What's new

Taliban announce cease-fire in Pakistan valley

fatman17

PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
Joined
Apr 24, 2007
Messages
32,563
Reaction score
98
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Taliban announce cease-fire in Pakistan valley

By NAHAL TOOSI, Associated Press Writer Nahal Toosi, Associated Press Writer – 17 mins ago

ISLAMABAD – The Taliban announced a 10-day cease-fire in Pakistan's Swat Valley on Sunday after freeing a Chinese hostage during peace talks with the government, while an abducted American threatened with imminent death by his kidnappers remained missing.

Past peace deals with militants, including in Swat, have failed. Any agreement this time could spark renewed U.S. criticism that peace talks merely give militants time to regroup and rearm.

Taliban spokesman Muslim Khan called the release of Chinese engineer Long Xiaowei a goodwill gesture as government officials and Taliban sympathizers said they had come to terms on introducing elements of an Islamic judicial system in Swat and surrounding areas.

"In view of these developments, we announce a unilateral cease-fire for 10 days, but we reserve the right to retaliate if we are fired upon," Khan told The Associated Press.

The Swat Valley was once a tourist haven and is now believed to be mostly under control of the militants, who have long demanded imposition of Islamic, or Shariah, law. Regaining Swat is a major test for Pakistan's shaky civilian government because, unlike the semiautonomous tribal regions along the Afghan border where al-Qaida and Taliban have long thrived, the valley is supposed to be fully under its control.

A string of recent attacks on foreigners — including the apparent beheading of a Polish geologist — have underscored the deteriorating security conditions.

On Friday, the kidnappers of American U.N. official John Solecki threatened to kill him within 72 hours and issued a 20-second video of the blindfolded captive saying he was "sick and in trouble."

U.N. officials said Sunday they were still trying to establish contact with the gunmen who seized Solecki on Feb. 2 in Quetta, a southwestern city near the Afghan border.

The kidnappers have identified themselves as members of the previously unknown Baluchistan Liberation United Front, indicating a link to separatists rather than to Islamists. The captors have demanded the release of 141 women allegedly detained in Pakistan, but Interior Ministry chief Rehman Malik has denied that the 141 are being held.

Baluchistan provincial government spokesman Syed Kamran said it was offering a $31,363 reward "for any information leading to the recovery of the kidnapped U.N. official."

Pakistani government officials could not immediately be reached for comment on the announced cease-fire. Officials would not comment on whether a ransom was paid or militants were freed in exchange for the Chinese engineer's release Saturday. Long's freedom was secured days before a planned visit to China by Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari.

___

Associated Press writers Henry Sanderson in Beijing, Riaz Khan in Peshawar and Habib Khan in Timar Garah contributed to this report.
 
This is another way of buying time nothing else from these barbarians and we should admit that PA is actualy failed to protect the swat ppl from their barbarics. Now I know that I will be getting so much bashing and criticism from my fellow Pakistan brothers, but we shoud admit that its a PA's one of the biggest failures.Unfortunatly.
 
Not understood..who is taliban to dictate terms like ' unilateral cease fire ' ?

Shouldn't it be the PA ?

the army is taking orders from the civilian govt. if the govt. says they are going to negotiate with the taliban (right or wrong is not the issue here) then the army has to abide. isnt this what all pakistanis want. the army taking dictation from the civilian govt.s political decisions.
 
This is another way of buying time nothing else from these barbarians and we should admit that PA is actualy failed to protect the swat ppl from their barbarics. Now I know that I will be getting so much bashing and criticism from my fellow Pakistan brothers, but we shoud admit that its a PA's one of the biggest failures.Unfortunatly.

you have a right to your viewpoint but obviously i dont agree with your assessment.

1. bajaur was in a similar predicament before the army action. now there are only pockets of resistance in bajaur, areas where the militants are dug-in protecting their "last bastions" like drug labs etc. the militants tried to takeover mohmand and dir and were un-successful because of resistance by the locals and the army. the majority has now fled to N and S waziristan for the battles to come.
2. swat is more difficult because of the population demographics. lot more people in swat and more towns and villages than bajaur and other agencies. so the army has to tread carefully. already the media is crying hoarse over the collateral losses in swat valley. further the media is promoting the notion that if sharia law is enforced because the people want it in the malakand division including swat then everything will be normal "just-like-that". and it is obvious that the local ANP govt and the civilian govt. has fallen for this trap. the army will do what it is asked to do - nothing more, nothing less -
 
There is tremendous outcry over provincial autonomy in Pakistan - we have a nationalist (relatively liberal and secular party) demanding talks and arguing for the implementation of this Shariah Bill.

Given the points Fatman sahib raised regarding the sentiment in Pakistan, and Swat especially, over the military operation and collateral damage, I don't think the militayr or GoP have much choice but to agree with this proposal.

Is there a chance it will fail? Yes, absolutely, becasue first the TTP-S have to agree with the document that has been presented, and then disarm. I think the disarming part will be extremely hard.

Education for women etc. - there are a lot of potential issues that I do not see the hard line TTP members accepting.

We need to look at the five point agreement and the details of this 'Shairah Bill' to see what it means.
 
There is tremendous outcry over provincial autonomy in Pakistan - we have a nationalist (relatively liberal and secular party) demanding talks and arguing for the implementation of this Shariah Bill.

Given the points Fatman sahib raised regarding the sentiment in Pakistan, and Swat especially, over the military operation and collateral damage, I don't think the militayr or GoP have much choice but to agree with this proposal.

Is there a chance it will fail? Yes, absolutely, becasue first the TTP-S have to agree with the document that has been presented, and then disarm. I think the disarming part will be extremely hard.

Education for women etc. - there are a lot of potential issues that I do not see the hard line TTP members accepting.

We need to look at the five point agreement and the details of this 'Shairah Bill' to see what it means.

this will open a pandoras box as other divisions or provinces wanting their "own" systems of justice aka malakand and swat. the constitution becomes "null and void"

the swat situation is different in the sense that the wali of swat had his own system of justice (adal) and it seems that the people of swat were very happy with the dispensation of justice, which the people feel will bring peace.
 
It is being sold as Nifaz e Adl - and as such it is more than 2 decades old.

Rationale: It will be claimed that the locals object to the length of time it takes to get a judgement under the Pakistani Judicial system and that the locals are used to and want speedy justice.
Recall Mr. Musharraf's promise of speedy justice.

Where have we see such a thing before??

Well, One China two systems?? Hong Kong?


Yes, well, that's the way it is to sold -- it's rubbish and a beginning of a sell out to the Talib. A state without will.
 
Implementation of the Sharia bill would be a catastrophic mistake.

They will carry on, and then demand the same for other areas of nwfp, baluchistan, punjab, etc. These militants will not remain quiet until they have established their writ over the whole of Pakistan. They are in this for the long run.

These peace deals tend to work in their favour.

We can make deals with those taliban who are ideologically opposed to overthrowing the govt.

We should also engage other groups like hizb and lashkar, which are at ideological odds with the TTP. Not all islamists, or fundamentalists are the same. We must learn to differentiate among them, and isolate the hard core miscreants.
 
at this time TTP is not part of the deal so to speak - the deal for justice is with maulana sufi, who it is claimed does not have a armed lashkar (force)
 
Implementation of the Sharia bill would be a catastrophic mistake.

They will carry on, and then demand the same for other areas of nwfp, baluchistan, punjab, etc. These militants will not remain quiet until they have established their writ over the whole of Pakistan. They are in this for the long run.

These peace deals tend to work in their favour.

We can make deals with those taliban who are ideologically opposed to overthrowing the govt.

We should also engage other groups like hizb and lashkar, which are at ideological odds with the TTP. Not all islamists, or fundamentalists are the same. We must learn to differentiate among them, and isolate the hard core miscreants.

DS all these groups have to be dis-armed. this should be the primary condition.
 
sharia movement in swat is olders than this taliban thing. this movement have got backin of ppl of swat. its not lik FATA or any other part of pakhtonkwa. talibans and other groups are using this umberalla to achieve their own objectives by creatin chaos. once sharia is implemented, ppl and espacially elders will have no reason to oppose Gov and will make it a lot easier to clean the area from talibans etc.
 
A pro-Taliban armed group has agreed to a 10-day ceasefire with the Pakistani government in the country's northwestern Swat Valley region.

The regional government of North West Frontier Province (NWFP) has been holding negotiations with Maulana Sufi Muhammad, who heads the Tahrik-e-Nifaz Shariat Muhammadi group.

Al Jazeera has learned that Sharia (Islamic law) - one of the group's main demands - would be introduced in both Swat Valley and Malakand district as part of the deal.

Muhammad said a five-member delegation of his group would meet NWFP's chief minister in the provincial capital Peshawar on Monday to continue peace negotiations.

Al Jazeera English - CENTRAL/S. ASIA - Truce agreed in Pakistan's Swat

THis proves 1000000000% GOP is behind Talibans and these Terorist have the backing of GOP nothing more every thing else is a Lie.
 
Back
Top Bottom