What's new

Tehreek-e-Taliban say no peace talks anytime soon

haviZsultan

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jul 30, 2007
Messages
9,045
Reaction score
36
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Arab Emirates
ISLAMABAD: The Pakistani Taliban say they will not change their decision of withdrawing peace talks offer to the government for now, as they are still mourning the killing of their deputy chief, Waliur Rehman Mehsud in a US drone strike.

Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) withdrew its dialogue offer to the new government a day after the TTP spokesperson Ehsanullah Ehsan confirmed on May 30th that Waliur Rehman Mehsud was killed in the US drone strike in North Waziristan tribal region, along with six other militants.

Ehsan had alleged Pakistan’s cooperation with the US in the drone attacks, an allegation he reiterated on Sunday when asked if the TTP is willing to talk to the PML-N government.

When questioned on Sunday if the PML-N government directly or through any mediator contacted the Taliban for talks, Ehsan said that no one has contacted them since the new government has taken over.

Interior Minister, Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan said in Quetta on Sunday that the government is ready to pursue its commitment to talk to those militants who want to talk. However he warned that the government will respond with force if the armed groups pursue ‘militancy and terrorism.’

The Taliban say they still standby their previous decision not to talk to the government.

“We are still in the state of shock at the martyrdom of our deputy chief and there is no change in decision of not to talk to the government,” the TTP spokesman told The Express Tribune.

The TTP had previously offered conditional peace talks to the PPP-led ruling coalition for the first time in February this year, however, then government wanted the Taliban to lay down arms first.

The Taliban had attached conditions to their talks offer that included release of their senior negotiators and proposed Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz president Nawaz Sharif, Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Fazl leader Maulana Fazlur Rehman and Jamaat-e-Islami amir Syed Munawar Hasan as guarantor for dialogue. None of the three leaders had agreed to play the mediator role, but had pressed the former PPP government to hold talks with the militants.

Days after the PML-N emerged as the single largest party in the May 11 elections, Nawaz Sharif had stated that he would take the Taliban dialogue offer very seriously. However, there has been no progress so far and the US drone attacks made the possibility complicated.

“We had offered dialogue and wanted to talk to everyone, but the political government has no power and the powerful establishment has never shown seriousness to peace dialogue,” Ehsan said via phone from undisclosed location.

To a question about the logic behind the Taliban decision to withdraw talks offer to the government in reaction to the US attack, he claimed that Taliban believe that “our state institutions are passing on 80 percent information to the Americans for drone attacks.”

To another questioned Ehsan said that the Taliban have appointed a new deputy chief but the name will not be disclosed for some time.
 
good news i wish this war over with full victory not semi
 
wrong attitude.. you cant stop terror by killing terrorists.. :no:
you need to change their minds and hearts.

laton ke bhoot baaton se nahin mante! Meaning: a person who can only understand the language of beatings cannot be counselled by words.
 
These sub human animals known as the Taliban have crippled us badly and are continuing to do so. I don't understand what solution will work. When we conduct military operations they run and hide anywhere else where operations aren't taking place. When we talk about talking peace with those cold hearted butchers the animals use it to gain and advantage over us in the war (Buner incursion of the Taliban)...

Pakistan must develop a solid policy to stop the terrorists and ensure their utter elimination. I don't know how this can be one but the state of my country depresses me very much.
 
wrong attitude.. you cant stop terror by killing terrorists.. :no:
you need to change their minds and hearts.

Ohhh.... using my own words against me? :P

I agree, you cannot kill an IDEOLOGY with guns, but a terrorist, yes you sure can, if you do it right.
SO far, PA has done it right, i would like to see it repeat it's success. As for the war against the ideology, that is a long term deal and on the ground PA runs rehabilitation projects, education and health facilities, that is a step forward. The very long term solution is an all party consensus along with the army and real development.

So I say again: Kill 'em all!
 
wrong attitude.. you cant stop terror by killing terrorists.. :no:
you need to change their minds and hearts.

That is provided those hearts and minds are worth winning. How can we win over a crazed ****** whose only mission is to cause havoc and bloodshed. The terrorists must be utterly vanquished for what they have done to our country. Down with the terrorists.
 
Ohhh.... using my own words against me? :P

I agree, you cannot kill an IDEOLOGY with guns, but a terrorist, yes you sure can, if you do it right.
SO far, PA has done it right, i would like to see it repeat it's success. As for the war against the ideology, that is a long term deal and on the ground PA runs rehabilitation projects, education and health facilities, that is a step forward. The very long term solution is an all party consensus along with the army and real development.

So I say again: Kill 'em all!

of course not.. its my own words. :cheesy:
There are too many 'terrorists', if you kill them all , there will be river of blood.
Negotiate with them without diluting basic principles, and use force only as a stop gap short term measure to protect rest of the people, not to eradicate them.
 
of course not.. its my own words. :cheesy:
There are too many 'terrorists', if you kill them all , there will be river of blood.
Negotiate with them without diluting basic principles, and use force only as a stop gap short term measure to protect rest of the people, not to eradicate them.

Negotiating from a Position of Weakness will not work .
 
Negotiating from a Position of Weakness will not work .

I am not against use of force, but it should for the right objective. Putting pressure on them to come to negotiating table is a good reason. Killing them all is not.
 
Good-riddance to these talks. They were never going to honor it. Instead they would have just come back after a break.
 
I am not against use of force, but it should for the right objective. Putting pressure on them to come to negotiating table is a good reason. Killing them all is not.

no just send them to hell :devil:

they will just keep stalling negotiations

Good-riddance to these talks. They were never going to honor it. Instead they would have just come back after a break.

and with more force and better prepared
we dont want that
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom