics. China did trade. Britain, France and US waged the Opium Wars because Britain had trade deficit and opium was the only commodity they could sell. US and others wanted ports and trade concessions. Eventually, under imperialism, US waged wars for control over currency and resources.

The emerging globalization is just another manifestation of the same phenomenon. It is led by China and is being constructed economically as we speak. With economic fundamentals are more or less set up (China's manufacturing and logistics prowess, trade penetration etc.), then ideas emerges from material reality. Think of ideas such as new form of major power relations, non-interventionism, etc. Then, China has also begun to set up institutions to put these ideas into practice to test their viability and ensure commonality. If we look at previous globalizations, we will see that those also had the material basis, ideas, and institutions.

This is why China-led emerging globalization is very real. Established powers probably see and understand this. Hence, the emergence of multiple hostile forces to stop globalization to transform itself under China's leadership. The hostile forces may utilize ideologies to disturb emerging trends, especially if they see that materially (militarily) they are disempowered. Commodore Perry cannot pay a visit to the Port of Shanghai.

Military option being closed off, they, once, utilized democracy and human rights as a weapon for submission. The plan largely failed, and, recently, the shortcomings of Western propagated models have become more obvious not only in the target regions, but in the West itself, as well.

It appears that anti-China forces also like to utilize higher conspiracies, those that gain currency, especially among underdeveloped cultures and economies in which people are susceptible to grand ideas with strong religious tone, to harm China-led globalization. Anglo-Zionist argument may be one of them. In my view, Zionism by itself is no different from politicized Christendom or Islamic Khalifa ideology. Admittedly, each use different means (war, finance, terrorism); some disappeared pretty much and some are still alive, and also some seem to be emerging. In my view, Zionism is the one that has been kept alive and sponsored mostly through finance and culture.

Nonetheless, it is rather far-fetched to argue that China has become an extension of this Anglo-Zionist global governance (if we assumed there is such a thing. I tend to ignore such arguments laden with strong religiosity and dark sciences like Kabbalah). China is a rather distinct and separate civilization from the theories emerged in the Middle East. China's cultural and political realms are much less penetrable due to distinct racial and linguistic characteristics, which renders it one of the distinct civilization ecosystems. If Greater China moved to another (smaller) planet, It would form a complete model by itself.

That's why I am confident about China-led globalization and I do not see it being part of the Anglo-Zionist network, or NWO. Globalization being a continuity, it is impossible not to carry on certain older aspects, but, in the end, it has to be globalization with Chinese characteristics. For me, the threat is neo-fascism in which elite (business) interests become state interest and the state powers are used to further elite domination. I see the US government being arrested by such elite conspiracy. There may be Zionist elements in it; but, at the end of the day, it is the material that guides actions.

What, then, the thinking people may need to do is to deconstruct the material basis in history and reconstruct it in a different shape by using right and fair policies. It is a mixture of realism and idealism; definitely not altruism. That's why I argued in my previous post on this thread that China should not be arrested by altruistic political correctness and over-ideologizing of globalization process.

China needs to always keep in view the material basis inherent in history making and historical process.
 
Many thanks for your write-up, @TaiShang. In my view, this group of conspiracy theorists I was talking about are particularly of relevance when you regard them against the backdrop of the rise of Donald Trump, who seeks rapprochement with Russia but at the same time is intent on playing hardball with regards to China-US relations, and the rise of patriotic movements all over Europe. Whilst they are critical of political correctness and Killary (which I agree) and some of whom view Russia, not the US, as their natural partner, they do not view China in a favourable light. I cannot exactly explain why but I have a gut feeling these rabid ideologues will be much more dangerous than the laughable likes of Gordon Chang you all are too familiar with from Western MSM ("Ziomedia" in The Saker's parlance).

Anyone remember Alex Jones, by the way?
 
Back
Top Bottom