The delusion of identity

[Airboss786]

Because there is only one Indian Hindu on this thread saying that. Whereas it's quite common too see Pakistani members on the forum claiming Persian, Arab etc

Show us the 'PROOF'! Go do some research!

 

[KingMamba]

Here's an early form of Shiva, doesn't look very monotheistic.

No proof that this represents shiva other than Hindu hopefuls.

 

[INDIC]

No he refers to it as hind greeks translations dropped the h when they were describing his conquests. Even the greeks however were talking about the IVC and it was not until 300 BC when it came to denote anything past the IV.

But I read even Persisn meant land beyond Indus as India, nobody considered land only around Indus as India. BTW we are talking about about Greek definition of India, Alexander knew India until Bengal(Gangaridai) while Megasthanes wrote accounts of entire North India and South India, so don't bring Persians as we are discussing Greeks description of India and you are proved wrong.

 

[ranjeet]

Its to late buddy, you was never meant to follow perfect vedic religion. Our ancestors made sure of that.

oh come on now be good boy !!!

 

[good_boy]

But I read even Persisn meant land beyond Indus as India, nobody considered land only around Indus as India. BTW we are talking about about Greek definition of India, Alexander knew India until Bengal(Gangadhirai) while Megasthanes wrote accounts of entire North India and South India, so don't bring Persians as we are discussing Greeks description of India and you are proved wrong.

Persians are next door and whole indus valley was part of their empire. But lets believe in greeks anyway lol

 

[farhan_9909]

@farhan_9909

Do you believe in migration theory?



516 BC

I don't know why indian believes in this shit.

When in reality iranian people are only 150-200million at max while the persian are just 60million.Almost same size as the pashtuns.

If we go by this method and all the north indians are aryan.While north india population is several times more than whole of the iranic people or persian by several times.

 

[Dem!god]

It did not evolve there is no proof it had anything to do with religion of ancient Indus valley people zero none at all. Nobody cares about what you believe today we are talking about history.

do you think I care on what you believe....
yes it has many proof....
we worship Durga..also known as mother goddess in IVC...
we have lord Shiva....which is there in IVC pashupati seal...

No proof that this represents shiva other than Hindu hopefuls.

then give me proof it does not represent shiva.....if you can....
don't talk..BS>...

 

[KingMamba]

But I read even Persisn meant land beyond Indus as India, nobody considered land only around Indus as India. BTW we are talking about about Greek definition of India, Alexander knew India until Bengal(Gangadhirai) while Megasthanes wrote accounts of entire North India and South India, so don't bring Persians as we are discussing Greeks description of India and you are proved wrong.

Alexander knew of what the Persians called India which was the IV people because he knew of the empires of Cyrus and later Darius that he wanted to emulate. It was only after he reached IV he realized there are more people further beyond as well but his army did not want to go further. Megasthanes came after Alexander as well he came during the Diadochi and it was from then on the Greeks just bunched all of South asia into the same definition.

 

[good_boy]

No proof that this represents shiva other than Hindu hopefuls.

ofcourse not, but Indian hindus have ruined history by bringing religion in to it. Thats why their historians are considered jokes.

 

[KingMamba]

do you think I care on what you believe....
yes it has many proof....
we worship Durga..also known as mother goddess in IVC...
we have lord Shiva....which is there in IVC pashupati seal...

then give me proof it does not represent shiva.....if you can....
don't talk..BS>...

You are making the claim it represents shiva idiot you have to prove it does not me. The burden of proof is on the claimant. Durga is not known as the mother goddess of IVC lmaoo ok give me proof. Show me the seals of indus valley that translate to "we worship durga mother goddess" go ahead I am waiting.

 

[good_boy]

I don't know why indian believes in this shit.

When in reality iranian people are only 150-200million at max while the persian are just 60million.Almost same size as the pashtuns.

If we go by this method and all the north indians are aryan.While north india population is several times more than whole of the iranic people or persian by several times.

They believe anyone speaking Indo-Aryan language is aryan, from bihar to sri lanka people speak indo-aryan. While facts are only 3% of their population is actual decendents of aryans, the brahmins. Genetic tests proves it.

You are making the claim it represents shiva idiot you have to prove it does not me. The burden of proof is on the claimant. Durga is not known as the mother goddess of IVC lmaoo ok give me proof. Show me the seals of indus valley that translate to "we worship durga mother goddess" go ahead I am waiting.

They are also famous for inventing fake seals lol

 

[KingMamba]

ofcourse not, but Indian hindus have ruined history by bringing religion in to it. Thats why their historians are considered jokes.

This is hindu logic

is equal to

They cannot even say what it says on top of the elephant for all they know it says, "yo don't worship this thing".

 

[good_boy]

Alexander knew of what the Persians called India which was the IV people because he knew of the empires of Cyrus and later Darius that he wanted to emulate. It was only after he reached IV he realized there are more people further beyond as well but his army did not want to go further. Megasthanes came after Alexander as well he came during the Diadochi and it was from then on the Greeks just bunched all of South asia into the same definition.

But but Greeks knew about whole India lol

 

[INDIC]

Alexander knew of what the Persians called India which was the IV people because he knew of the empires of Cyrus and later Darius that he wanted to emulate. It was only after he reached IV he realized there are more people further beyond as well but his army did not want to go further. Megasthanes came after Alexander as well he came during the Diadochi and it was from then on the Greeks just bunched all of South asia into the same definition.

You have no idea kid, people always knew land beyond Indus was always India but they never knew where it ended, it was Megasthanes who first gave the complete description of India which remained same for around 2 Millenniums. No Indian bring Persian here, we mainly mention Greek, so spare the Persians. Stop faking that India meant land only around Indus, that sounds nonsense.

 

[KingMamba]

You have no idea kid, people always knew land beyond Indus was always India but they never knew where it ended, it was Megasthanes who first gave the complete description of India which remained same for around 2 Millenniums. No Indian bring Persian here, we mainly mention Greek, so spare the Persians. Stop faking that India meant land only around Indus, that sounds nonsense.

Sound nonsense obviously to the quam whose name is derived from a foreign nations river lol.

Yeah but tell us where Greek got it from but no that would show you how ludicrious modern India really is.

Modern India is quivalent to the Macedonia debate.

See how little part of ancient Macedonia is now in modern Macedonia, Indians have the same thing going on trying to steal Pakistani ancient history.