What's new

Syrian Civil War (Graphic Photos/Vid Not Allowed)

Videos everyone can make. Here Pantsyr failed to lock on UAV 100 m from it:


:lol:




This coming from the Israelis which fired on a drone 3 times and failed all 3 times :lol:

The Pantsir also tracked the drone but you appearently missed that part. Most radars are generally designed and programmed to disregard such small objects as clutter. Speed is also factored into the equation, if an object travels below an established threshold then a radar ignores it as clutter such as a bird. Radars do not want to pick up such objects because it would distract from real priority targets.

That drone is also extremely small plastic and skelotonized its not like it is one solid metal object. The Pantsir has n your video also shot down a target drone that mimics cruise missiles.



Ancient F-4 that was just peacefully flying by. Wow what an achievement.



But, but, Russian air defense can't shoot anything down remember?



Half century ago. :lol: But then in 1982 Russian air defence were brutally gang banged.



The same air defendes that downed dozens of Israeli aircraft in prior wars? Syrian air defenses from Syria in 1982 dated back to the 1950s, congratulations! There is also a number of ways to destroy SAMs such as the use decoys. Hitting SAMs that fired off their missiles would hardly qualify as a brutal gang bang. A brutal gang bang would be what Israeli received in 2006 from Hezballah. Or the the Israeli "special forces" that got the crap beaten out of them by civilians :lol:

Means they could not even lock on Tomahawks.

Also Assad himself that more than 50 brand new Russian air defence systems. And they all failed.


Iran considers any attack against Syria an attack on itself

TEHRAN, Iran (AP) — Iran considers any attack against Syria an attack on itself, an advisor to the Islamic Republic's supreme leader was quoted as saying Saturday, the strongest warning to date by a top Iranian official that Tehran will use any available means to keep the regime of President Bashar Assad in power.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/iran-official-attack-syria-attack-us-090549157.html

That was said back in 2013. Since then Israel bombed Assadists dozens times and now USA. :lol:

They are good only in barrel bombing helpless civilians.


Where is the proof they tried locking onto those Tomahawks? You might want to research the flight path of those Tomahawks. Your own video that you posted showed a Pantsir destroying a cruise missile size drone.

Go play in the sand box or stick to something your good at like creating a fanboy rating for tanks :lol:
 
Recent cruise missiles attack ahas speeded up the conflict between USA,RUSSIA and ofcourse Iran is also concerned alot.
 
After vaunted S-400, S-300, Buks and Pantsyrs miserably failed against old subsonic Tomahawks Putin terrorists decided to take revenge on helpless Syrian civilians.



Putin terrorists keep attacks, frustrated by their missile defence impotence. Saraqib:

 
Putin terrorists keep attacks, frustrated by their missile defence impotence. Saraqib:



When did Russia attemp to fire at those cruise missiles? Where is the hard proof? Funny how Russian air defenses can shoot down supersonic missiles in tests and have shot down thousands of aircraft but can't lock on to a giant Tomahawk.

Trolls will be trolls.
 
This coming from the Israelis which fired on a drone 3 times and failed all 3 times :lol:
2 times. It was ancient Patriot which is not designed to fire at drones. And drone just briefly entered space.

The Pantsir also tracked the drone but you appearently missed that part. Most radars are generally designed and programmed to disregard such small objects as clutter. Speed is also factored into the equation, if an object travels below an established threshold then a radar ignores it as clutter such as a bird. Radars do not want to pick up such objects because it would distract from real priority targets.
It failed to track.

That drone is also extremely small plastic and skelotonized its not like it is one solid metal object. The Pantsir has n your video also shot down a target drone that mimics cruise missiles.
They wrapped it with foil, but still failed from 100 m. LOL

But, but, Russian air defense can't shoot anything down remember?
They can. Malaysian Boeing for example.

The same air defendes that downed dozens of Israeli aircraft in prior wars?
They shot some still lost all wars.

Syrian air defenses from Syria in 1982 dated back to the 1950s, congratulations!
No it was not. Actually Syrians got Kvadrats and Osas before the Warsaw pact countries.

There is also a number of ways to destroy SAMs such as the use decoys. Hitting SAMs that fired off their missiles would hardly qualify as a brutal gang bang. A brutal gang bang would be what Israeli received in 2006 from Hezballah. Or the the Israeli "special forces" that got the crap beaten out of them by civilians :lol:
Since 2006 Hezbies dont dare to attack Israel and instead kill Syrians.

Where is the proof they tried locking onto those Tomahawks? You might want to research the flight path of those Tomahawks. Your own video that you posted showed a Pantsir destroying a cruise missile size drone.

Go play in the sand box or stick to something your good at like creating a fanboy rating for tanks :lol:
Russians entered that war to protect Alawis. And now u say that their SAMs did not even try to protect them. WHy they brought them to Syria? WHat about dozens of Pantsyrs and Buks?
 
2 times. It was ancient Patriot which is not designed to fire at drones. And drone just briefly entered space.



And an Israeli jet also failed to shoot it down.





They wrapped it with foil, but still failed from 100 m. LOL




They wrapped the thin landing skids in foil. The rest was mostly plastic. The drone itself was very small and had very little surface area esspecially from the side.

What I said about how radars are designed to disregard small objects as clutter went way over your head.




No it was not. Actually Syrians got Kvadrats and Osas before the Warsaw pact countries.




Those are short and medium altitude SAMs both are completely outclassed by the S-300 which Syria did not have at the time.





Since 2006 Hezbies dont dare to attack Israel



Lol... okay, Hezballah has attacked Israel many times since 2006.

http://www.usnews.com/news/world/ar...hezbollah-tv-reports-attack-on-israeli-forces

And Israelis response is weak, prior to 2006 Israel used disproportionate force since then they know better.


Russians entered that war to protect Alawis. And now u say that their SAMs did not even try to protect them. WHy they brought them to Syria? WHat about dozens of Pantsyrs and Buks?





Those SAM were brought only after the incident with Turkey. Russia could have, for instance, easily shot down a Turkish aircraft like the Syrians did with a Pantsir in retaliation but they kept a cool head. If Russia decided not to retaliate against Turkey why would they target the US which never directly attacked Russia?

The Syrians do not control Russian air defenses inside Syria, those S-400, S-300s, Buks and Pantsirs are under Russian control and the most potent air defenses Syria has is the medium range Pantsir, that is if the Syrians even operate it 24 hours a day. Russians decide who if anyone the Syrian air defenses shoot at.
 
Putin terrorists keep attacks, frustrated by their missile defence impotence. Saraqib:


Very sad day happened this week for shithole called Israel. After attack on Syria aimed to support chemical terrorists and after Israel showed support for this attack Russia from now on will support all future efforts of Syria and Iran against Israel. Terrorist Netanyahu failed miserably with his "smart" policy of appeasing Putin while supporting terrorists in Syria at the same time.
The next democratic president after Trump will take much harsher policy towards Israel. It will be the time when this terrorist country could disappear finally.
 
Very sad day happened this week for shithole called Israel. After attack on Syria aimed to support chemical terrorists and after Israel showed support for this attack Russia from now on will support all future efforts of Syria and Iran against Israel. Terrorist Netanyahu failed miserably with his "smart" policy of appeasing Putin while supporting terrorists in Syria at the same time.
The next democratic president after Trump will take much harsher policy towards Israel. It will be the time when this terrorist country could disappear finally.
LOLZ. Russia just repeats stupid mistakes it did in 1980-es. Really guys u dont learn.

And an Israeli jet also failed to shoot it down.
No.


They wrapped the thin landing skids in foil. The rest was mostly plastic. The drone itself was very small and had very little surface area esspecially from the side.

What I said about how radars are designed to disregard small objects as clutter went way over your head.



Those are short and medium altitude SAMs both are completely outclassed by the S-300 which Syria did not have at the time.
These SAMS are especially designed to deal with cruise missiles. They faailed miserably.

Lol... okay, Hezballah has attacked Israel many times since 2006.

http://www.usnews.com/news/world/ar...hezbollah-tv-reports-attack-on-israeli-forces

And Israelis response is weak, prior to 2006 Israel used disproportionate force since then they know better.
LOL, U are going to tell me what happened there prior 2006? I served there. When there was suspicion that we killed little hezbies they fired dozens of mortars at Israeli positions. Now we killed samir kuntar and they responded with broking tire to vehicle. LOL.

Those SAM were brought only after the incident with Turkey. Russia could have, for instance, easily shot down a Turkish aircraft like the Syrians did with a Pantsir in retaliation but they kept a cool head. If Russia decided not to retaliate against Turkey why would they target the US which never directly attacked Russia?

The Syrians do not control Russian air defenses inside Syria, those S-400, S-300s, Buks and Pantsirs are under Russian control and the most potent air defenses Syria has is the medium range Pantsir, that is if the Syrians even operate it 24 hours a day. Russians decide who if anyone the Syrian air defenses shoot at.
And they failed.
 
Very sad day happened this week for shithole called Israel. After attack on Syria aimed to support chemical terrorists and after Israel showed support for this attack Russia from now on will support all future efforts of Syria and Iran against Israel. Terrorist Netanyahu failed miserably with his "smart" policy of appeasing Putin while supporting terrorists in Syria at the same time.
The next democratic president after Trump will take much harsher policy towards Israel. It will be the time when this terrorist country could disappear finally.
sad day?
The bad guys kill other bad guys and we eat popcorn in Israel,
What a sad day?
 
LOLZ. Russia just repeats stupid mistakes it did in 1980-es. Really guys u dont learn.


No.


They wrapped the thin landing skids in foil. The rest was mostly plastic. The drone itself was very small and had very little surface area esspecially from the side.

What I said about how radars are designed to disregard small objects as clutter went way over your head.




These SAMS are especially designed to deal with cruise missiles. They faailed miserably.


LOL, U are going to tell me what happened there prior 2006? I served there. When there was suspicion that we killed little hezbies they fired dozens of mortars at Israeli positions. Now we killed samir kuntar and they responded with broking tire to vehicle. LOL.


And they failed.


It's clear you are a troll and conspiracy nut. You have zero facts and are a waste of everyone's time. Every piece of evidence I provide to you is just disregarded. There are dozens of videos of Russian SAMs that destroy targets the size of cruise missiles while you can provide zero evidence for your stupid claims. Go play in your sandbox and take some medications.
 
Last edited:
@500 you need to accept that what @ptldM3 is saying on the issue of Russian AD in syria is true. Do you ever read around on the internet about a certain issue? There is info out there now stating Russian govt made a political decision not to militarily counter US' recent missile attack in Syria. As for actual military capability, offcourse those systems could down the tomahawks. In reality, lets be honest, Israel, US, Gulf petro-kingdoms are still at a disadvantage in Syria. Many of these attacks(esp. by Israel and US) have not change the balance of power in Syria. Like it or not, advantage is still on Assad's side, for now at least.
 
@500 you need to accept that what @ptldM3 is saying on the issue of Russian AD in syria is true. Do you ever read around on the internet about a certain issue? There is info out there now stating Russian govt made a political decision not to militarily counter US' recent missile attack in Syria. As for actual military capability, offcourse those systems could down the tomahawks.
Currently we have in Syria:

S-400 Russian battery.
S-300V Russian battery.
Number of Russian Pantsyrs.
36 Assad Pantsyrs.
18 Assad Buk M2.
Number of newly modernized Pechoras.
And swarms of older systems SA-6, SA-3, S-200, Shilka, Osa...

And all that miserably failed vs. subsonic unstealthy Tomahawks.
1) There was prior warning of several hours.
2) There was no jamming.
3) There were no decoys.
4) There were no anti radiation missiles.

And still they miserably failed.

In reality, lets be honest, Israel, US, Gulf petro-kingdoms are still at a disadvantage in Syria. Many of these attacks(esp. by Israel and US) have not change the balance of power in Syria. Like it or not, advantage is still on Assad's side, for now at least.
Here what we have in Syria:

On one hand:

1) Assad army with 5000 tanks, hundreds jets, hundreds helicopters, thousands pieces of artillery, BMP, BTR,.
2) Armed to teeth Hezbollah terrorists.
3) Armed to teeth Russian air force units.
4) Armed to teeth Russian army and SF units.
5) Armed to teeth Russian mercenary units.
6) Armed to teeth IRGC units.
7) Armed to teeth Dozen of Iraqi Shia militias.
8) Armed to teeth Afghan Fatemiyun Shia militia.
9) Armed to teeth Pakistani Zenyabiyun Shia militia.

===============

On another hand:

1) Syrian peasants with rusty AK and few TOWs.
2) Several thousand foreign volunteers.

Assad thugs use all possible sadistic crimes: indiscriminate bombing of civilian areas, ethnic cleansing, incendiary attack of populated areas, starvation, chemical attacks, industrial scale torture, scorched earth.... They murdered 400 thousands directly and over 1 million indirectly. They displaced 12 million people. And despite all this they cant win. They barely control third of Syria. No wonder they are frustrated.
 
Currently we have in Syria:

S-400 Russian battery.
S-300V Russian battery.
Number of Russian Pantsyrs.
36 Assad Pantsyrs.
18 Assad Buk M2.
Number of newly modernized Pechoras.
And swarms of older systems SA-6, SA-3, S-200, Shilka, Osa...

And all that miserably failed vs. subsonic unstealthy Tomahawks.
1) There was prior warning of several hours.
2) There was no jamming.
3) There were no decoys.
4) There were no anti radiation missiles.

And still they miserably failed.


Here what we have in Syria:

On one hand:

1) Assad army with 5000 tanks, hundreds jets, hundreds helicopters, thousands pieces of artillery, BMP, BTR,.
2) Armed to teeth Hezbollah terrorists.
3) Armed to teeth Russian air force units.
4) Armed to teeth Russian army and SF units.
5) Armed to teeth Russian mercenary units.
6) Armed to teeth IRGC units.
7) Armed to teeth Dozen of Iraqi Shia militias.
8) Armed to teeth Afghan Fatemiyun Shia militia.
9) Armed to teeth Pakistani Zenyabiyun Shia militia.

===============

On another hand:

1) Syrian peasants with rusty AK and few TOWs.
2) Several thousand foreign volunteers.

Assad thugs use all possible sadistic crimes: indiscriminate bombing of civilian areas, ethnic cleansing, incendiary attack of populated areas, starvation, chemical attacks, industrial scale torture, scorched earth.... They murdered 400 thousands directly and over 1 million indirectly. They displaced 12 million people. And despite all this they cant win. They barely control third of Syria. No wonder they are frustrated.



Are you high? Drunk? Or just a blatant troll? It does not matter how many air defenses Russia had in Syria, they did not shoot or even attempt to shoot any of those Tomahawks.

But please if you have evidence they did, post it otherwise shut up with your conspiracies. Everyone is tired of your BS, im waiting for you to post hard facts and sources.


Amazing how even a Pantsir can shoot down cruise missiles yet Israeli boy here claim otherwise. :lol:

IMG_3161.JPG
IMG_3162.JPG
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom