What's new

The Great Game Changer: Belt and Road Intiative (BRI; OBOR)

China to build international road transport system by 2020
Xinhua, December 6, 2016

China will build an open, modern and efficient international road system by 2020 to facilitate international transport and strengthen connectivity among countries along the Belt and Road.

China will advance transport infrastructure construction along the Belt and Road, improve customs clearance efficiency and strengthen emergency rescue capabilities to facilitate international transport, according to a circular jointly released by eight central departments.

The move is aimed to develop economic corridors with countries along the Belt and Road, reduce cross-border transport costs and improve transport services and efficiency, said Wang Shuiping, a senior official of the Ministry of Transport, during a press conference Tuesday.

Proposed by China in 2013, the Belt and Road is an infrastructure and trade network aiming to connect Asia with Europe and Africa along ancient trade routes.

Regions along the Belt and Road account for 63 percent of the global population and 29 percent of the global economy, statistics show.
 
The Yuxinou (Chongqing) freight rail plan. Start in Xinjiang province of China, crossing Kazakhstan, Russia, Belarus, Poland, and finally reaching Duisburg in Germany.

Interesting how China opts for the northern route to link up with Europe overland. Eurasia is big and there are many options to set up links with Europe. The big winners currently are Central Asia, Russia and Eastern Europe.

As time passes by a and the lines get mature, there will less and less opportunity for the left-out countries to position themselves in one of the spokes that China casts across Eurasia.

1477363040242_cWesternChinaBnR4-p4_476745.jpg


More interesting is the booming (literally, booming) freight train service. New steel and fire Eurasia created by China is up and running.

1477362442575_eWesternChinaBnR4-c1_476745.jpg
 
China to build modern international road transport system by 2020
Source: Xinhua 2016-12-06 18:17:41

BEIJING, Dec. 6 (Xinhua) -- China will build an open, modern and efficient international road system by 2020 to facilitate international transport and strengthen connectivity among countries along the Belt and Road.

China will advance transport infrastructure construction along the Belt and Road, improve customs clearance efficiency and strengthen emergency rescue capabilities to facilitate international transport, according to a circular jointly released by eight central departments.

The move is aimed to develop economic corridors with countries along the Belt and Road, reduce cross-border transport costs and improve transport services and efficiency, said Wang Shuiping, a senior official of the Ministry of Transport, during a press conference Tuesday.

Proposed by China in 2013, the Belt and Road is an infrastructure and trade network aiming to connect Asia with Europe and Africa along ancient trade routes.

Regions along the Belt and Road account for 63 percent of the global population and 29 percent of the global economy, statistics show.
 
There comes the soft power aspect (extension) of hard power

***


China to establish Confucius Institutes in all countries along Belt and Road route
(People's Daily Online) December 12, 2016

FOREIGN201612121511000105613530467.jpg


[File photo]

China has plans to establish Confucius Institutes in all the countries along the Belt and Road route, in an effort to promote Chinese language and culture. This will benefit both China and the Belt and Road nations, according to Hao Ping, vice minister of the Ministry of Education.

At a conference held in Kunming, Yunnan province on Nov. 11, Hao stated that 51 countries along the Belt and Road route have already established 134 Confucius Institutes and 127 Confucius Classrooms, while 460,000 students have registered to study Chinese and Chinese culture in 2016.

In 2017, China plans to establish Confucius Institutes in another nine countries, achieving the goal of covering all Belt and Road countries, Hao added.

“Confucius Institutes should play a more important role in the construction of the Belt and Road. China should attach importance to the training of professional teachers, as well as to targeted course content,” Zhu Chongshi, headmaster of Xiamen University, said during the conference.

Confucius Institutes are named after the ancient Chinese philosopher Confucius. They serve as non-profit public institutions aimed to help foreigners understand China by studying the language and culture at universities overseas. The first such institute was established in 2004.

A total of 2.1 million people are currently studying Chinese language and culture in 511 Confucius Institutes and 1,073 Confucius Classrooms across 140 countries and regions, the Xinhua News Agency reported.
 
China expects progress in China-Thailand railway
China.org.cn

China pledged on Monday to work with Thailand on the joint railway project for the benefit of both countries and peoples.

b8aeed990a5819b97b5001.jpg
Chinese Premier Li Keqiang (R) meets with Thailand's First Deputy Prime Minister and Defense Minister Prawit Wongsuwan in Beijing, capital of China, Dec. 12, 2016. [Photo/Xinhua]



Premier Li Keqiang made the remarks when met with First Deputy Prime Minister and Defense Minister Prawit Wongsuwan of Thailand.

Thai Deputy Prime Minister Somkid Jatusripitak, who was here to attend the 5th China-Thailand Joint Committee on Trade, Investment and Economic Cooperation Meeting held on Friday in Beijing, was also present at the meeting on Monday.

Li said he and Thai Prime Minister Prayuth Chan-ocha reached consensus on the railway earlier this year.

The memorandum signed on Friday made clear arrangements for the next step on the basis of the current cooperation framework, said Li.

Prawit told Li he is visiting to inform China about recent developments on behalf of Prayuth.

He said Thailand is ready to work with China on major connectivity projects including the railway and strengthen cooperation on tourism, internet, agriculture and law enforcement.

Thailand and China signed documents on the development of Thailand's transportation infrastructure in 2014.

On the regional cooperation, Li said it is the consensus of all sides to enhance the economic integration of the East Asia, especially to agree upon the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) at an early date.

It is in line with all parties' interests, conducive to showing the willingness of countries in the region to promote trade and investment liberalization and facilitation, he said.

China supports the Association of the South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) in playing a core role in the regional cooperation and would like to enhance communication and contacts with parties including Thailand on the negotiation of RCEP under the framework of China-ASEAN ties and East Asia cooperation, Li said.

Prawit said the RCEP is an important proposal that will benefit Asia.

As an ASEAN member, Thailand will play an active role in the RCEP negotiation process.
 
Inside China’s Global Spending Spree
By Scott Cendrowski
Photograph by Teru Onishi for Fortune
December 12, 2016, 6:30 AM EST



The high-rise coastal city of Dubai plays host to all kinds of luxury oddities: indoor ski slopes, gold-bar vending machines, vast artificial archipelagoes shaped like palm trees. But six miles inland, something just as unusual, if far less gaudy, is taking shape—the first coal-fired power plant in the Middle East.

The United Arab Emirates, to which Dubai belongs, need to diversify their energy mix. By 2030, Dubai hopes to balance natural gas and solar and get 7% of its energy from coal. Its first step: a massive “clean coal” project. Workers broke ground in early November for a plant expected to be finished in 2023.

In this petroleum-dominated region, there isn’t much coal-power expertise. But that won’t be a problem for Dubai, thanks to help from unusual sources. The nearly $2 billion project is backed by $1.4 billion in funding from the Chinese government and banks and is being built by Chinese construction crews.

Why such largesse for an emirate swimming in oil wealth? Because Dubai is one of the nations China is targeting as part of One Belt, One Road, an ambitious foreign-investment project designed to boost China’s trade and diplomatic ties with more than 60 countries in the Middle East, Europe, and Africa. China is opening up its checkbook for this group of potential allies: It’s committing $1 trillion through the program in the next decade—and as much as $3 trillion over the long term—to huge infrastructure investments, in locations that stretch from China’s coast through the deserts of Xinjiang province and the steppes of Central Asia as far west as Spain and Scandinavia.

Untitled.png


Already, nearly $900 billion worth of projects are underway or planned, according to the China Development Bank, and the first ones are almost finished. A $2.1 billion thermal-power plant in Karachi should be completed by the end of next year, just 40 months after construction started.

One Belt, One Road represents China’s biggest overseas spending effort ever, a project that, adjusted for inflation, is at least 12 times the size of the Marshall Plan, the history-changing U.S. program that helped rebuild Western Europe from rubble after World War II. The effort is already seeding power plants, railroads, and pipelines in emerging-market countries starving for such backbone investments.

Just as with the Marshall Plan, there’s far more than altruism in play. China’s huge state-owned infrastructure companies, hampered by their own country’s gradual slowdown, need projects that will keep their foundries blazing and their workers paid while the nation makes the transition to a less industrial, more consumer-driven economy. And Belt and Road (as China’s government has rebranded it) helps China earn diplomatic goodwill at a time when the U.S. and Europe appear less willing to invest in economy-building abroad.

The New Silk Road

Belt and Road has a historical precedent: the ancient Silk Road that for hundreds of years connected Chinese traders with those in the Middle East and Europe via the Eurasian steppes, Palestine, and Turkey. In an era of wagon caravans and sailing ships, those trading ties did little to extend a then-insular China’s geopolitical clout. But Belt and Road is intended to forge far more binding ties today.

The program, which was formally announced in 2013, is the brainchild of Chinese President Xi Jinping. Xi has already amassed power in military and economic affairs faster than any other modern Chinese leader, says Willy Lam, an expert on Chinese politics and a professor at the Chinese University of Hong Kong. Expanding China’s influence abroad is Xi’s next priority, and Belt and Road is designed to do just that. “It projects Chinese hard and soft power to places as far as East Africa,” says Lam, “and it bonds China with countries … that may otherwise continue to remain dependent on the U.S.”

Joe Ngai, managing partner of McKinsey’s Hong Kong practice, says the need for infrastructure in emerging markets in central and southern Asia and into Africa amounts to $2 trillion to $3 trillion a year. The Belt is the land-based component of Xi’s strategy to meet that demand. It’s a network of railroads, oil pipelines, and other projects that runs northwest from China through Kazakhstan and Russia. The Belt hits multiple Asian countries before turning west through Belarus and Poland into Europe—where it’s bringing investment to countries where post-financial-crisis austerity has crimped infrastructure spending.

The Road (somewhat confusingly) is a maritime route of investments to improve ports along shipping lanes, extending from southern China to Indonesia and west to Africa, the Middle East, and southern Europe. Many of those areas have already attracted intensive Chinese investment in the past decade, and some experts say that “Belt and Road” is merely a slick label added to existing Chinese policy. But the money promised to the new project is anything but superficial.

The famed Silk Road trading routes once connected China with medieval Europe. Today, the One Belt, One Road initiative is strengthening China’s ties to countries along the same routes—and the economic and geopolitical stakes are far higher. According to the Mercator Institute, the 65 countries that could eventually be connected by Belt and Road account for around 30% of the global economy. About $900 billion worth of projects are now either underway or in detailed planning stages, according to the China Development Bank; this map highlights some of the signature projects.

OBOR.png

(High-resolution map, click to enlarge)​

The Decision Makers

Chinese spending abroad for Belt and Road is expected to reach $100 billion annually over the next decade, and China has earmarked as much as $3 trillion for it. The money comes from Chinese-backed development banks, China’s state-owned enterprises, and even local Chinese governments. The funding process is convoluted, but one leading player is the recently formed Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), China’s answer to the World Bank; AIIB is starting with $100 billion to lend. China will be responsible for one-third to one-half of the bank’s financing, but its members include almost 60 other countries.

AIIB’s board is searching for worthwhile endeavors—and so is China’s domestic bureaucracy. “Provinces and cities have been assigned Belt-and-Road quotas [by the central government], and are busy sending delegations abroad to find projects,” Arthur Kroeber of the Hong Kong-based research firm Gavekal Dragonomics wrote recently.

It is essentially up to Xi’s administration to choose the projects. China’s central government decides the countries it wants to work with, and those countries nominate projects for funding. China’s selections reflect both commercial and political interests, analysts say. If the host country is important for political reasons, China may be willing to take losses on construction; if not, China is more likely to invest in collaborations that could eventually offer a positive return. Belt and Road’s political elements were evident in late October when brash Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte, who has disparaged both President Obama and Pope Francis in his bid to push the Philippines away from old alliances, visited China to get in Xi’s good graces. Duterte’s delegation came away with $24 billion worth of funding and pledges for ports, mines, and railways.

The Money Trail

Some Belt and Road projects are already underway.
  • A $23 billion high-speed rail line could someday stretch from China through Thailand to Singapore.
  • In southern Pakistan along the Arabian Sea, two large coal-fired power plants are going up.
  • A gas pipeline running from Russia to China through Siberia is under construction, with a price tag of more than $55 billion.
  • In Europe there’s a massive Czech Republic canal project linking river basins from Poland to Slovakia and Austria that China and the Czechs are each funding with $1 billion investments.
Of the $100 billion a year spent on Belt and Road, about 50% will be used for raw materials like concrete and steel, according to Strategy&, the consulting arm of PwC. For China that’s essentially domestic stimulus: Top Chinese officials have noted that Belt and Road projects can soak up excess steel and iron from Chinese companies hurt by the waning of their nation’s building frenzy.

Another 30% to 40% of total spending will go toward construction, engineering, and high-tech equipment. Those phases will be led by Chinese engineering construction contractors (EPCs), which have a lock on winning the lead business from China’s lenders. China’s goal is eventually to attract private investors in projects that are economically viable. Qatar’s sovereign wealth fund, for instance, took a 49% stake in a Pakistan power plant project, while the Chinese builder Power Construction took the other 51%.

Read the full story at http://fortune.com/china-belt-road-investment/
 
Another 30% to 40% of total spending will go toward construction, engineering, and high-tech equipment.

It is important that the equipment is provided/sourced by China's own machinery makers. This way, China will have its own Cat, Hyundai, and Hitachi.

The Belt is the land-based component of Xi’s strategy to meet that demand. It’s a network of railroads, oil pipelines, and other projects that runs northwest from China through Kazakhstan and Russia. The Belt hits multiple Asian countries before turning west through Belarus and Poland into Europe—where it’s bringing investment to countries where post-financial-crisis austerity has crimped infrastructure spending.

That's a very realistic description of the Belt as it is today.

A gas pipeline running from Russia to China through Siberia is under construction, with a price tag of more than $55 billion.

This will become online in 2018. The 400billion USD deal is for a 30 year supply, which will make Russia China's largest natural gas provider -- after crude oil.
 
It is important that the equipment is provided/sourced by China's own machinery makers. This way, China will have its own Cat, Hyundai, and Hitachi.

That's a very realistic description of the Belt as it is today.

This will become online in 2018. The 400billion USD deal is for a 30 year supply, which will make Russia China's largest natural gas provider -- after crude oil.


Yes! Also take note of the map, one of the most comprehensive about OBOR I've seen, covering as far as Walvis Bay. It's quite high res 2349 x 1419, you may click to enlarge.

obor-png.360276


Pipelines, rail, seaports, power/data grids are major OBOR connectivity projects, expect to see lots of greenfield investment in Eurasian landmass, Africa and ASEAN.
 
https://timesofislamabad.com/russia...rridor-project-russian-ambassador/2016/12/17/
Russia supports China-Pakistan Economic Corridor project: Russian Ambassador
Posted By:News Deskon:December 17, 2016
Russian-Ambassador-Pak.jpg


ISLAMABAD (APP): Russian Ambassador to Pakistan Alexey Y. Dedov has said that Russia has strongly support China- Pakistan Economic Corridor project as it is crucial for Pakistan’s economy and regional connectivity.

Pakistan Russia getting closer on all important issues: Russian Ambassador

In an exclusive interview with Radio Pakistan, he pointed out that CPEC is component of China’s Silk Road and his country was also working on a similar Eurasian Economic Union and China and Russia are holding discussions to merge the two projects.

Asked about North-South gas pipeline project of Pakistan Government, the Russian Ambassador said they are eager to realize the project at the soonest.

The Ambassador said the two countries are closely cooperating in different areas but there is need to enhance the volume of bilateral trade.

About MI-35 gunship helicopter deal between the two countries, he said the contract has already been signed and it is now for the officials concerned to define a timeframe for the purpose.

Pakistan-Russia-China to meet in Moscow over Afghanistan

Replying to a question, the Russian Ambassador said his country wants Pakistan and India to resolve all issues including Jammu and Kashmir through peaceful means.

He said Pakistan and Russia are also closely cooperating in efforts for restoration of peace in Afghanistan.
 
Time for Europe to better position Belt & Road
By Chen Chenchen | Source:Global Times | Published: 2016/12/18 19:08:39

0a8cb1c5-de02-4a7a-9955-843d7dc9ea90.jpeg

Illustration: Peter C. Espina/GT


"The Belt and Road Initiative (B&R initiative) is not discussed on TV here," a Zurich-based economist from a top local university said to me during a recent conversation we had in his office. "Not many people here are informed about the initiative. I read a couple of articles in newspaper, but I'm not so familiar."

It was one typical answer I heard during a recent trip to Switzerland. My colleague and I paid visits to several top Swiss think tanks, and we also had discussions with finance professionals from Zurich. It didn't take long before we came to the intuitive fact that many elite Europeans from academia and business lack basic understanding of the B&R initiative.

This quick observation is in accordance with research findings back in China on European attitudes toward it. According to the Center for European Union Studies at Shanghai International Studies University, while the EU's top decision-makers have made increasingly clear and positive responses to the B&R initiative, studies and analyses from European think tanks and business interest groups are still weak.

One immediate explanation is that since the initiative is in the early stages of implementation, many Europeans haven't yet seen a direct link to specific projects. I did a mini survey before giving a presentation to a group in Zurich, mainly consisting of senior professionals from local financial giants. Among the three dozen people in the room, only five or six raised their hands to indicate they'd heard of it before they walked in. One investment banker told me later that it was primarily because the initiative wasn't yet something they could directly invest in.

Nonetheless, a more profound reason is probably rooted in the way Europeans deal with the external world. The B&R initiative has been perceived with a mixture of skepticism and interest, partly due to problems in mutual strategic distrust between Europe and China. One of the widely held European views is that projects linked to the B&R initiative would mean exploitation of resources in areas between China and Europe, and that the Chinese would leave a "quasi-colonial legacy" behind.

A global vision of inter-connectivity, based on pluralism and equal collaboration, is instinctively ruled out by many elite Europeans. Traditional theories of geopolitical rivalry, which date back to the age of imperialism, somehow permeate in the European perception of the initiative. Some see the initiative as a Chinese way of geo-economic expansion aimed at reshaping Eurasian political, economic and security order. This old-fashioned mentality may mean passivity in dealing with Chinese investments.

Europe does have interest in it, but it is simply impossible to reap quick benefits from it without spending time to properly position it, and to find concrete ways to bridge it with Europe's own development frameworks, including the European Fund for Strategic Investment and Trans-European Transport Networks. In this sense, European business people engaging in trade and foreign investment as well as think tanks focusing on foreign policy studies and consulting could do more.

Both China and the EU have raised ambitious cooperation goals in various fields, including energy, urbanization, intellectual property rights protection, as well as aviation and aerospace. EU-China ties could advance by leaps and bounds if cooperation plans are brought to implementation.

From the Chinese perspective, two gaps are prominent at the moment. One is between Chinese and European positioning of the B&R initiative. It has literally become China's No.1 project for both domestic development and external interaction, and some top Chinese scholars envisage the concept initiating the nation's third round of reform and opening-up. This is in sharp contrast with skepticism among some Europeans toward the so-called period of validity of the initiative.

The other gap is evident when one roughly compares studies on the initiative by think tanks in Europe and the US. In Washington, systematic studies, including tracking of specific projects in terms of their profitability, have been under way. In Europe, there are certainly solid studies, but generally speaking, detailed and systematic perceptions of the initiative are inadequate.

In the Chinese leadership's top-level design, "market-oriented" is listed as one of its principles. This means that mobilizing the private sector and social vigor is indispensable following government-to-government coordination. Local and industrial participation is key to building up inter-connectivity between the two ends of the vast Eurasian landmass.

In order to bring this into reality, Europeans need to first understand the B&R initiative in a more detailed way, rather than being led by a stereotyped view on Chinese intentions. In this process, European think tanks and business interest groups have important roles to play.

The author is a research fellow with Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies at the Renmin University of China.chenchenchen@ruc.edu.cn


********

China needs to do more PR work regarding B&R in Europe.
.
 
Time for Europe to better position Belt & Road
By Chen Chenchen | Source:Global Times | Published: 2016/12/18 19:08:39

0a8cb1c5-de02-4a7a-9955-843d7dc9ea90.jpeg

Illustration: Peter C. Espina/GT


"The Belt and Road Initiative (B&R initiative) is not discussed on TV here," a Zurich-based economist from a top local university said to me during a recent conversation we had in his office. "Not many people here are informed about the initiative. I read a couple of articles in newspaper, but I'm not so familiar."

It was one typical answer I heard during a recent trip to Switzerland. My colleague and I paid visits to several top Swiss think tanks, and we also had discussions with finance professionals from Zurich. It didn't take long before we came to the intuitive fact that many elite Europeans from academia and business lack basic understanding of the B&R initiative.

This quick observation is in accordance with research findings back in China on European attitudes toward it. According to the Center for European Union Studies at Shanghai International Studies University, while the EU's top decision-makers have made increasingly clear and positive responses to the B&R initiative, studies and analyses from European think tanks and business interest groups are still weak.

One immediate explanation is that since the initiative is in the early stages of implementation, many Europeans haven't yet seen a direct link to specific projects. I did a mini survey before giving a presentation to a group in Zurich, mainly consisting of senior professionals from local financial giants. Among the three dozen people in the room, only five or six raised their hands to indicate they'd heard of it before they walked in. One investment banker told me later that it was primarily because the initiative wasn't yet something they could directly invest in.

Nonetheless, a more profound reason is probably rooted in the way Europeans deal with the external world. The B&R initiative has been perceived with a mixture of skepticism and interest, partly due to problems in mutual strategic distrust between Europe and China. One of the widely held European views is that projects linked to the B&R initiative would mean exploitation of resources in areas between China and Europe, and that the Chinese would leave a "quasi-colonial legacy" behind.

A global vision of inter-connectivity, based on pluralism and equal collaboration, is instinctively ruled out by many elite Europeans. Traditional theories of geopolitical rivalry, which date back to the age of imperialism, somehow permeate in the European perception of the initiative. Some see the initiative as a Chinese way of geo-economic expansion aimed at reshaping Eurasian political, economic and security order. This old-fashioned mentality may mean passivity in dealing with Chinese investments.

Europe does have interest in it, but it is simply impossible to reap quick benefits from it without spending time to properly position it, and to find concrete ways to bridge it with Europe's own development frameworks, including the European Fund for Strategic Investment and Trans-European Transport Networks. In this sense, European business people engaging in trade and foreign investment as well as think tanks focusing on foreign policy studies and consulting could do more.

Both China and the EU have raised ambitious cooperation goals in various fields, including energy, urbanization, intellectual property rights protection, as well as aviation and aerospace. EU-China ties could advance by leaps and bounds if cooperation plans are brought to implementation.

From the Chinese perspective, two gaps are prominent at the moment. One is between Chinese and European positioning of the B&R initiative. It has literally become China's No.1 project for both domestic development and external interaction, and some top Chinese scholars envisage the concept initiating the nation's third round of reform and opening-up. This is in sharp contrast with skepticism among some Europeans toward the so-called period of validity of the initiative.

The other gap is evident when one roughly compares studies on the initiative by think tanks in Europe and the US. In Washington, systematic studies, including tracking of specific projects in terms of their profitability, have been under way. In Europe, there are certainly solid studies, but generally speaking, detailed and systematic perceptions of the initiative are inadequate.

In the Chinese leadership's top-level design, "market-oriented" is listed as one of its principles. This means that mobilizing the private sector and social vigor is indispensable following government-to-government coordination. Local and industrial participation is key to building up inter-connectivity between the two ends of the vast Eurasian landmass.

In order to bring this into reality, Europeans need to first understand the B&R initiative in a more detailed way, rather than being led by a stereotyped view on Chinese intentions. In this process, European think tanks and business interest groups have important roles to play.

The author is a research fellow with Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies at the Renmin University of China.chenchenchen@ruc.edu.cn


********

China needs to do more PR work regarding B&R in Europe.
.


One concern the EU has is that the OBOR may have a fragmenting effect on the community building in Europe. They worry that if China negotiates bilaterally with specific EU members, this will weaken EU's overall unified decision making powers.

Maybe EU must establish an office to particularly deal with the OBOR related issues. Because OBOR won't disappear just because the EU pretends it does not exist.

The charm of the initiative is too big for (especially Eastern European countries) to ignore. They will in one way or another join the development bandwagon.

AIIB-EBRD cooperation, in this sense, is a good step to this end.
 
Preventing Islamic risk on ‘Belt and Road’
By Mei Xinyu Source: Global Times Published: 2016/12/15 15:33:39

upload_2016-12-20_15-43-24.png

Illustration: Liu Rui/GT

A few years ago, I predicted that for the next 10 to 20 years, economic recession will worsen and cause major social instability in emerging countries. Africa, Latin America and Middle East Islamic countries will be the prime source of this upheaval and turmoil. For nearly three years, the Ukrainian crisis, the emergence of the Islamic State, the Yemen civil war and 2016 Turkish coup attempt have proved my prediction. In the next 10 to 20 years, "Islamic risk" will be one of the world's biggest political risks.

For China's "One Belt, One Road" (OBOR) initiative, Islamic risk is also a prominent political danger. According to the broadest definition, OBOR involves 64 countries, 33 of which are Muslim countries, accounting for more than half the total.

Among the remaining 31 non-Muslim countries, 10 countries have obvious existing Muslim unrest and are at risk of terror attacks. In total, 44 countries have Islamic risk, making up 69 percent of the total number of countries along OBOR.

For example, Pakistan, China's iron-core brother, is a country with serious Islamic extremism. From 2012 to 2013, violent terrorist incidents in Pakistan caused 11,590 deaths, which included 6,008 civilians, 1,408 policemen and 4,174 militants.

As a country pursuing a policy of non-interference in the internal affairs of other countries, China has no obligations to get them out of the social upheavals. What China can do is to create a favorable environment for their peaceful development through equal trade after they walk out of turbulence. When promoting OBOR, China should fully consider risk returns, and try to maximize returns while minimizing risk.

In view of Islamic risk, China ought to give priority to pre-arrangements, supplemented by measures afterward. Chinese enterprises in Muslim countries should put self-help measures first, while making government guarantees and rescue mechanisms subsidiary. Relying on these tactics means that active arrangements are vital for reducing Islamic risk during the process of perfecting a transnational operation political risk-response system. Only in this way can China minimize the cost of political risks in transnational management.

In addition, the Chinese government should modestly promote overseas aid, and expand policy-oriented export credit insurance and overseas investment insurance. However, expecting the aid to eliminate all political risks is unrealistic, which is beyond the affordability of Chinese national strength and may lead to moral hazard for enterprises.

According to the above principles, China can take measures such as organizing Chinese security companies, and carrying out rescues and intervention when necessary. Nevertheless, what China should do most is as follows.

The probability of political risks should be reduced by appropriately arranging OBOR, moderately relaxing restrictions on media reports, discussing Islamic risk, implementing neutral and friendly policies, and taking appropriate international operations strategies.

Especially, a more open media environment and more discussions about corruption problems, social unrest, rampant violence and other negative issues in Islamic countries can prevent Chinese people from entering dangerous places.

Moreover, it is advised to speed up the organization of overseas Chinese chambers of commerce, so as to strengthen overseas merchants' ability to resist political risks. In addition, China should improve bilateral investment-protection mechanisms and upgrade policy-oriented export credit insurance and foreign investment insurance.

The author is a research fellow at the Chinese Academy of International Trade and Economic Cooperation under the Ministry of Commerce. opinion@globaltimes.com.cn

***

@AndrewJin , @long_ , @cirr , @Shotgunner51
 
Belt and Road Initiative helps promote new mode of globalization: experts
(Xinhua) December 26, 2016


BEIJING, Dec. 26 (Xinhua) -- With the current globalization mode being challenged by rising protectionism, China-proposed Belt and Road Initiative (B&R) provides insight into building a new mode that better suits world development, said Chinese experts here on Monday.

Though the progress of globalization may have been set back by surging isolationism and populist sentiments in the West, its general trend will not change, said scholars on international relations at a forum held by Xinhuanet.com, the website of Xinhua News Agency.

At present, it is impossible for any country to live in a closed system any more, said Wang Yiwei, director of the Center for International Studies at China's Renmin University.

The biggest obstacles to the current globalization mode stem from its institutional defects and its unadaptable governance structure, said Yang Xiyu, a researcher from the China Institute of International Studies.

"The world calls for a new mode of globalization," Yang added.

Launched in 2013, the B&R is perceived as an efficient way for promoting a new mode.

Acknowledging the success of the initiative, experts at the forum also pointed out challenges that may lie ahead.

For countries along the route, possible religious or ethnic conflicts, along with other problems in the legal, financial and environmental areas, may hinder the sound development of the initiative, said Guo Xiangang, a researcher from the China Institute of International Studies.

"China should improve risk assessment, reinforce enterprise-led management and encourage the market to play its role," said Guo.

He also suggested China foster experts in relevant fields and train employees to respect local customs.
 
China-Europe cargo trains support development of Belt and Road initiative

(Xinhua) 14:50, December 29, 2016




Containers are seen at Yiwu West Railway Station in Yiwu, east China's Zhejiang Province, Dec. 28, 2016. The China-Europe container trains have become a major transportation channel of the international logistics industry, and also powerful support for the development of the Belt and Road initiative. (Xinhua/Huang Zongzhi)



Workers unload goods from a China-Europe container train at Yiwu West Railway Station in Yiwu, east China's Zhejiang Province, Dec. 28, 2016. The China-Europe container trains have become a major transportation channel of the international logistics industry, and also powerful support for the development of the Belt and Road initiative. (Xinhua/Huang Zongzhi)



Customers select Spanish goods imported by China-Europe container trains at Yiwu International Trade Mart in Yiwu, east China's Zhejiang Province, Dec. 28, 2016. The China-Europe container trains have become a major transportation channel of the international logistics industry, and also powerful support for the development of the Belt and Road initiative. (Xinhua/Huang Zongzhi)



Trucks carrying Chinese goods unload containers at Yiwu West Railway Station in Yiwu, east China's Zhejiang Province, Dec. 28, 2016. The China-Europe container trains have become a major transportation channel of the international logistics industry, and also powerful support for the development of the Belt and Road initiative. (Xinhua/Huang Zongzhi)

FOREIGN201612291450000048016852179.jpg


Trucks carrying Chinese goods unload containers at Yiwu West Railway Station in Yiwu, east China's Zhejiang Province, Dec. 28, 2016. The China-Europe container trains have become a major transportation channel of the international logistics industry, and also powerful support for the development of the Belt and Road initiative. (Xinhua/Huang Zongzhi)
 
Back
Top Bottom