T-80 and T-84 Main Battle Tanks Information pool

[HRK]

was the contract that big?


dude why t80 contract was called contract of century

not that big only 320 in numbers ... but the timing of the contract was more important .... & if I am not wrong that was the first export of T-80UD from Ukraine that too at the much need time for the Ukrainian Tank Industry

 

[T-55]

Hi when they have been tested? 1995 that's what the pictures says

Yes pictures are from 1995 tests,Google translate from link:
A small selection of photographs taken during tests of tanks T-80UD and type 85 in the Thar desert, carried out within the framework of the tender for the main battle tank of the Pakistan Army; 1995 Year

 

[Gryphon]

Tests of Pakistan appointed in 2017. By this time KMDB should make all voiced wishes for tank construction T-84 BM Oplot-P.

You mean Oplot modified for Pak requirements ?

 

[Glavcom]

You mean Oplot modified for Pak requirements ?

Yes

 

[Dazzler]

Who can say what Pakistan need a T-84 MBT-3000 or if he produces Pakistan Al-Khalid tank?

Alkhalid series is going nowhere and will see more development in coming years. The Al haider mbt (whatever system is chosen under it) will complement the Alkhalid 1 and soon the Alkhalid 2, and will likely replace the 59s, 69s and perhaps some Alzarrars.

From what I've read the Oplot would bring increased crew protection through seperate ammo compartments/bustle loaded ammo and blow out panels.

These are lacking in every Pakistani MBT at present.

Oplot doesn't have a separate ammo compartment either. They have the same autoloader as UD. Only yatagan, T-72-120 and T-55AG are offered with the option of a bustle mounted autolader.

 

[Glavcom]

Alkhalid series is going nowhere and will see more development in coming years. The Al haider mbt (whatever system is chosen under it) will complement the Alkhalid 1 and soon the Alkhalid 2, and will likely replace the 59s, 69s and perhaps some Alzarrars.

Good. What are the main conceptual differences between Al-Khayder from Al Khalid. And Al Haider from Al Khalid 2? The main mission of Al-Hyder

 

[Dazzler]

Good. What are the main conceptual differences between Al-Khayder from Al Khalid. And Al Haider from Al Khalid 2? The main mission of Al-Hyder

To standardize the overall capability of entire mbt fleet. The Al Haider being an imported system will be of secondary importance which is not the case with Al khalid series.

 

[Glavcom]

Well, what role does the armed forces of Pakistan have from the very beginning on T-80UD, what are the main differences and similarities with the role of Al-Khalid MK.1?

The Al Haider being an imported system will be of secondary importance which is not the case with Al khalid series.

The point is to buy an armament system so that it has a secondary role in front of Al Khalid.

 

[Dazzler]

Well, what role does the armed forces of Pakistan have from the very beginning on T-80UD, what are the main differences and similarities with the role of Al-Khalid MK.1?



The point is to buy an armament system so that it has a secondary role in front of Al Khalid.

You don't get it don't you?

Read the post again. The idea is to get the obsolete fleet replaced with a quality weapon system. its called the systems approach. In the meantime, learning and adapting quality features from these weapon systems also continues. The multiple reverse speed transmission (t-84), powerful FCS with autotracking, hunter killer mode, panoramic sight, and battle management systems (leclerc, m1axx, Leopard2xx and so on) in Al khalid tank are prime examples of this approach.

 

[Glavcom]

 

[Glavcom]

 

[Glavcom]

 

[Glavcom]

 

[HRK]

 

[Glavcom]