What's new

The Great Game Changer: Belt and Road Intiative (BRI; OBOR)

China should perhaps develop ballistic missile defence system together with Russia!
Btw, an unconfirmed news in the Chinese miliatry forum says that T-key has approached Chinese gov on the Dec 15th and asked to buy 2 batterries of HQ-9 for immediate delivery. You could guess what China's reponse would be. :undecided:
 
China should perhaps develop ballistic missile defence system together with Russia!
Btw, an unconfirmed news in the Chinese miliatry forum says that T-key has approached Chinese gov on the Dec 15th and asked to buy 2 batterries of HQ-9 for immediate delivery. You could guess what China's reponse would be. :undecided:



not asked but begged, shameless Turkey !

:disagree::disagree::disagree: (China's answer to Turkey)
 
In the wake of the Japan’s Fukushima Daiichi disaster in 2011 many countries decided to reduce, freeze or even drop peaceful atom projects altogether. The Russian Federation and China, however, have no such intentions and continue developing their nuclear power sectors domestically and participating in projects in other countries. From time to time, this results in either cooperation or competition.
After the Fukushima accident, the PRC government rushed to announce that the country’s nuclear power sector will continue to grow following the comprehensive security checks at all nuclear power plants. Dozens of billions of dollars were poured into strengthening the security of the nuclear power plants under construction and those already in operation. China could not say no to the nuclear power, since the nation’s power demand has been steadily increasing, and the traditional coal-powered generation will soon fail to match it. Besides, the PRC is intending to reduce the number of its coal power stations due to the harm they cause to the environment.

At the moment, China has a world lead in expanding nuclear capacity. In 2015, PRC’s nuclear reactors generated 42 mln kWt, and this indicator is expected to double by 2020. A desire to make these plans a reality makes China seek help from Russia.

So, the construction of Tianwan Nuclear Power Plant in the Chinese Jiangsu province on the Yellow sea coast is still in progress. This power station is considered the largest site of Russia-China economic cooperation. The construction commenced in 1999 with two first units put in commercial operation in 2007. Their completion cost $3 billion. The construction project involved more than 150 Russian organisations and companies headed by JSC Atomstroyexport.

It will also be noteworthy to mention the institute Atomenergoproekt, Experimental Design Bureau “Gidropress”, and the Russian Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”. The construction of the second stage of the Tianwan NPS commenced in 2012 after the complete units and the project itself had undergone multiple compliance inspections in the aftermath of the Fukushima accident. The plan is to build eight units in total. The reactors of Tianwan NPS are the enhanced version of VVER-1000 (water-water energetic reactor with nominal electric power of 1000MW). From economic point of view, they are considerably efficient, but their main advantage is that their reinforced emergency protection puts them among the safest reactors in the world allowing them to withstand earthquakes, hurricanes, and other natural disasters.

Needless to say, there is more to Russia-China nuclear cooperation than Tianwan NPS. Russian specialists took part in the development of PRC’s uranium enrichment centres, construction of an experimental reactor in the vicinity of Beijing as well as other projects.

Back in 2013 Russia’s Rosatom received a proposal from the PRC to participate in the joint construction and operation of floating NPSs; moreover, China was willing to take care of a large part of the project finances.

Undoubtedly, Russia-China cooperation in the nuclear power sector has benefitted the both parties and will continue to do so and develop further. Yet, in the years passed since its initiation, China has developed its own nuclear technologies to such an extent that it is ready to export them and challenge Russia’s position on the world market. For instance, in March 2015, Rosatom lost a bid for construction of six NPSs in the SAR to Chinese companies. The tender priced at $93 billion was contested by companies from the USA, France and South Korea.

The main reason why the China National Nuclear Corporation gained the upper hand on such strong competitors is that China let the scientists from the SAR see the research being done there. Willingness of the Chinese company to make significant investments in the SAR economy also took its toll.

In June 2015, China’s Prime Minister Li Keqiang visited one of the major Chinese nuclear power design companies, China Nuclear Power Engineering Co Ltd., in order to witness the testing of the China-made reactor «Hualong One» («Dragon»). In his speech he noted: ‘Today China is considered the world’s number one in high-speed railway development, and now it is time to be the first in nuclear technologies’.

China’s zone of interests, besides the SAR, encompassed the Middle East countries, Argentina and even the Great Britain. Sure enough, South-East Asia has not been deprived of attention either.

The pace of the Chinese expansion is high and the Russian nuclear experts need to put a lot of effort in order to keep pace with competitors for the market segments. Openly competing with China for the Middle East, Russia is simultaneously searching for importers of its technologies in ASEAN states where Chinese influence is strong.

In this respect it is worth mentioning the International Energy Week that took place on October 30, 2015 in Singapore where it has been held annually since 2008. According to the opinion of a Rosatom representative that participated in the event, ASEAN can become one of the main producers of nuclear energy in the world and that will help them meet their own power needs without harming the environment and will noticeably boost the economy. ‘The nuclear sector creates new jobs, supports machine industry and construction, promotes scientific and technical expertise as well as education,” he said. However, before embarking on nuclear projects, ASEAN countries should sort out financial issues. They will need to create a special infrastructure and train specialists. Rosatom already supports its partners in Vietnam in the construction of the Ninh Thuan nuclear power station. And thus, similar type of support can be offered to other ASEAN countries that would wish to develop their own nuclear sector.

It is also important to establish public relationships with the ASEAN countries, which tend to treat nuclear power with scepticism, especially after the Fukushima disaster. In Vietnam, for instance, Rosatom created an information centre to promote awareness of the nuclear technologies. For example, there you can find information about the new Russian reactors, type VVER, that can withstand external impacts including 7-8 magnitude earthquakes. (As was mentioned above, these very reactors will be put in operation at the Vietnam’s Ninh Thuan NPS). Let us remind you that EAEU countries signed an agreement with Vietnam on free trade zone in May 2015. Russia considers this as the first step toward a deeper integration with the whole Asia-Pacific region. It also applies to the nuclear power cooperation. In addition to the Vietnamese plant, Rosatom participates in building of experimental reactor in Indonesia. Mianmar and Thailand expressed their interest in seeking Russia’s participation in developing the nuclear power share in their energy sectors. Yet, these are not all of the ASEAN countries, and Russia has to hurry to get on board of the remaining nuclear power markets before China, its partner and rival, does.

Dmitry Bokarev, political observer, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”.
First appeared: Russia and China in the Nuclear Energy Sector: Cooperation or Competition? | New Eastern Outlook
 
For instance, in March 2015, Rosatom lost a bid for construction of six NPSs in the SAR to Chinese companies. The tender priced at $93 billion was contested by companies from the USA, France and South Korea.

It's a gigantic deal! Contestants include China Guangdong Nuclear Power Holding Corp, Russian state nuclear corporation Rosatom, Toshiba's Westinghouse Electric Corp unit, Korea Electric Power Corp, and France's Areva/EDF.

That's probably why Xi was meeting with Zuma of South Africa so frequently.

China’s zone of interests, besides the SAR, encompassed the Middle East countries, Argentina and even the Great Britain. Sure enough, South-East Asia has not been deprived of attention either.

The market is huge, nuclear energy is fast becoming a key exports business.

China (CGN, CNNC) and Russia (Rosatom) should pool efforts to compete with rival Toshiba-Westinghouse. There are a lot of areas for cooperation from reactor industry, plant operation, uranium industry to waste management.

Let's not forget Kazakhstan, the world's top producer of uranium, is a SCO founding member, strategic partner for Russia-China alliance.
 
Last edited:
On AsiaWind, a member read the Russian-wrote article and noted the nominal per-capita GDP difference between Russia and China.
But the Asian behemoth is nonetheless playing catch-up: per capita GDP in Russia stands at $12,736, while in China it is at $7,594. So, can we say that one country’s model has really been better than the other’s?

The GDP per capita comparison is from 2014.

This year, the Russian Ruble has depreciated from 35 to 70 Rubles per US Dollar.

Thus, the Russian nominal per-capita GDP is one-half of last year's.

The Russian nominal per-capita GDP is closer to $6,000 for the year 2015.

Ev1pKhr.jpg
 
Last edited:
China's model is designed for China's specific circumstances and for our current stage of development.

It's right for China, doesn't mean it is right for other countries.

We've seen how successful it has been when "Western democracy" has been transplanted into developing countries like Iraq, Sudan, Afghanistan, etc.
 
China's model is designed for China's specific circumstances and for our current stage of development.

It's right for China, doesn't mean it is right for other countries.

We've seen how successful it has been when "Western democracy" has been transplanted into developing countries like Iraq, Sudan, Afghanistan, etc.

Exactly. Imposing models on others has always ended up in disaster one way or another. In the final analysis, I wish the Russian people the best with their ongoing fierce fight for national sovereignty and dignity, an occurrence that inspires progressive-minded people.

Hopefully, Russian economy will return to positive territory from next year onward as the Syrian-situation appears to be calming down across the Russia's lines. Then Mr. Putin can look more deeply at the Ukrainian situation.
 
China and Russia should cooperate on nuclear tech. The world market is big enough for both to have their fair share. Russia, in fact, is not sitting its hands tied behind, either (From last month):


Russia to Build 4,800-MW Nuclear Power Plant in Egypt
11/20/2015

1448037644777.jpg


Russia signed a cooperation agreement to build and operate a four-unit, 1,200-MW-each nuclear power plant in Egypt.

The memorandum of understanding between the Russian Federal Service for Environmental, Technological and Nuclear Supervision and the Egyptian regulatory body for nuclear and radiological safety was signed to further develop the nuclear infrastructure.

The two countries signed an agreement on the development of the project that determined the specifications of the plant and key areas of operation in February.
 
China, Russia sign over 30 deals during Medvedev visit


Chinese Premier Li Keqiang (R) and Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev meet the press after the 20th China-Russia Prime Ministers' Regular Meeting in Beijing, capital of China, Dec. 17, 2015. [Xinhua]


China and Russia signed more than 30 cooperation documents in energy, investment, finance, high technology and other areas during the 20th China-Russia Prime Ministers' Regular Meeting on Thursday.

Energy giants Sinopec and Rosneft signed an MOU on oil and gas projects in eastern Siberia while CNPC and Gazprom inked an agreement on the design and construction of the cross-border section of China-Russia east-route natural gas pipeline.

China Development Bank and Russia's state corporation Vnesheconombank (VEB) also signed an agreement on a 10 billion yuan (1.56 billion U.S. dollars) loan.

"The slew of deals signed between China and Russia is a testimony of a higher level of our relationship, and we are determined to ensure their implementation," Chinese Premier Li Keqiang said when meeting the press along with his Russian counterpart Dmitry Medvedev.

With the sluggish global economic recovery, lower commodity prices and downward pressure for economies, China and Russia have faced common challenges for growth, Li said.

"But China and Russia have faced downward pressure on the economy head on," he said, citing increased Chinese commodity imports from Russia and rising bilateral cooperation in energy, equipment, high technology and e-commerce.

Both premiers called on the two countries to find new growth engines.

China proposed joint efforts to set industrial capacity and equipment manufacturing as new areas to power the economy, urging implementation of key cooperation projects and more cooperation in areas including energy, finance, aviation, agriculture and military technology.

Li also proposed carrying out cooperation in oil exploration, development and refineries, and aligning China's development strategies of innovation, mass entrepreneurship and "Made in China 2025" plan with Russia's Development Strategy by 2020.

China is willing to work with Russia to join China's Silk Road Economic Belt initiative with the Russian development strategy as well as the Russia-initiated Eurasian Economic Union, Li said.

Russia and China have made breakthroughs in agricultural cooperation, Medvedev said, praising cooperation documents signed on quarantine inspection requirements on exporting Russian wheat, corn, rice and soybean to China.

Russia hopes to work with China to outline future cooperation and explore new ways and areas for cooperation, Medvedev said, suggesting both sides further practical cooperation in trade and investment, mining resources, oil and gas, nuclear, aerospace, agriculture, finance and military technology.

China and Russia agreed to prepare for a successful China-Russia Media Exchange Year in 2016 and 2017. Li and Medvedev called on the media to contribute to the understanding and friendship of the people in the two countries.
*(@Beidou2020 , this could be an opportunity for the Chinese international media to learn from the likes of RT, Sputnik and Russian-Insider.)


In a joint communique released after the meeting, the two countries pledged to enhance coordination in the Shanghai Cooperation Organization and jointly fight terrorism.

They reaffirmed support in political settlement of the Syria issue and the UN's key role. They vowed to maintain peace and stability in the Korean Peninsula and play constructive roles in a comprehensive, long-lasting and proper settlement of Iran's nuclear issue, said the communique.

Prior to the meeting, Li held a red-carpet ceremony to welcome Medvedev at the Great Hall of the People.



Chinese Premier Li Keqiang (R) and Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev co-chair the 20th China-Russia Prime Ministers' Regular Meeting in Beijing, capital of China, Dec. 17, 2015. [Xinhua]

b8aeed98990b17dd9fb516.jpg

Chinese Premier Li Keqiang and Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev co-chair the 20th China-Russia Prime Ministers' Regular Meeting in Beijing, capital of China, Dec. 17, 2015. [Xinhua]

***

Looks like China-Russia partnership is really an all-around, multi-leveled and multi-lateral one, comprising areas from economic development to security and global-geopolitical cooperation.

Most importantly, China and Russia do indeed look eye to eye in terms of their conceptualization of international governance.

Good news for the world.

@Chinese-Dragon , @vostok
 
The problem with Russia is that they had a system that somewhat worked, and then broke it.

Don't fix what isn't broken.

Always check yourself before you wreck yourself.

Most of my Russian classmates hated perestroika and glasnost. But they say the system began to somewhat deteriorate before Gorbachev. Of course, his decision to entirely dismantle the system was wrong; he could have simply adjusted to the new requirements of the time. After all, this was what dialectical materialism would suggest.
 
Back
Top Bottom