What's new

The end of the deal, hopes, delusions and treasons

Not true. Some of the most damaging sanctions are gone. A French company having a branch in the US can now do business with Iranian companies without fear that it will be prosecuted in the US. Global banks (nearly all of whom have a presence in the US) can now allow transfers of money to Iran - something they had stopped under the sanctions.

There are specific sanctions now against specific Iranian companies, true - but those do not affect non-sanctioned companies.

The Iran-US deal was definitely a good thing for Iran.
today even our embassy's bank account in U.K are blocked. south korea embassy has to smuggle it's required money to Iran, we sell (give away) our oil, but we can't receive it's money! we want to import gas from Turkmenistan and we can't pay the money. these are some samples of the so called good results for Iran.
 
.
today even our embassy's bank account in U.K are blocked. south korea embassy has to smuggle it's required money to Iran, we sell (give away) our oil, but we can't receive it's money! we want to import gas from Turkmenistan and we can't pay the money. these are some samples of the so called good results for Iran.

I'm genuinely sorry to know this. All the news stories I read seem to suggest inward money transfer to Iran was stable now. Perhaps the delay is on account of Iran not being a member of SWIFT as yet?

See this news story

http://www.presstv.com/Detail/2016/02/01/448226/Iran-frozen-assets-sanctions-Nobakht/]
 
.
I'm genuinely sorry to know this. All the news stories I read seem to suggest inward money transfer to Iran was stable now. Perhaps the delay is on account of Iran not being a member of SWIFT as yet?

See this news story

http://www.presstv.com/Detail/2016/02/01/448226/Iran-frozen-assets-sanctions-Nobakht/]
most of the news in west are fake, as part of the deal, foreign banks were supposed to release our blocked money, it was around $100 billion, yet to this very day almost nothing of that money has returned. we are part of swift and we have access to it, but due to the threats from U.S, foreign banks wont accept our swift messages. right now their excuse is FATF, and that's why I said U.S cheated Iran

firstly FATF wasn't part of preconditions for removing the sanctions, and secondly we weren't part of FATF before the sanctions too, so it's nothing but a mere excuse.
it's not a delay but another extra conditions which are being imposed by U.S, firstly to get access to our financial transactions (which is a security issue for us) and secondly to force us stop supporting resistance groups like Hizbollah and Hamas, which again isn't part of the deal and we will never accept it too.

another excuse is the primary U.S sanctions which limits our access to dollar transactions, while again this law was already paused before the sanctions and secondly we were supposed to get access to our money without further conditions.
 
Last edited:
.
so you negotiate with the DEVIL and you are shocked being fucked over :D
the USA has a long record in history fucking over every country, dont be shocked (They promised UDSSR dont expand with NATO, and now they are knocking at russians doors)
I hope next iranians negotiatiors will clean the ROUHANI-mess, SCREW THE DEAL!
 
. .
. . .
State-backed British bank rebuffs government push to boost Iran trade: sources

By Jonathan Saul, Parisa Hafezi and Andrew MacAskill | LONDON/ANKARA

The Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS.L) has rebuffed efforts by the British government, a major shareholder, to coax the lender into facilitating trade with Iran as it seeks to avoid risky business, sources with knowledge of the discussions say.In recent months British officials have sought to boost business ties with Iran - a year on from the lifting of international sanctions - as Britain tries to forge new trade ties following June's vote to leave the European Union.The sources said Britain's finance ministry had tried to use the government's influence with RBS and to a lesser extent Lloyds (LLOY.L), in which it holds a minority stake, to help speed up trade finance with Iran, including clearing services for Iranian banks in pounds.Despite the lifting of international sanctions, which included banking restrictions, Iran continues to struggle to access Western finance and tap major Western banks, hindering trade and investment.A senior Iranian banking official said Tehran had several meetings in recent months with British government officials."We asked UK officials to help us to overcome this issue. We were promised that the British government would try to convince the banks, including Lloyds and RBS," the official said."Nothing is happening on the ground."A British government source said the finance ministry was highly aware of the complexities around UK and Iranian banking channels and banks would consider factors including remaining U.S. sanctions, corruption and money laundering issues.The British government owns 71 percent of RBS, though its bank shareholdings are managed by UK Financial Investments which is meant to ensure they are managed on a commercial basis."The government does not take the risk decisions - they are only shareholders," a Western source with knowledge of discussions said. "It is not the role of shareholders to set the risk appetite of a bank."An RBS executive said separately the bank was "not really interested in the Middle East" and was focused on Britain and Ireland for about 90 percent of its profits.A Lloyds spokesman said it was a UK-focused retail and commercial bank, adding that it was "mindful that Iran remains a higher risk country with which to do business"."We therefore consider all requests on a case-by-case basis in order to protect the bank and our customers," the spokesman said.
DOLLAR TRADE CURBS
Edinburgh-based RBS was rescued with a more than 45 billion pound ($55.42 billion) bailout at the height of the financial crisis.The government also has just under a 6 percent stake in Lloyds and is aiming to return the bank to full private ownership this year after a 20.5 billion pound taxpayer-funded rescue during global turmoil nearly a decade ago.Iran, which has sharply stepped up oil production since sanctions were lifted, remains restricted from most dollar trades but is able to use other foreign currencies including euros and pounds.But Tehran has struggled to get transactions processed via the UK, frustrating its efforts to boost access to London's financial markets, which remains one of the world's biggest sources of capital.Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister for Europe and America Affairs Majid Takht Ravanchi expressed frustration with the slow pace of ties at a meeting in Tehran on Thursday with British Minister for the Middle East and Africa Tobias Ellwood.Ravanchi said any progress in relations "should be based on mutual respect".British officials have said resolving banking issues was a "priority" for the government.
A British government spokesperson said it was committed to working closely with all parties, including British banks and industry groups, "to help open up the huge opportunities for trade between the UK and Iran".Banks remain nervous after U.S. penalties including a $9 billion fine on France's BNP Paribas (BNPP.PA) in 2014, partly for violating financial sanctions imposed in 2012 to pressure Iran to abandon its nuclear program.
TRUMP UNCERTAINTY
U.S. sanctions, which prohibit U.S. lenders and persons from doing business with Iran, remain in place.Major global lenders like HSBC (HSBA.L) which have large operations in Britain have reiterated they have no intention of doing any new business involving Iran, questioning why the United States has encouraged them to do so when U.S. financial firms are restricted.Donald Trump, who will be sworn in as U.S. president on Friday, has previously opposed the nuclear deal reached by his predecessor Barack Obama. But it is not clear what he will do next, adding to nervousness among many banks."As long as Trump’s Iran policy is unclear, I think there will not be a tangible movement from the British banks," a second Iranian banking official said. "It seems that British banks, whether small or government-backed ones, prefer to wait before starting to do trade with Iran."

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-iran-britain-banks-idUSKBN1532GM
 
.
and here comes another violation of the deal by United states, the executive order on visa and Immigration restrictions.

the JCPOA:
28. The E3/EU+3 and Iran commit to implement this JCPOA in good faith and in a constructive atmosphere, based on mutual respect, and to refrain from any action inconsistent with the letter, spirit and intent of this JCPOA that would undermine its successful implementation. Senior Government officials of the E3/EU+3 and Iran will make every effort to support the successful implementation of this JCPOA including in their public statements[2]. The E3/EU+3 will take all measures required to lift sanctions and will refrain from imposing exceptional or discriminatory regulatory and procedural requirements in lieu of the sanctions and restrictive measures covered by the JCPOA.

29. The EU and its Member States and the United States, consistent with their respective laws, will refrain from any policy specifically intended to directly and adversely affect the normalisation of trade and economic relations with Iran inconsistent with their commitments not to undermine the successful implementation of this JCPOA.
 
.
Wendy Sherman top U.S negotiator mocks Iranian foreign minister for not knowing the basic English and the difference between "lift of sanctions" and "end of sanctions", totally shameful.
the funny thing is that Mr Zarif has a Ph.D in international studies from Denver university, probably a degree like Mr Rouhani with a thesis which is a copy paste stealing from other authors!

video: Wendy Sherman on Iran deal

well, I have to praise our enemies, if I was them, I would give a free Ph.D to all idiots inside Iran too!
 
.
Wendy Sherman top U.S negotiator mocks Iranian foreign minister for not knowing the basic English and the difference between "lift of sanctions" and "end of sanctions", totally shameful.
the funny thing is that Mr Zarif has a Ph.D in international studies from Denver university, probably a degree like Mr Rouhani with a thesis which is a copy paste stealing from other authors!

video: Wendy Sherman on Iran deal

well, I have to praise our enemies, if I was them, I would give a free Ph.D to all idiots inside Iran too!
:lol: Ahmadinejad, Raeisi, ghalibaf and all of your islamist gang speak viiirryyy guuud engilish
 
.
Wendy Sherman top U.S negotiator mocks Iranian foreign minister for not knowing the basic English and the difference between "lift of sanctions" and "end of sanctions", totally shameful.
the funny thing is that Mr Zarif has a Ph.D in international studies from Denver university, probably a degree like Mr Rouhani with a thesis which is a copy paste stealing from other authors!

video: Wendy Sherman on Iran deal

well, I have to praise our enemies, if I was them, I would give a free Ph.D to all idiots inside Iran too!
I'm not sure what his mastery of the English language has to do with the fact that the regime of sanctions. As she said in the video and as known by anyone one following the news, there are different sanctions levied against us some at the U.N. level and some unilateral sanctions that were levied in U.S. congress. You understand that Obama had no control of congress....right? So just like the IRGC gangs in Iran were working to undermine the negotiations, the AIPAC lobby was hard at work making sure Obama could not lift all the sanctions here. Besides, don't slam Zariff and Rouhani for what that Donkey (using donkey to describe Ahmadinejad is an insult to a good and useful animal) got us into. I suggest you point that finger right back at the so called hardliners. I hope Raisi or Ghalibaf wins...you know why? Because it will bring the end of these dunces sooner.
One disclaimer I'm neither Shahi not an MKO or other bullshit group sympathizer. I'm just an Iranian kid who migrated to the U.S. to go to school. I'm just tired of watching my country being ran by amateurs for the last 30+ years.

PS: Folks, think about it....who wouldn't want the sanctions lifted and our oil sold freely? The answer is the people who are making a fortune selling our oil on the black market and pocketing a fee...the same people who are making money bring in all the goods via the protection of the IRGC that regular bazaar folks can't under the sanctions. This is not patriotism this is theft!
 
.
I'm not sure what his mastery of the English language has to do with the fact that the regime of sanctions. As she said in the video and as known by anyone one following the news, there are different sanctions levied against us some at the U.N. level and some unilateral sanctions that were levied in U.S. congress. You understand that Obama had no control of congress....right? So just like the IRGC gangs in Iran were working to undermine the negotiations, the AIPAC lobby was hard at work making sure Obama could not lift all the sanctions here. Besides, don't slam Zariff and Rouhani for what that Donkey (using donkey to describe Ahmadinejad is an insult to a good and useful animal) got us into. I suggest you point that finger right back at the so called hardliners. I hope Raisi or Ghalibaf wins...you know why? Because it will bring the end of these dunces sooner.
One disclaimer I'm neither Shahi not an MKO or other bullshit group sympathizer. I'm just an Iranian kid who migrated to the U.S. to go to school. I'm just tired of watching my country being ran by amateurs for the last 30+ years.

PS: Folks, think about it....who wouldn't want the sanctions lifted and our oil sold freely? The answer is the people who are making a fortune selling our oil on the black market and pocketing a fee...the same people who are making money bring in all the goods via the protection of the IRGC that regular bazaar folks can't under the sanctions. This is not patriotism this is theft!
anyone who has followed the JCPOA procedure knows that Rouhani and Zarif were promising the end of all sanctions. Zarif during his speech about JCPOA in parliament went as far as saying that the word "suspension" doesn't even exist in the JCPOA! though today sanctions haven't even suspended, they are all effectively in place.
we destroyed $30 billion of our nuclear infrastructures, fired scientists, shout down our space program, shut down our university projects (which is equal to migration of our youth) for what? if sanctions were supposed to remain then what was the goal of the deal?
simply to please the AIPAC and netanyahu who no longer asks about the scrapping of the deal. and indeed why would any of our enemies want to scrap it.
It's funny how you blame the Ahmadinejad for sanctions, while it was your beloved Obama who imposed these sanctions on us, obviously not to stop (the none existing) nuclear weapon program, but to stop our advancement, though your beloved Obama claimed the goal of sanctions were provoking people against government (Ahmadinejad). indeed Iran's enemies (U.S/Zionists/Wahhabis) didn't like Ahmadinejad, and you're in the same side with them whether you are Shahi/MKO/troll or not.
 
.
You have a narrow view of the subject, which comes from being brainwashed by daily propaganda. You use words like your "beloved Obama", you don't have a clue about my political inclinations. You and the parties you spout about on here will play us right into the hands of the Zionists. There is ample proof of how much ruin that ideology has brought down on our people's head. Yet you have the balls to come here and tell us the Ahmadinejad and hardliners ideology works and is better for us. People like you are the reason an island with little resources like Dubai is kicking our ***. Go home and instead of burning books read a few.
 
Last edited:
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom