What's new

The BRIC Countries Are The World’s New Global Navy

selvan33

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Nov 10, 2012
Messages
1,267
Reaction score
0
Country
India
Location
India
The BRIC Countries Are The World’s New Global Navy

chinese-navy-south-china-sea.gif


Offshore from Syria, Russia’s navy is conducting probably its largest naval deployment outside its own waters since the Soviet breakup. The Chinese navy is in another potential confrontation today with Japan in the East China Sea, and raising questions about where it is headed next.

But the BRIC nations as a whole—a force in the global economic conversation since the acronym was coined by Goldman Sachs to refer to the high-growth economies of Brazil, Russia, India and China—are becoming an increasing naval presence on the high seas. One reason is simple nature—when nations become wealthier, they tend to build up their fighting capabilities. But another is natural resources—all four nations either want to buy or sell oil and natural gas, and they are venturing further and further to do so.

A paradox is that while the shift challenges US primacy on the high seas, the US itself—because of its oil and gas boom—is driving part of the BRIC naval expansion.

Because it is providing for more and more of its own energy requirements, the US is importing much less African and Middle East crude, and the chief new buyers replacing it are BRIC nations—the US is about to be displaced by India as the largest buyer of Nigerian crude oil, for example. “It is only a matter of time before we see Indian ships in the South Atlantic [to patrol the coast of West Africa],” Brahma Chellaney, of the Center for Policy Research in New Delhi, told the Financial Times.

Such a shift—an expansion of Indian forces from the Indian Ocean to the Atlantic—would be huge. But so is the entirety of the BRIC naval activity. Russia has been a maritime power since Peter the Great, and Zheng He made China a major 15th century naval power. But Russia all-but stopped venturing outside former Soviet waters in 1992, and China has not fielded a major navy in the six centuries since Zheng He. Brazil and India have largely stuck to their own shores.

Beijing’s and Moscow’s naval assertiveness, particularly in Syria and the South and East China seas, attracts most of the attention. But India is building a second aircraft carrier, and may have three by 2020, along with four nuclear-powered submarines and various other modern ships. In 2012, India dispatched warships to the Horn of Africa, the Red Sea and the western Mediterranean. And in 2008 and 2010, India and Brazil conducted joint naval operations with South Africa on the Indian Ocean side of Africa.

In November 2012, some 10,000 Brazilian sailors and soldiers conducted an exercise called “Operation Atlantico 3,” meant to demonstrate the country’s ability to defend its offshore oilfields.

A greater BRIC role on global trade routes is not a negative development for the US, says Ely Ratner of the Center for a New American Security in Washington, DC.

“There’s no reason the American taxpayer should be subsidizing the freedom of navigation in the Indian Ocean when emerging powers like China and India are both increasingly capable of providing this service and are the primary beneficiaries of open sea lanes between Africa, the Middle East and Asia,” Ratner told me in an email exchange. “These trends will only become more prominent as the United States becomes even less reliant on direct access to Middle Eastern oil.”

The BRIC Countries Are The World
 
.
I am not sure which country are Brazil and South Africa's potential threat???
 
. .
Even all BRICS navies together wont stand a chance against the USN.

The point is not who is stronger. Just that these nations would have more role in petroling than USN.
 
. .
The point is not who is stronger. Just that these nations would have more role in petroling than USN.

Id say none of them do Kloitra. Just because Russia is stationing ships off Syria doesn't mean patrolling the seas is something it does more than the US. The US has carriers in multiple parts of the world. The scale is on an utterly different level.
 
.
Id say none of them do Kloitra. Just because Russia is stationing ships off Syria doesn't mean patrolling the seas is something it does more than the US. The US has carriers in multiple parts of the world. The scale is on an utterly different level.

For now yes. But if some other country petrols a route that is not of strategic/economic interest of US, it would better off not wasting resources on that route. This is the premise of the article.

“There’s no reason the American taxpayer should be subsidizing the freedom of navigation in the Indian Ocean when emerging powers like China and India are both increasingly capable of providing this service and are the primary beneficiaries of open sea lanes between Africa, the Middle East and Asia,” Ratner told me in an email exchange. “These trends will only become more prominent as the United States becomes even less reliant on direct access to Middle Eastern oil.”
 
.
This article just do not make sense when US owns the oceans of the world. In any case, all countries, not just BRICs, should be responsible for their own countries and their own economic sea lanes. Americans should not do what Europeans, Asian, Africans or Latin Americans ought to do for themselves. We are not mercenaries for hire.
 
. . . . .
Building ship for a ship to compete with the Americans in today's world is simply stupid having few missiles take out a billion dollars warship(just an example) is a better investment.

BRIC countries cant get along themselves as of now who knows in the future but till then they are no force never mind formidable against the Americans.
 
.
Here is something interesting...

Take United States Navy (USN)

Take the naval forces of whole rest of the world (192 U.N members including Russia, China, India, Islamic World, Europe etc)... (W.N ..means World Navy)

Now set up an all out, no holds-barred fight b/w USN and W.N in the global oceans..

It would go something like this...

Result

USN decimated W.N in less than 100 hours...

Conclusion : This article is bs...BRIC's navy is as irrelevant as Pakistani navy...actually, its even more irrelevant..b/c BRICS navy doesn't exist..lol...If anything, indian navy and chinese navy are competing with each other...

Just a 'feel good' article for some people..
 
.
Here is something interesting...

Take United States Navy (USN)

Take the naval forces of whole rest of the world (192 U.N members including Russia, China, India, Islamic World, Europe etc)... (W.N ..means World Navy)

Now set up an all out, no holds-barred fight b/w USN and W.N in the global oceans..

It would go something like this...

Result

USN decimated W.N in less than 100 hours...

Conclusion : This article is bs...BRIC's navy is as irrelevant as Pakistani navy...actually, its even more irrelevant..b/c BRICS navy doesn't exist..lol...If anything, indian navy and chinese navy are competing with each other...

Just a 'feel good' article for some people..

Indeed, the USN is by far the most formidable of all of the arms in the US Armed Forces.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom