What's new

The ADA LCA: Beloved Aircraft or a Lemon

Lack of Satisfactory Evidential proof Regarding Many Parameters of the FOC Disputes Although there some Unverified Credential data is there but not from from credible sources
Don't Engage them. only argue with Facts or they will get reason to Ban you mate

And what the heck are your facts ? An unverified idwr website ? How much material you have read about JF-17 from neutral sources ?

Repeating same nonsense about evidential proofs doesn't make your facts "facts" but rather cynical and nonsensical arguments devoid of any facts and figures.


When F-22 achieved it's FOC and when it was deployed to combat ? Seriously you are a thick head who doesn't' know what point I'm trying to convey.

Anyways. this amply proves that your logic and definition of FOC is a complete BS.
 
. . .
And what the heck are your facts ? An unverified idwr website ? How much material you have read about JF-17 from neutral sources ?

Repeating same nonsense about evidential proofs doesn't make your facts "facts" but rather cynical and nonsensical arguments devoid of any facts and figures.



.

Thats the problem, we never find any neutral source, a neutral source would be considered when it comes out from the manufacturers and the designers themselves. Which we do not find as said again if there is any please provide. (I am lazy)
 
. .
Stop quoting my posts with useless replies.Or better understand the context of my posts of what I'm trying to covey which is proving FOC =/= employed in combat.
Already said FOC according to DOD : The Full Operational Capability (FOC) is when a system is delivered to a user and they have the ability to fully employ and maintain it to meet an operational need.
 
.
Thats the problem, we never find any neutral source, a neutral source would be considered when it comes out from the manufacturers and the designers themselves. Which we do not find as said again if there is any please provide. (I am lazy)

SMH. Can't understand if you are autistic or suffering asperger
 
.
IMHO ...Indians should not bothered themselves with these troll threads...and engage with discussion with some jealous trolls...who are desperate to their bones and have massive inferiority complex...for not making a decent CAR...let alone think of parity with India..

in ANY field...sane Pakistani members are welcome to reply my post.
 
.
And what the heck are your facts ? An unverified idwr website ? How much material you have read about JF-17 from neutral sources ?

Repeating same nonsense about evidential proofs doesn't make your facts "facts" but rather cynical and nonsensical arguments devoid of any facts and figures.



When F-22 achieved it's FOC and when it was deployed to combat ? Seriously you are a thick head who doesn't' know what point I'm trying to convey.

Anyways. this amply proves that your logic and definition of FOC is a complete BS.
As Far I know the nonsense evidential proofs is required to Put your facts In right Perspective and Prove Bold Claims that Exists still on papers in real world At-least other Air-forces Around the world do that.i Don't Know About PAF
 
.
Don't Engage them. only argue with Facts or they will get reason to Ban you mate
The problem in PDF is people here are not for discussion but rant based on imagination ,own perception while some claim insider news and some says they heard so. Go to Arjun MBT thread where some Analyst ignored the CAG report but still persistent on his own view based on guess work.
 
. . . . . .
Back
Top Bottom