What's new

The ADA LCA: Beloved Aircraft or a Lemon

And all these
Yes thanks to some member, we are privy to find out what's the Indian definition of Indigenous. :enjoy:
By the pakistani definition m1 abraMs, iPhone and f-35 would not count as "American" because the US "merely" developed those designs and incorporated some non-us parts

And yet somehow the jf-17 or mmbt-2000, obsolete designs completely designed in China, with practically every high-end component bought or sourced from outside, are triumphs of pakistani r&d
 
.
i dont get it

if LCA is a lemon and India is an enemy state for pakistan which is wasting its hard earned tax payers money on aso called "lemon" why are pakistanies so botherred to stop us in wasting owr money ?
 
. .
And all these

By the pakistani definition m1 abraMs, iPhone and f-35 would not count as "American" because the US "merely" developed those designs and incorporated some non-us parts

And yet somehow the jf-17 or mmbt-2000, obsolete designs completely designed in China, with practically every high-end component bought or sourced from outside, are triumphs of pakistani r&d
For your smart alec comments, it's suffice that no one ever has to question, how indigenous is JF-17 or the AK-2000, simply because Pakistan has never claimed as such however you will find some people (Not internet warriors) questioning the self proclaimed authenticity of the LCA. And yes the Pakistani weapons are obsolete since according to fan boys, it's the era of the Tejas which obviously matches up to it's ingenuity.
 
.
Indians and there miserable patriotism there own IAF guys privately when talk clearly say they are not happy with LCA but Indians will not learn
 
.
Indians and there miserable patriotism there own IAF guys privately when talk clearly say they are not happy with LCA but Indians will not learn
IAF Standards Are High and LCA Mk1 Not Fit According to their Modern Parameters which Fits MK2 Successfully .Same Goes for PLAAF they Find JF-17 Below Standard to their operational requirements And Inferior to their J-10 So they Sidelined it For PAF.
 
.
IAF Standards Are High and LCA Mk1 Not Fit According to their Modern Parameters which Fits MK2 Successfully .Same Goes for PLAAF they Find JF-17 Below Standard to their operational requirements And Inferior to their J-10 So they Sidelined it For PAF.
And what standards would that be .!!
PAF refused both the SU-27 and MiG-29 when offered back in 90s, so where does that put IAF or other Fulcrum and Flanker users..... or maybe it's the operational requirements of an air force that one prefers JF-17 and the other J-10.
 
.
If lca turns out to be a lemon then rest assured my Pakistani freinds that the Indians will place a order for either

150 gripen ng or f35,lightening single engined fighters.

The Indian airforce needs a single engines fighter.

So would paf prefer lca gripen or f35 as the opposition.

Money is no object between today and next decade with Indian defense budget to double from 40 billion dollars per year.now
 
.
And what standards would that be .!!
PAF refused both the SU-27 and MiG-29 when offered back in 90s, so where does that put IAF or other Fulcrum and Flanker users..... or maybe it's the operational requirements of an air force that one prefers JF-17 and the other J-10.


LOL .. They built LCA mk 1 .. which doesn't "fit" indian airforce standards (that I still flyin hundreds of 3rd gen jets) than why the fuk develop it in the first place?:lol:
 
.
If lca turns out to be a lemon then rest assured my Pakistani freinds that the Indians will place a order for either

150 gripen ng or f35,lightening single engined fighters.

The Indian airforce needs a single engines fighter.

So would paf prefer lca gripen or f35 as the opposition.

Money is no object between today and next decade with Indian defense budget to double from 40 billion dollars per year.now

Which ever you have the courage to fly over your parade venue.
 
.
LOL .. They built LCA mk 1 .. which doesn't "fit" indian airforce standards (that I still flyin hundreds of 3rd gen jets) than why the fuk develop it in the first place?:lol:
The fighter is good in current standards
But it's not good for future

IAF needs a 4.5 gen jet that will serve for 2+ decade
Mk1 doesn't fits that,mk2 does
mk1 in its current config is better than thunder but doesn't fulfills IAF needs
 
. .
And what standards would that be .!!
PAF refused both the SU-27 and MiG-29 when offered back in 90s, so where does that put IAF or other Fulcrum and Flanker users..... or maybe it's the operational requirements of an air force that one prefers JF-17 and the other J-10.
you are Known for Obsessions and Unverified Twitter Sources & blog sources.I give Up:rolleyes:
 
.
you are Known for Obsessions and Unverified Twitter Sources & blog sources.I give Up:rolleyes:

Really, when was the last time did i disappoint you. Please don't give up and read to your hearts content, if not satisfied, i can give more sources.

1994 | 2857 | Flight Archive


FYI India only flies twin engine jets for its republic days according to protocol.
And this is the guy in my avatar, also a dear friend performing in a single engine F-16 over the heart of Islamabad. :D

 
.
Really, when was the last time did i disappoint you. Please don't give up and read to your hearts content, if not satisfied, i can give more sources.

1994 | 2857 | Flight Archive



And this is the guy in my avatar, also a dear friend performing in a single engine F-16 over the heart of Islamabad. :D

Nice man :) you also a pilot or you work for Pakistan's Defense ministry or something (Don't know how it works there) and also because unluckily Pakistan has never had any twin engine fighters. No offense.
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom