"Tejas, A Three-Legged Cheetah": Former IAF Commander

[bhagat]

http://livefist.blogspot.com/2011/01/tejas-three-legged-cheetah-former-iaf.html

 

[GORKHALI]

 

[duhastmish]

IAF always want the imported tools to work with.

they dont like anything made in india. reason their commission is gone .

most top brass are agents. they get their cut and supply the expensive toys to india.

unlike chinese who preferred their - B class fighters for ages , but now since their airforce supported the indigenous production - they are coming on global platform.

may be better than most fighter manufacturer -

iaf need tight kick on their butt and realize - the priority and future should be in ingenious product - stop underestimating your own self. this just prove how week u think of your own coutnry.

 

[ajtr]

IAF always want the imported tools to work with.

they dont like anything made in india. reason their commission is gone .

most top brass are agents. they get their cut and supply the expensive toys to india.

unlike chinese who preferred their - B class fighters for ages , but now since their airforce supported the indigenous production - they are coming on global platform.

may be better than most fighter manufacturer -

iaf need tight kick on their butt and realize - the priority and future should be in ingenious product - stop underestimating your own self. this just prove how week u think of your own coutnry.

When one cant make a decent fighter even after spending lot of money and and time then one generally blame forces and everyone else on the payroll of foreign companies except for owning up the ones own mistakes.

country cant send its forces to war with unreliable weapons.

 

[Markus]

Since LCA is the first attempt for India in the league of modern fighters and if the Air Force is not happy with the current configuration then we cannot ignore their worries since ultimately its them who will have to use this machine in the event of a war.

Now, all we can do is try and refine Tejas and bring it to standards that are acceptable to the air force.

 

[notsuperstitious]

When one cant make a decent fighter even after spending lot of money and and time then one generally blame forces and everyone else on the payroll of foreign companies except for owning up the ones own mistakes.

country cant send its forces to war with unreliable weapons.

You are biased, obviously.

There are many in the forces who are happy with the product too, I personally know people who will be flying it.

The huge money and kickoffs involved and the corruption etc is not obvious to you, except when you want to use it to bash India. Then its all very clear eh?

 

[duhastmish]

When one cant make a decent fighter even after spending lot of money and and time then one generally blame forces and everyone else on the payroll of foreign companies except for owning up the ones own mistakes.

country cant send its forces to war with unreliable weapons.

but soldier's can atleast be proud of their bl00dy country, and accept whats ingeniousness or at least respect it.

these IAF people dont tell what they want they are so confused that -they never outline their requirement to scientific organizations.

anything which is bought through the $ is good because they get their commissons.

they dont ever show that they are proud of their own products. that makes it sad for whole country.

 

[ajtr]

You are biased, obviously.

There are many in the forces who are happy with the product too, I personally know people who will be flying it.

The huge money and kickoffs involved and the corruption etc is not obvious to you, except when you want to use it to bash India. Then its all very clear eh?

None are happy with failed LCA except with the HAL/ADA walas and indian internet chatterati for their bloated egos.LCA is a failed white elephant.period.

 

[Capt.Popeye]

None are happy with failed LCA except with the HAL/ADA walas and indian internet chatterati for their bloated egos.LCA is a failed white elephant.period.

Thus spake Gernail. Ajtr. The last word on military matters (and all matters).

 

[ajtr]

but soldier's can atleast be proud of their bl00dy country, and accept whats ingeniousness or at least respect it.

these IAF people dont tell what they want they are so confused that -they never outline their requirement to scientific organizations.

anything which is bought through the $ is good because they get their commissons.

they dont ever show that they are proud of their own products. that makes it sad for whole country.

No a soldier will feel sorry for a country for which he is dieing cant even provide a reliable weapon to fight.And forces have seen thousands of examples from PSU labs with its failed projects list for which is too long.

So better escape route is to blame forces for commission cuts in foreign weapons purchases.

 

[ajtr]

Thus spake Gernail. Ajtr. The last word on military matters (and all matters).

Kaptan must shut up when much higher rank jarnail is speaking

 

[duhastmish]

No a soldier will feel sorry for a country for which he is dieing cant even provide a reliable weapon to fight.And forces have seen thousands of examples from PSU labs with its failed projects list for which is too long.

So better escape route is to blame forces for commission cuts in foreign weapons purchases.

oh then the other nation soldiers will run a revolution against their own coutnries ????

you are such an smart a... dude , paksitan have lower budget and that makes their market a bit smaller and constrained compared to india.

so u mean to say they should stop defending their coutnry because they are not getting fancy toys ????

instead they - fullfill the void with the pride and ego they take in their product provided by their country,

stop whining all the time ...........

 

[lionheart1]

When one cant make a decent fighter even after spending lot of money and and time then one generally blame forces and everyone else on the payroll of foreign companies except for owning up the ones own mistakes.

country cant send its forces to war with unreliable weapons.

for your kind information , when f-16 first introduced in us-air force, it was called as widow maker , same euro fighter when first introduce didnt had bvr capability . this show improvement will not take place over night it is a continues process . believe me tajes will be upto the mark

 

[GUNS-N- ROSES]

govt of india will persist with LCA. it is in our own startegic interests to persist with lca. it miight not be the best fighter around. but it is still a decent fighter. watever lessons we learnt in LCA can be used to make AMCA.

it might be a three legged fighter(according to some) but i m sure we can use that three legged fighter to build a better fighter tomorrow.

 

[notsuperstitious]

None are happy with failed LCA except with the HAL/ADA walas and indian internet chatterati for their bloated egos.LCA is a failed white elephant.period.

One more false flag heard from. Period.