What's new

The fifth suspect of Christchurch shootings has defected to Israel

Thanks. Will watch this.

Because we speak English
Reminder. Critical component in Britain is ..... England/English.

brit.png


New York ~ the real York is here
Birmingham ~ the real Birmingham is here
New England ~ the real deal is here
etc False copies/ripp offs of the original.
 
To justify the existence of Israel you need Muslims and Christian at war with each other and then being allied with one you complete the dream of greater Israel. If world stays human no one will accept the Israeli occupation so for being accepted by West Israel needs to throw a wedge between Muslims and Christians. How to do that? Make a Christian kill Muslims and then make a Muslim kill Christian and there you go one of them will eventually help and side with Israel. How a Zionist brain works.

Exactly. They want a CLASH OF CIVILIZATIONS!!!!!
 
MARK MY WORDS:

THE NEXT EVENT THAT IS TO COME WILL AN ATTACK ON A VERY BIG CHRISTIAN SYMBOL OR CITY - THE ATTACK WILL BE ATTRIBUTED AS A REVENGE FOR THE CHRISTCHURCH KILLINGS.

BEHIND THE ATTACK WILL BE ZIONISTS

When Muhammad Ali died, the entire world mourned him and tremendous sympathy poured in for Muslims.

Not long afterwards came the Orlando shooter who attacked a gay nightclub and that undid all the positivity for Muslims created by Muhammad Ali’s death.

I don’t think it is a coincidence.

Having sympathies and humanity for Muslims is seen as dangerous and against the interests of Zionists who control the media and Western governments through lobbies.

Turkey, Iran and Pakistan are key countries if the Muslim world shall rise again.
Pakistan has China to back it up and Iran looks like it is holding it's own against the US-Jewish-Arab puppet nexus.
Turkey looks like the most vulnerable as it has only really got an alliance of convenience with Russia.

Some excellent analysis right here.

Russia cannot be trusted as you say.

Turkey needs to get closer to Iran and also link up with Pakistan-Chinese axis.

Russia has a lot of bad history with both Turkey and Pakistan, mostly because as Orthodox and Soviet empires, it tried to conquer the regions of our influence [Balkans, Greece, Caucasus, and Afghanistan.]

Both Turkey and Pakistan are frontier Muslim nations with a strong emphasis of Ghazis/Mujahideen, kismet/divine destiny, and nonsectarian Islam in order to unite all Muslims.

For those who wish to control the Muslim world, both nations represent a threat and have potential to be world powers in their own right.

Turkey needs to make peace with China and join this bloc. Pakistan is working overtime to convince the Turks.

Turkey’s influence on CARs needs to be increased (Russian influence decreased) and this whole region needs to be re-integrated back economically, politically, and militarily with its natural partners: Turkey, Iran, Pakistan, and China.

The-map-of-One-Belt-and-One-Road-initiative-Source-McKinsey-Company.png
 
Last edited:
When Muhammad Ali died, the entire world mourned him and tremendous sympathy poured in for Muslims.

Not long afterwards came the Orlando shooter who attacked a gay nightclub and that undid all the positivity for Muslims created by Muhammad Ali’s death.
Yeah!!
That was a typical false flag. The Orlando shooter worked for a security company G4S.
 
Yeah!!
That was a typical false flag. The Orlando shooter worked for a security company G4S.

He himself was a closet gay and got AIDS from someone from that club, according to his friend.

He had a motive for personal vengeance, but somehow became a poster boy to bash Muslims all over the world.

The police shot most of the victims. It was impossible for him to kill that many.
 
Last edited:
I use to think that but I live very Jewish area of town they are like clannish in nature plus I have heard them say nasty s..it about Asians and non-whites they are very racial as a people they just try their best not to show it or they will use the Holocaust card

@Reddington @Pan-Islamic-Pakistan
https://jamesperloff.com/2016/05/23...ba-and-the-mystery-of-the-best-picture-oscar/

"Contrary to what many Christians believe, it is the Talmud, not the Torah (Old Testament) that is the chief doctrinal teaching of modern rabbinic Judaism. It is the written form of the cumulative oral “tradition of the elders,” which Jesus Christ so resoundingly condemned the Pharisees for. Talmudic Jewry regards non-Jews as inferior and often justifies lying to, stealing from, and killing gentiles. For documentation of this, I highly recommend Michael Hoffman’s book Judaism’s Strange Gods. As Brother Nathanael has pointed out elsewhere, it was the behavior and endemic racism of Talmudic Jews that caused them to be expelled from more than 100 countries throughout history, not some sort of universal bigotry against their ethnicity or religion."
 
Exactly. They want a CLASH OF CIVILIZATIONS!!!!!

If some one is interested then they should read about Bernard Lewis. The Zionist Jew who first coined the term "Clash of Civilizations". The Crescent and the Cross at each other throats.



Khaled Diab

Bernard Lewis and the clash of civilisations that never was
The London-born British American scholar died aged 101 [Getty]

Date of publication: 23 May, 2018



Comment: Lewis' 'clash of the civilisations' theory made him the orientalist of choice for America's neo-conservative establishment, writes Khaled Diab.

Tags:
Clash of civilisations, Bernard Lewis, Orientalism, Edward Said




Bernard Lewis, the British-American historian and probably the most influential orientalist thinker of his generation, was born as the Ottoman empire was tottering on its last legs.

He died last weekend, just shy of his 102nd birthday, as the post-Ottoman Middle East order nears its complete collapse.
Although some of Lewis' early academic work was groundbreaking, such as his research into medieval Islamic guilds and the insights he gleaned from the Ottoman archives, it rapidly descended into politicised polemics, which ultimately proved extremely destructive to the Middle East.

"For the past several years Lewis has been engaged in preaching scholarship and practising politics," Edward Said, the author of the groundbreaking study Orientalism, wrote in one of his regular heated exchanges with Lewis, back in 1982. "It is of course quite natural for scholars to have political views and even to impart those views to their students and colleagues in an honest manner. Lewis is guilty of no such balance or discipline."

Lewis was the orientalist of choice for America's neo-conservative establishment and "his wisdom is sought daily by policymakers, diplomats, fellow academics, and the news media," in the words of former US Vice President Dick Cheney. Lewis is credited, alongside Samuel Huntington, with providing the intellectual framework for the 2003 invasion of Iraq.

One of Lewis' most damaging theories was that of the "clash of civilisations".

Although the term is most commonly associated with Huntington, Bernard Lewis used it earlier, and somewhat differently. While Huntington focused on perceived conflicts along the fault lines between half a dozen or so civilisations, Bernard Lewis' theory focused on the alleged centuries-old clash between Islam and the West (formerly known as Christendom).


"It should by now be clear that we are facing a mood and a movement far transcending the level of issues and policies and the governments that pursue them," Lewis wrote in 1990, in what has proved to be one of the most influential essays of recent decades.

"This is no less than a clash of civilisations - the perhaps irrational but surely historic reaction of an ancient rival against our Judeo-Christian heritage, our secular present, and the worldwide expansion of both."

Given, then, that two influential public intellectuals alleged that we are in the throes of a clash of civilisations, is there any evidence to back up their theory?

Yes, there is… but only if you are ideologically inclined - like neo-cons, Christian and Islamic fundamentalists, and modern-day jihadis - to believe in such a clash, and pick and choose the evidence to support your thesis, while ignoring other inconvenient facts and realities.

In fact, though the term is relatively new, the notion that Christendom and Islam are age-old and irreconcilable rivals has an ancient pedigree. Examples include the historical notions of jihads and crusades, not to mention the idea of 'civilisation versus barbarism' espoused by dominant power and influential voices on both sides throughout the centuries.

But as I examine in a chapter dedicated to this crucial question in my new book, this clash exists mainly in the fevered imagination of the fanatic or the skilled political leader, and does not stand up to sustained political or historical scrutiny.

At this point, I should point out that conflicts are extremely complex issues, which are usually poorly understood even by those involved in them, that cannot be reduced to any single root cause.

That said, religious identity and culture, in my analysis, have played a remarkably minor role in the interactions between Islam (the Middle East) and Christendom (the West), both today and historically.

leftQuots.png
The conflicts we are witnessing today are not so much a clash between civilisations, as a crash of civilisation
rightQuots.png


This is underlined, in my view, by what I call the clash within civilisations (not to mention the clashes within individual societies), the conflicts which have plagued both sides and often posed a greater existential threat than the external enemy. This is exemplified by the two world wars and the current wildfire tearing through the Middle East.

It is also exemplified by the oft surreal cross-civilisational alliances that emerge. If civilisations clash over values, then the largely decades-old cosy relationship between the regressive Gulf monarchies and Britain then the United States should not exist, yet what I call the oiligarchy shows no sign of losing its potency, even under the stewardship of the Islamophobic Donald Trump.

And these alliances are scarcely new.

Protestant England had a long-standing alliance with the Ottomans against Catholic Spain. Caliph Harun al-Rashid and the Holy Roman Emperor Charlemagne were involved a robust, multi-generational coalition against their mutual foes, the Byzantines and Umayyads. Going even further back, the conquest of Iberia by Muslim forces would not have occurred without the encouragement and aid of the very Christian Julian of Septem (Ceuta).

93cc3ba9-ca68-4734-8faf-c9bcbfb31433

Lewis was a favoured scholar among members of the George W. Bush administration in the lead up to the 2003 invasion of Iraq [Getty]
Over and beyond all this, there is what I call the mash of civilisations, through which Islam and Christendom have so influenced one another, and been influenced by the same precursors, including ancient Greek, Egyptian and Mesopotamian influences, that it is impossible to separate them into two distinct civilisations.

The conflicts we are witnessing today are not so much a clash between civilisations, as a crash of civilisation.

By this, I do not mean the collapse of civilisation and the end of technologically advanced human society, but rather the more mundane and periodic crumbling of the dominant political, economic and social orders, as they become unsustainable, imploding and exploding under the weight of their contradictions.

It is far easier to blame monolithic metaphysical forces for our problems than to examine the actual socio-economic and geopolitical fault lines at play, because that would require changes few are willing or courageous enough to make.

But continuing to ignore the painful realities in favour of comforting illusions and delusions will lead to serious misdiagnosis of the situation, and the prescribed medication, rather than offering a cure will threaten the very survival of the patient.


Khaled Diab is a journalist and writer who is currently based in Tunisia. He is the author of two books: Islam for the Politically Incorrect (2017) and Intimate Enemies (2014).

Follow him on Twitter: @DiabolicalIdea

Opinions expressed in this article remain those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The New Arab, its editorial board or staff.

https://www.alaraby.co.uk/english/c...wis-the-clash-of-civilisations-that-never-was
 
New Zealand alleged killer visited Israel in 2016

Agencies On Mar 18, 2019 Last Updated Mar 18, 2019
Christchurch-shooting-750x369-1-750x369.jpg

The Australian white supremacist who carried out a massacre at two mosques in New Zealand briefly visited Israel in 2016, Israeli officials said Monday.

Brenton Tarrant arrived on a 3-month tourist visa and stayed in Israel for nine days in October 2016, immigration authority spokeswoman Sabine Haddad said.

She was not able to provide further details on the visit by the 28-year-old.

Tarrant has been charged with murder over the worst modern-day massacre in New Zealand in which 50 people were killed at two mosques in Christchurch on Friday.

He grew up in the small town of Grafton in Australia, but had travelled widely in recent years.

Social media posts suggested his travels included trips as far afield as North Korea. He had also visited Greece, Croatia and Bulgaria, among other countries.

Tarrant had recently lived in Dunedin, some 350km from Christchurch.

Australian Home Affairs Minister Peter Dutton said Monday that Tarrant had spent only 45 days in Australia over the past three years and was not on any terror watch lists.

New Zealand will tighten gun laws in the wake of its worst modern-day massacre, the government said Monday, as it emerged the white supremacist accused of carrying out the killings at two mosques will represent himself in court.

https://arynews.tv/en/new-zealand-killer-visit-israel-2016/



@OsmanAli98
 
It's cool


American english is simple and very easy to understand by other people.
british english is very bizarre, The accents The slangs:what:

There is english and rest are mistakes (american english)
 
New Zealand alleged killer visited Israel in 2016

Agencies On Mar 18, 2019 Last Updated Mar 18, 2019
Christchurch-shooting-750x369-1-750x369.jpg

The Australian white supremacist who carried out a massacre at two mosques in New Zealand briefly visited Israel in 2016, Israeli officials said Monday.

Brenton Tarrant arrived on a 3-month tourist visa and stayed in Israel for nine days in October 2016, immigration authority spokeswoman Sabine Haddad said.

She was not able to provide further details on the visit by the 28-year-old.

Tarrant has been charged with murder over the worst modern-day massacre in New Zealand in which 50 people were killed at two mosques in Christchurch on Friday.

He grew up in the small town of Grafton in Australia, but had travelled widely in recent years.

Social media posts suggested his travels included trips as far afield as North Korea. He had also visited Greece, Croatia and Bulgaria, among other countries.

Tarrant had recently lived in Dunedin, some 350km from Christchurch.

Australian Home Affairs Minister Peter Dutton said Monday that Tarrant had spent only 45 days in Australia over the past three years and was not on any terror watch lists.

New Zealand will tighten gun laws in the wake of its worst modern-day massacre, the government said Monday, as it emerged the white supremacist accused of carrying out the killings at two mosques will represent himself in court.

https://arynews.tv/en/new-zealand-killer-visit-israel-2016/



@OsmanAli98
He also visited Pakistan
Funny when I posted about him visiting in Pakistan I got my thread instantly closed and negative rate, but him visiting Israel is a reason for celebration among the community
 
Back
Top Bottom