Saif al-Arab
BANNED
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2015
- Messages
- 8,873
- Reaction score
- 5
- Country
- Location
Arabs annexed Persia back in the 600s without much difficulty. They could have done it again in the 1980s. Had they continued for 10 more years, they could have done so.
LOL.
And why should Iraq have done that? If all Arab states ganged up on Iran with Iraq, Iran would have fallen relatively easily indeed (due to huge disproportion in population, economic power, resources). Same situation today (even more so). However for what reason exactly?
Saddam was only interested in the Arab-inabhited Al-Ahwaz/Khuzestan were all Iran's oil and gas is (almost) located. Rest was of no strategic value. Deserts and mountains?
Ironically Iranian Arabs (Shia Islamists in particular) were the first line of defense for Iran. Despite this they face visible discrimination and despite living in the richest part of Iran, basic services are lacking due to the trashy Mullah regime.
Southwest Iran is the hottest region in the world during the summer.
Oh common:
مرکز پژوهشهای مجلس طی گزارشی اذعان کرده که ۷۰درصد زنان جامعه به حجاب شرعی اعتقاد ندارند و تلقی عمومی از حجاب نیز جنبه عرفی دارد.
http://abanpress.ir/social/19510/1397/05/07
About Saoshyant there are different interpretations and you should be critical of young avestan texts, let alone stuff added to zoroastrianism during the sassanids or even after Islam, which has 1700-2700 years distance from original zoroastrianism!
Well I think it's too late to talk about ideologies at this critical moment in Iran. Iran is more important at the moment. If you want to divide the nation, you can talk about real islam or any other ideology (real communism) etc. Just be Iranian first then anything else, whatever that is. A radical change is needed, but we're saying this at least in the last 20 years. No one listened, people were opressed, critics were neglected and even worse labled as "anti revolution/anti islam".
Now that the country is boiling from inside the turban wearing grandfathers come with baby steps: reporting about hijab, saying musavi and karoubi will be freed, saying that they arrested corrupt people (still no names!).
NO BABY STEPS/cosmetic changes will change nothing, it's too late. Either take extreme/radical steps or bring the country to risk of collapsing, whatever follows only God knows.
I told everyone here the main problem is the guardian council and banning of candidates based on non-islamist ideology and disconnections with the ruling clerical elite and the old revolutionaries. If you don't allow capable people to enter the parliament then only incapable people will enter! and you see the results. If you don't allow free press to act as watchdog against thieves and corruption you will see the results. If you don't allow the judiciary be independent from Islamists, you see them keeping their hands of corrupt friends and then again you see the results.
IMF (islamist forum) banned me, even here islamist oriented moderators could not tolerate this information.
Are you a Zoroastrian? Maybe us Semitic pagans and Zoroastrians should form some kind of cooperation council.
Last edited: