Sine Nomine
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2014
- Messages
- 10,067
- Reaction score
- 25
- Country
- Location
They are not a conventional force,nor they have been trained for pitched battles.Taliban stands no chance against NATO in the battlefield.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They are not a conventional force,nor they have been trained for pitched battles.Taliban stands no chance against NATO in the battlefield.
Taliban conduct hit-and-run operations to destabilize a region; NATO had stood its ground and fought well in any region where it has intervened since 2001. They have slaughtered thousands of Taliban combatants over the course of years and enabled Afghan government to exercise its control over 50% of the country. However, problem is that Afghan society is internally fractured beyond measure and in a perpetual state of war since a long time.
What is your defination of control?Didn't the viet don't use these tactics and win. All smaller armies that's don't have cover of air power or armour use these tactics. It's death by a 1000 cuts. If NATO is an great why do the Taliban control approx 70 percent of Afghanistan.b
I didn't say they control 70 percent. I international media did ask them for the definition and Google it
Vietcong was a massive force and very well armed in comparison to Taliban. Not a valid comparison.Didn't the viet don't use these tactics and win. All smaller armies that's don't have cover of air power or armour use these tactics. It's death by a 1000 cuts. If NATO is an great why do the Taliban control approx 70 percent of Afghanistan.b
Taliban is just a smokescreen for furiously independent Afghan tribes to resist the mandate of Afghan government in their respective domains. The original Taliban no longer exist.
Yet they beat the Soviets and hammering NATO since 2001. You just like talking reality is they are there and NATO can't defeat them. Thats a fact. Wrap it how you likeVietcong was a massive force and very well armed in comparison to Taliban. Not a valid comparison.
Taliban is just a smokescreen for furiously independent Afghan tribes to resist the mandate of Afghan government in their respective domains. The original Taliban no longer exist.
US (and Pakistan) made it possible for the so-called Mujahideen to defeat Soviet Union in Afghanistan (google 'Operation Cyclone'). However, US (and Pakistan) didn't realize at the time that they were creating a Frankenstein Monster which will turn rogue one day and find a way to subsist on its own. This Frankenstein Monster continue to draw recruits from all over the world to its cause which is baffling to say the least.Yet they beat the Soviets and hammering NATO since 2001. You just like talking reality is they are there and NATO can't defeat them. Thats a fact. Wrap it how you like
I cannot say for sure.@LeGenD Do you think NATO has desire to put Taliban down?
u.s killed thousands of civilians and claim they killed talibans.if they killed such numbers of taliban there would be no taliban resistance nowTaliban conduct hit-and-run operations to destabilize a region; NATO had stood its ground and fought well in any region where it has intervened since 2001. They have slaughtered thousands of Taliban combatants over the course of years and made it possible for the Afghan government to exercise its control over 50% of the country.
However, Afghan society is internally fractured beyond measure due to its tribal orientation and in a perpetual state of war since a long time. There is no solution for this tribalism.
Do you see any difference in Taliban and civilians? Taliban do not wear uniforms. Anybody can be Taliban in Afghanistan and Pakistan.u.s killed thousands of civilians and claim they killed talibans.if they killed such numbers of taliban there would be no taliban resistance now