What's new

Syrian Civil War (Graphic Photos/Vid Not Allowed)

. . . . . . .
Well, considering your state of mind and support for Assad...I'd actually say that's a compliment. But I have to be "politically correct" here.
What happened to your democracy? Where you accept others point or view? Oh wait no such thing...
@waz
 
. . .
What happened to your democracy? Where you accept others point or view? Oh wait no such thing...
@waz
I don't accept other's points of view when they support a genocidal mass-murdering maniac.
I took into account your point of view, never accepted it. That's democracy.
 
.
I don't accept other's points of view when they support a genocidal mass-murdering maniac.
I took into account your point of view, never accepted it. That's democracy.
Yeah democracy is you respect others opinion and etc... But again no such thing exists...
I can say the same thing about you, but I won't get down to your level, you will probably best me with your expierence:partay:
 
.
You can't just throw stuff like that here without evidence... Next time your gonna say Alasad sunk the titanic then, and you will say I lost the link or couldn't find it..
There's pro-Assad articles on other sites that you claim are "anti-Syria," for example the guardian: Most Syrians back President Assad – but you'd never know from western media | Jonathan Steele | Comment is free | The Guardian

Yeah democracy is you respect others opinion and etc... But again no such thing exists...
I can say the same thing about you, but I won't get down to your level, you will probably best me with your expierence
No such thing exists?
Well, I guess you've never head of Sweden, Norway, Finland, etc. Opinions are respected, but not adhered to. And I've already debunked almost all of your pro-Assad positions, you just refuse to accept that.
 
.
There's pro-Assad articles on other sites that you claim are "anti-Syria," for example the guardian: Most Syrians back President Assad – but you'd never know from western media | Jonathan Steele | Comment is free | The Guardian
That's the Guardian, not aljazeera

BTW thanks for the link, even western media admits Alasad had the majority of Syrians support...

No such thing exists?
Well, I guess you've never head of Sweden, Norway, Finland, etc. Opinions are respected, but not adhered to. And I've already debunked almost all of your pro-Assad positions, you just refuse to accept that.
Sweden don't have terrorists killing it's own people daily and asking the west or east to invade their country
 
.
That's the Guardian, not aljazeera

BTW thanks for the link, even western media admits Alasad had the majority of Syrians support...

[QUOTE="Dr.Thrax, post: 6784701, member: 164872"

No such thing exists?
Well, I guess you've never head of Sweden, Norway, Finland, etc. Opinions are respected, but not adhered to. And I've already debunked almost all of your pro-Assad positions, you just refuse to accept that.
Sweden don't have terrorists...[/QUOTE]
I told you, couldn't find the article on Al Jazeera, but other news sources have the same thing: It's an opinion article. Not what the news networks represents necessarily.
No terrorists in Sweden? Well, the 3 mosques burned down there aren't terror attacks I guess...

Plus, what does free speech have to do with "terrorism?" Free speech can exist where terrorism exists....example: France. Charlie Hebdo attack was a terrorist attack (although I hate the magazine and their work.) But obviously, the free speech there is biased. Sweden, again, is an example.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom