What's new

Syrian government no longer controls 83% of the country

Zarvan

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
54,470
Reaction score
87
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Syria_-_main.jpg

The Syrian government lost 18 per cent of its territory between January and August 2015. Credit: IHS Conflict Monitor
Territory fully controlled by President Assad’s forces has shrunk by 18% between 1 January and 10 August 2015 to 29,797 km2, roughly a sixth of the country, according to the latest data insights produced by IHS Conflict Monitor.

In a recently televised speech, President Assad admitted it was necessary to focus on holding certain areas of greater strategic importance, while sacrificing others. The key areas which Assad cannot afford to lose include the capital Damascus, the Alawite coastal provinces of Latakia and Tartous, and the city of Homs as the vital connection between them. These are likely to be defended, even at the expense of losing other major cities like Aleppo or Dar’a.

Assad also stated that manpower shortages were the greatest challenge to the government’s war effort. The Syrian Army is believed to have lost around 50% of its pre-war strength of 300,000. Many of the remaining soldiers are very young Alawite conscripts, sent to the front lines with minimal training and low morale.

For more than a year, the government has been carrying out spot checks on young men in the streets of Alawite cities, according to an IHS source in Latakia. Those unable to provide a valid exemption from service are immediately detained and enrolled in the army.

A day before his speech, President Assad issued a pardon to anyone who had evaded military service, on the condition that they enrol or re-join the army. This indicates that the government no longer has the capacity to replace soldiers killed or wounded with Syrians, and will become even more reliant on foreign fighters to bolster its ranks.

Increased territorial losses suffered by the government since March 2015 are most likely a direct result of Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Qatar stepping up their support for Sunni groups, and creating new powerful coalitions such as Jaysh al-Fatah.

However, there is another factor which is likely to drive further government losses over the coming months. The Islamic State is seeking to expand operations in western Syria, and extend its territorial control from the recently seized Palmyra area to the Lebanese border.

Islamic State fighters crossed from Lebanon on 20 July, seizing control from Hizbullah and Syrian government forces in the mountainous Tallat Na’imat area, near the border south of Homs. They have since used the area to besiege the Syrian Army's 67th Brigade base, which lies adjacent to the M5 highway, the main transport link between Damascus and the city of Homs. The Islamic State is also approaching the same area from the east, where it took control of Qariyatayn on 5 August.

Due to its key strategic significance, government forces will most likely redeploy significant resources from other front lines to the M5 highway, in order to prevent the remaining government-held areas in western Syria from being divided.

Even if government forces are successful in defending their core territory against the Islamic State, it will probably come at the expense of losing further territory on the periphery in the coming weeks and months, most likely including the southern city of Dar’a.

The IHS Conflict Monitor records about 1,000 manually geocoded indicator events for Syria and Iraq every week from social media and other open sources, feeding into a dataset that reaches back to January 2014. The Monitor includes regular analysis of the data by IHS experts, delivering unique insight into the tactics, activities and capabilities of armed actors, as well as mapping the progression of the conflict in unprecedented detail.




(582 words)

Syrian government no longer controls 83% of the country - IHS Jane's 360
 
. . .
Sometimes its a war strategy to let enemy on foot come real close before its wiped out from behind and corndered from both side
 
. . .
It still controls the country's "core territory" i.e the SW and the area along the Mediterranean. The eastern half of Syria is a sparsely populated desert which has no real value really other than palmyra and deir ez zor. Either way the stalemate seems to continue.

Pakistan should support the Syrian rebels . militarily and politically.

and why would we do that. If anything ISIS is a threat to Pakistan as well and we should actually support the regime or just stay neutral.
 
. .
Same story in israel , if you exclude the deserts , most palestinians still own the grasslands
 
. .
I think it's sad that Palmyra has fallen , but i'm personally glad , not that i'm a muslim fanatic like ISIS ,

but years ago i was the member of an iranian defence forum similar to this very website (along with 500) and there existed a palestinian too who we supported , but still was very anti-persian , he said he praised the Roman empire for their wars with iran , if that's the attitude in arabia , i guess us the persians must be glad that Palmyra (a Roman site) was blown up , indeed prophet muhammed (PBUH) has a Surah in which he praises the Romans and belittles persians , so that must be their guidline in the arab world
 
.
First biggest city Damascus, half of the second biggest city Aleppo, third biggest city Homs, fourth biggest city Hama and the vital coastal area are all under bad Assadists control.
 
.
Syria is mainly desert so I don't think this statement is very accurate
 
. . .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom