Syrian Civil War (Graphic Photos/Vid Not Allowed)

[Dr.Thrax]

lol
Iran and Syria are the best of friends and allies, and this will be the case in the next 100 years and beyond.

Keep dreaming. We will crush you at the bottom of our feet, but I don't think our boots even want such filth on them.

 

[ResurgentIran]

Keep dreaming. We will crush you at the bottom of our feet, but I don't think our boots even want such filth on them.

 

[Pak-Americanos]

Yeah that what was said 4 years ago.
Meanwhile:

Your a fool and buffoon, you created Millions of Sunni Syrians inside of Syria and outside of Syria(Who are the Majority off Syrians) your enemies for Generations and Generations to come. They have noting but hatred for Iranians, Shias, and Persians and it will exist in their hearts for next 1,000 years. You saved the a$$ of one clown?! Thats a great achievement.

Not to mention the billions of Muslims watching from the sidelines.

 

[ResurgentIran]

Your a fool and buffoon, you created Millions of Sunni Syrians inside of Syria and outside of Syria(Who are the Majority off Syrians) your enemies for Generations and Generations to come. They have noting but hatred for Iranians, Shias, and Persians and it will exist in their hearts for next 1,000 years. You saved the a$$ of one clown?! Thats a great achievement.

Not to mention the billions of Muslims watching from the sidelines.

 

[1000]

Ba'ath ideology has nothing to do with Sunni Islam. It's a secular ideology to begin with. A nationalistic and socialistic ideology too. The Ba'ath party under the dictatorship of the Al-Assad family has been dominated by Alawis who nobody outside of themselves consider as Muslims. They worship Ali ibn Abi Talib (ra) as their Prophet.

@rmi5 even told me that the Mullah's of Iran did never consider them as Muslims let alone Shia's until this conflict. He mentioned the names of leading Mullah's in Iran with this opinion and showed links. Banned now but as soon as he returns he will confirm this.

Similarily in Iraq there were more Shia Ba'ath party members than Sunnis. It's factually wrong to equal Ba'athism with Sunni Arabs. Even the founder of the Ba'ath ideology was a Syrian Christian Arab. Let us not bullshitt here more than necessary.

Of course this conflict has a sectarian dimension. Anyone claiming the opposite is joking.

Anti-Al-Asshead Syrians are in the vast majority. Especially in the diaspora. He has lost all legitimacy and needs to go. Along with his regime. How can any sane person even question this?

Also stop pfucking equaliing Al-Asshead's removal with Daesh rule. That's what Al-Asshead propagandists do 24/7 already. No, Syria will be ruled by moderate Syrian Sunni Arab Muslims who are in the majority. Just like Iraq which is currently dominated by Shia Arabs who are the majority.

I didn't say Ba'ath ideology = Islam or Sunnism. My reply is to Dr Thrax calling Alawites having a war-like culture. It's not them being Alawite, the ba'ath ideology is like that and you can see that in Iraq as well where the leader ( Saddam ) was Sunni. Turning the conflict sectarian has brought Islamists wanting to kill Alawites / Shias and impose their dirty rules.

Moderate opposition is past time anyway, FSA is even working with Nusra suicide bombers so it won't work, not working with SAA is no option.

 

[al-Hasani]

I didn't say Ba'ath ideology = Islam or Sunnism. My reply is to Dr Thrax calling Alawites having a war-like culture. It's not them being Alawite, the ba'ath ideology is like that and you can see that in Iraq as well where the leader ( Saddam ) was Sunni. Turning the conflict sectarian has brought Islamists wanting to kill Alawites / Shias and impose their dirty rules.

Moderate opposition is past time anyway, FSA is even working with Nusra suicide bombers so it won't work, not working with SAA is no option.

Actually he is right about the Alawis. You should read about them and the environment they live in. They are much alike Druze people.

Many people say that Alawis and Druzes are mainly descendants of Arab Lakhmids who ruled Southern and Central Iraq before Prophet Muhammad (saws). For instance the royal family (Arslan) of the Druze trace their ancestry to the Lakhmid Kings.

Lakhmids - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

They originally came from Yemen almost 2000 years ago.

Meanwhile most Syrian Sunni Arabs were regular townspeople or farmers/peasants. With a significant minority of rural Bedouins/semi-Bedouins in Eastern and Southern Syria.

It works both ways as the Al-Assad regime to begin with was a sectarian regime to a great extend. Just like Saddam. Just because the state was secular officially (still Islamic law was applied in both countries and most of the jurisprudence also derives from Islam or Islamic traditions - check it out yourself) it means little. Similar story in Iraq.

No, it's not as the vast majority of the 20 million or so Syrian Sunni Arabs are moderate Muslims. Some have been radicalized due to the conflict but only drunk people believe that Daesh or Al-Nusra have a future as representatives of Syria as a state if it will remain a state to begin with.

SSA is not a problem. Most SSA soldiers are forced to fight. Al-Asshead's regime relies heavily on foreigners and you will not find many volunteers from majority Sunni Arab provinces in Syria. Let alone the Kurds who constitute between 5-10% of Syria's population.

In every Al-Asshead controlled town and village people that can bear arms are forced/pressured to join the Al-Asshead regime. Hence all of the desertions. Even today you still hear about instances of this.

The exception being Damascus. Also it's correct that the Daesh retards and their presence have turned a lot of Sunni Arabs to join Al-Assheads regime because they were/are fighting a bigger enemy/cancer in the form of Daesh. That does not make them Al-Asshead regime fanboys.

If I was based in Damascus (regime controlled) and I had to choose between fighting for Al-Asshead or Daesh I would choose Al-Asshead too.

I have spoken to many Syrians that are currently based in Syria and they agree with my views on this front and confirm it themselves.

Visit the most common Arab chats if you want to have direct contact with total strangers.

Anyway anyone can form their own opinions. I know where I stand and that's with the majority of the Syrian people who don't wan't neither Daesh/Al-Nusra genocidal maniacs or the Al-Asshead genocidal dictatorship.

 

[1000]

SSA is not a problem. Most SSA soldiers are forced to fight. Al-Asshead's regime relies heavily on foreigners and you will not find many volunteers from majority Sunni Arab provinces in Syria. Let alone the Kurds who constitute between 5-10% of Syria's population.

The exception being Damascus. Also it's correct that the Daesh retards and their presence have turned a lot of Sunni Arabs to join Al-Assheads regime because they were fighting a bigger enemy/cancer. That does not make them Al-Asshead regime fanboys.

If I was based in Damascus (regime controlled) and I had to choose between fighting for Al-Asshead or Daesh I would choose Al-Asshead too.

I have spoken to many Syrians that are currently based in Syria and they agree with my views on this front and confirm it themselves.

Visit the most common Arab chats if you want to have direct contact with total strangers.

Not Assad fanboys but SAA, you can remove the leader but SAA won't be defeated in Syria with the current situation. And many Sunnis are on the SAA side as you just said thanks to ISIS, many lost hope in the idea of a revolution. All you need to do is look at the maps of Syria, you'd see FSA was way larger a couple years back, not only did ISIS take land from them SAA did as well. We're not in 2012 anymore to fall for Aroor BS that SAA are Alawites.

Also ISIS is mainly on the Eastern side of Syria, it's not in Damascus or the west which is mostly SAA controlled and Sunni majority as well, they have no ISIS to fear.

 

[elszADaQ]

The Baath the SSNP in Syria are just fronts for minorities to have a political structure hiding behind false secularism.Those Minorities are all asking for the majority to be secular while they retain their peculiar sect based identity. You cannot have it both ways. Either it is a system based on democracy and equality under the law and without consideration of privileged status for a peculiar sect or you remain sect based system.

 

[Syrian Lion]

Not Assad fanboys but SAA, you can remove the leader but SAA won't be defeated in Syria with the current situation. And many Sunnis are on the SAA side as you just said thanks to ISIS, many lost hope in the idea of a revolution. All you need to do is look at the maps of Syria, you'd see FSA was way larger a couple years back, not only did ISIS take land from them SAA did as well. We're not in 2012 anymore to fall for Aroor BS that SAA are Alawites.

Also ISIS is mainly on the Eastern side of Syria, it's not in Damascus or the west which is mostly SAA controlled and Sunni majority as well, they have no ISIS to fear.

Ignore them, they don't know Syria, they are still stuck in Sunni - Shia conflict mind set... Those people will never advance in their life,.. They want to take Syria 1000 years back... And of course Syrians will not allow them... We will fight those Israeli terrorists until Syria is clean again and peace is restored...

 

[jamahir]

Al-Asshead's regime relies heavily on foreigners

i don't understand your hate for bashar al-assad... is it because 10,000 others hate him so you automatically are 10,001... is it because of the political system in syria??

 

[al-Hasani]

Not Assad fanboys but SAA, you can remove the leader but SAA won't be defeated in Syria with the current situation. And many Sunnis are on the SAA side as you just said thanks to ISIS, many lost hope in the idea of a revolution. All you need to do is look at the maps of Syria, you'd see FSA was way larger a couple years back, not only did ISIS take land from them SAA did as well. We're not in 2012 anymore to fall for Aroor BS that SAA are Alawites.

Also ISIS is mainly on the Eastern side of Syria, it's not in Damascus or the west which is mostly SAA controlled and Sunni majority as well, they have no ISIS to fear.

The current SSA is nothing more than an extension of the Al-Asshead terror regime. It does not represent Syria or Syrians. Most Sunni Arabs who fight for SSA are from Damascus or were forced to fight for Al-Asshead under threats or due to enforced conscription. Since the conflict began over 100.000 SSA soldiers have deserted. Vast majority Sunni Arabs. It speaks for itself.

Also most of the SSA soldiers are not the problem as I already wrote. It's the regime that is the problem and they control SSA as usual.

FSA and the SSA have also held peace talks with shows that they are capable of talk. FSA's and the legitimate Syrian opposition's problem is the regime (the few hundred people with power). Not the ordinary Syrian. Hence you don't see FSA barrel bombing pro-regime cities or massacring people like Al-Asshead has been doing for years now.

FSA has been advancing in Southern Syria and had it not been for Daesh FSA would have controlled most of Syria. The areas that Daesh controls are anti Al-Asshad regime too.

i don't understand your hate for bashar al-assad... is it because 10,000 others hate him so you automatically are 10,001... is it because of the political system in syria??

You are really a clown. Yes, of course I have absolutely no problem with a regime that has killed almost 200.000 Syrians, which is engaged in genocide, which is barrel bombing whole cities, towns and villages, which is mass-executing people, destroying ancient Arab/Semitic heritage and which are mere puppets of the eternal enemies of the Arab world (fake wannabe Arab Mullah's and their Wilayat al-Faqih kufr) and who are mass-murdering fellow Arabs and Muslims.

In fact I don't understand how anyone can have a problem with Daesh either. After all they are doing the same just the other way around.

So using your logic why don't you support Al-Asshead and Daesh? After all it's the same coin. Just the opposite side. I don't support that currency to begin with.

 

[Alienoz_TR]

No, it's not a sectarian war. Just happens to be an Alawite-dominant military command, supported by a Shi'ite power (Iran), a Shi'ite militia (Hezbollah), with Shi'a from Iraq, Afghanistan and Alevis from Turkey all fighting to support Bashar al-Assad.

Let's all stop lying to each other, okay? Once we do that, maybe we can find a solution.

Afaik, from Turkey, only Arab Alawis joined the war. Under the name of Muqawama. Sunni Arabs with Turkish citizenship fight on the rebel side.

Alawi Kurds (Yezidi converts) fight on YPG side.

 

[Serpentine]

Turks were unarmed civilians; on the other side Iranians and Hezbollah members were in Syria to kill Syrians.

Israel used an oppurtunity to kill some of most wanted.

Mavi Marmara was on international waters. It is not the same. Iranian terrorists were in Syria and they don't have any business in Syria. They are there to kill Syrian people so Israel did the right thing.

If you consider them terrorists, I also consider those Turks as terrorists, since the word terrorism has became like a kid's toy these days that everyone can use.

And where are your videos and pictures of proof? The rebels stormed the hill and took it swiftly after inflicting heavy losses.

I reported what I saw from various reliable sources, it may or may have not been happened, but your video also does NOT prove that many of them were not killed. So let's just wait for more details to come out.

 

[1000]

The current SSA is nothing more than an extension of the Al-Asshead terror regime. It does not represent Syria or Syrians. Most Sunni Arabs who fight for SSA are from Damascus or were forced to fight for Al-Asshead under threats or due to enforced conscription. Since the conflict began over 100.000 SSA soldiers have deserted. Vast majority Sunni Arabs. It speaks for itself.

Also most of the SSA soldiers are not the problem as I already wrote. It's the regime that is the problem with controls SSA as usual.

The soldiers deserting were mainly during the start, everyone in the country was conscripted (except Kurds). They deserted as many were optimistic but this time is long gone with the arrival of Islamists. So yes like you said, SAA are not the problem and fighting them isn't going to solve much as we've see for the last years. FSA being Islamized and working with Nusra doesn't make their image any better to Sunnis on the SAA side. Nusra-ISIS, few differences after all, who knows Nusra will explode on the rest of the FSA one day. The US is bombing them whilst helping FSA, might create tensions between them.

FSA has been advancing in Southern Syria and had it not been for Daesh FSA would have controlled most of Syria. The areas that Daesh controls are anti Al-Asshad regime.

But you have to talk about the real situation where ISIS did come and hijack things.

 

[Dr.Thrax]

If you consider them terrorists, I also consider those Turks as terrorists, since the word terrorism has became like a kid's toy these days that everyone can use.



I reported what I saw from various reliable sources, it may or may have not been happened, but your video also does NOT prove that many of them were not killed. So let's just wait for more details to come out.

There were many videos of Rebels using ATGMs, mortars, and tunnel bombs on the hill before taking it. That's plenty of casualties. And that leaves not many defenders to defend the hill.